Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh golly, what a bun fight.........

My take on it is this. Multi throttle bodies will give you two things, better transient throttle response, and better cleaner idle with large overlap cams. None of this is going to show up on a dyno at wide open throttle(s). On the road it might feel quite different, and that is where the advantage lies, not on the dyno, or quarter mile times.

For sheer balls to the wall top end horsepower, a single throttle body can be made as large as you want to make it. Throttle response and drivability will not improve. Drag cars have single throttle bodies, and the road racers keep the individual throttle bodies. What do YOU want to use YOUR car for ?

As far as inlet manifolds go, what else are you going to do to the engine, and what is most important to you ?

Long intake runners are a definite advantage for low end and mid range torque. At stock and moderate boost levels they are NOT restrictive as Sydneykid keeps on telling everyone. Air distribution is excellent. If you are planning absolutely massive boost and radical high Rpm power, something else might work better.

The GTR manifold was designed for less restriction, but it also is going to have less low and mid range torque because of much poorer cylinder filling off boost. That DETT engine relies totally on boost pressure to make it go.

I would bet that with stock boost and stock single turbo, an RB25DET will have reduced low and mid range torque, and it will not have the same top end power as the GTR simply because the stock turbo will run out of flow. Although I have not actually tried this myself.

It probably will work better if you are planning to upgrade everything else along with the intake manifold, the engine will then take on a completely different character.

At stock GTR power levels the factory GTR manifold will have near perfect air distribution. The Nissan engineers made it that way by putting in all those ridges, steps, and curves. But if you start increasing the air velocities greatly above what it was designed for, it will all start to go wrong, and the rear cylinder runs lean.

That is where all this nonsense started, guys start running 20+ psi and complain the stock manifold is rubbish. Well, maybe, but it was never designed for that.

Decide what you want it to do, and design it to do that job.

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That is where all this nonsense started, guys start running 20+ psi and complain the stock manifold is rubbish. Well, maybe, but it was never designed for that.

Excellent post Warpspeed, I would only like to add one little bit to the above para....

The Gibson GTR's ran the standard plenum and throttle bodies and the only engine dyno sheet I have seen showed 640 bhp at 1.9 bar (28 psi). So if 13 years ago they could get it to work perfectly, run 1,000 kms at race pace, up and down MtPanorama, surely it is not stretching the imagination for us to do the same now. Just the ECU improvement alone is light years ahead. :burnout:

WARPSPEED- Good explanation mate, The reason i have got the GTR plenum sitting in my shed over the Greddy on or custon one of stock runners is because i bought a big package when my engine blew, consisted of afew gtr parts including crank, rods, plenum, injectors and fuel pump n rail, also came with lots of other goodies, for me to get all these goodies at a good price i had to buy the lot. Everything is usable on my rb25 and therefor i have a gtr plenum that i am going to adapt to my head and see how she goes, thats why this thread was started. I understand that for the low-mid range torque its not going to be benificial and maybe not significant gains in top end power i havent a clue but since i got it i am going to use it seem logical? I got head port work, 256 cams therefor retaining vvt, to try n help with the breathing alittle. I think its better to put it on now whilst i have the engine out and in pieces rather than trying to swap manifolds over months down the track when the engine is in the car and driving.

Sweetr33, sounds like you have a plan.

Fitting the GTR plenum just by itself will probably make the engine feel a bit soft down low, and might be a disappointment. But if it is just the very first step in a long range plan that you have worked out, it is probably a pretty smart move.

WARPSPEED- Good explanation mate, The reason i have got the GTR plenum sitting in my shed over the Greddy on or custon one of stock runners is because i bought a big package when my engine blew, consisted of afew gtr parts including crank, rods, plenum, injectors and fuel pump n rail, also came with lots of other goodies, for me to get all these goodies at a good price i had to buy the lot. Everything is usable on my rb25 and therefor i have a gtr plenum that i am going to adapt to my head and see how she goes, thats why this thread was started. I understand that for the low-mid range torque its not going to be benificial and maybe not significant gains in top end power i havent a clue but since i got it i am going to use it seem logical? I got head port work, 256 cams therefor retaining vvt, to try n help with the breathing alittle. I think its better to put it on now whilst i have the engine out and in pieces rather than trying to swap manifolds over months down the track when the engine is in the car and driving.

Are you still running the stock ECU ?

Seen how many Jap circuit race cars have single throttle bodys now.

AS for the oz race cars that was a very long time ago and to group A rules so even if they wanted to change them they can't under group A.

Ask John munro about ND4SPD and you will see its a genuine streeter but we are going to change the car around for a few months to show its tru performance as it has run 142mph down the 1/4 on basic dunlop road tyres wait till we set up the chassis and run semi drag rubber + good fuel and race tune.

Ok Updating, Me and dad went and had a closer look at the gtr manifold. Seems the gtr runners where they meet the head are round where the gtst inlet port shape is sort of like a butterfly shape, Our theory is to chop the standard gtst inlet manifold about 2 inches from the flange to the head, retaining the water cooler feature, which would also make the part where wer need to adapt the gtr plenum also round following so far?

There was going to be a drama fitting the injectors into the gtr plenum, meaning we had to drill holes into the runners and make alloy sleeves to fit the injectors and get the right angle of fire etc, but now with retaining the standard inlet flange we already have hoels for injectors and also a good spray angle with the aid of the inlet water cooling.

Another drama we came across with the initial thought of just making an adapter plate was that the gtst inlet ports are wider than the gtr plenum holes so we would have to somehow taper down the the correct size. Was going to be a hassle so we have decided this is the best way. Let me know what u guys think and know about our idea

This has been done before by many people. The way they do it is as you suggest. Cut all the GTST runners off straight, just before the injectors, and either weld on the GTR plenum direct, or better still, weld on a flat flange plate, and then bolt on the GTR plenum.

There will be quite a bit of grinding and matching because the runners DO NOT LINE UP perfectly. GTST runners are almost evenly spaced, the GTR plenum has the runners spaced in three pairs to suit the three twin throttle bodies. Every runner needs to be moved sideways a small amount. This is not obvious just by quickly looking, but if you look very carefully you will see what I mean.

You will come across the problem that cylinders 3&4 dip down on the RB25 lower runners to make them equal length. This to me seems like the biggest problem.

***Does anyone have an RB20 lower runner section that they can look at for me!!!****

I'm going to have a red face I can tell but... what is that? Some sort of wild mods to the 5th and 6th cylinder?

Nah, #5 and #6 are different to clear the master cylinders, brake and clutch. As you can see they are the same close to the cylinder head, so you can cut and weld on a flange. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...