Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think that looks nice now, and i think would be a perfect height for a nice kit, skirts, front/rear bar. If you go too low now, you'll be stuck with body kits if you wanna go down that path.

I think it's a good height now, and a good height for a kit if you want. Maybe focus on peformance aspects of your suspension? real low doesn't mean good handling, sway bars, stiffer shocks, etc.

cheers.

Whiteline specify 34cm from centre of wheel to wheelarch for optimal height with their kits. I'm not using their kits but I'm running same height and it feels a LOT better than what I was running previously (31F 32R). Plus I'm not afraid of my driveway no more! :)

There is a certain height that no matter what angle you take the car it will scrape...also It doesn't handle very well. My car came from Japan with about 5mm between the guard and tyre. The result: I couldn't corner fast because it would scrape with the bodyroll.

Why buy a fast car to drive slow? So I raised it to more acceptable levels. Still low but not a lo-rider now.

As I said, on an R32 33-35cm from centre of wheel to arch is good(leaves about 1cm-1.5cm between wheel and guard).

It also depends on what suspension it is ecenshu (coilovers vs standard struts) and if the guards have been rolled. Amoore hasn't told us if he wants his car for show or go, and his car could be lowered more because there is no bodykit. From the pictures, there looks to be still a 35-45mm gap between guard + tyre.

There is nothing better than a car with big mags, no kit and lowered to an acceptable height.

if u go lower i reckon another inch will do the trick, having it sitting just above the top of the tyres will look good. go any lower and run the risk of struggling to get up driveways if u end up gettin a front bar.

and like others have said the condition of many of our roads are poor so u will be feeling the bumps A LOT more if u go too low

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...