Jump to content
SAU Community

GTR front K Frame differences


Recommended Posts

To be more specific , is there any difference in the front engine subframe ( K Frame /Cradle) used on the AWD Nissan Skyline GTR 32 , 33 or 34 and the AWD Stagea and AWD  GTS4  vehicles.

Are they all the same or are some the same or all different to each other. Can the be interchanged.

Thank you.

Ashley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK here you go, Nissan part numbers, weights from amayama.com :

54401-86L00 - R32 GTR, R32 GT4, A31, early C34 and R33 GT4. 16.1kg.

54401-85T00 - later R33 GT4 and C34, WC34 Stagea and R34 GT4. 18.7kg.

54401-24U00 - R33 GTR, some R33 GT4, 260RS Stagea, and some WC34 Stagea. 16kg.

54401-AA300 - R34 GTR. Not interchangeable with others at least because of significant steering rack mounting differences. 16.62kg.

 

Nissan mark NONE of them as interchangeable, but I'd guess that the 24U00 and 85T00 are probably pretty similar, and even the 86L00 considering a particular year model R33 did use this one too. Differences could be mounting points for heat shields, undertrays etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dr Phil , thank you for the information , this is what I suspected.

I am looking for a complete Sub frame AWD for a conversion.

Do you know of anything available.

Thank you.

Ashley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, so I think that is the point. If you presume a 25% lower reading on a chassis dyno than what the engine is making, then the most you would see from a 720HP engine is ~550wHP. "Lose" a little more because AWD dyno and the number will be lower. Call a hub dyno "wheel HP" and you should see higher numbers. But the horses would be a different size. And as Murray says above - an imposed 90% DC limit drops 550 down to 500 straight away. 80% takes you down to ~450.
    • Sounds reasonable to me.  Do you know what your injector duty cycle is? I guess everyone has their own personal limit as to how high they want to flirt with 100% duty cycle, but who knows what your tuners limit is. Maybe they like to cap it at 80%? Now your injector CC to HP conversion has a 20% hair cut on it, then through drivetrain losses, yeah 500rwhp seems ok to me.  If you plan to spend on your GTR, modern injectors and a modern ECU will go a long way! 
    • @GTSBoythanks for replying. That's realistic and I always believed in the injector-hp rule of thumb. I am however making way less than that 😕 My guestimate/goal for the setup is a reliable 500rwhp, R33 gtr, seems realistic enough doesn't it?
    • 720cc injectors can only support about 720 engine HP. Maybe a little bit more. 600rwHP is, um, a plenty big chunk of that number. Probably running to the top of your fuel supply.
    • Hi gents, sincerely asking you guys the theoretical or actual power figures expected from the setup below: HKS Y pipes & 80mm cat back, Sard (denso) 720cc injectors, DW300 pump, R35 MAFs, Twin HKS 2530's (stock headers), Trust intercooler, stock BOV, stock intake plenum & TB's, N1 oil pump, MLS head gasket, forged pistons, poncam B's, Power FC, pump RON97, nismo coppermix twin plate, 18's on 265 rubber. So I've pretty much listed all that matters with regards to making and putting the power down. Asking as I may or may not be getting the full potential of my setup (bottom end was running 600rwhp on a different car). I have done numerous Dyno sessions with slightly different setups but more or less the same outcome which leads me to conclude (reluctantly) the setup is maxed out. Will share graphs but would like you to share your input first for better effect. Thanks in advance, guys!
×
×
  • Create New...