Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have experience with the 62mm version fitted into a crappy ill-machined chinese .63 undivided housing.

RB25DET neo stock engine was approx 400kww on 98 around 27psi.

Forged bottom end and light porting became more det limited as comp crept up a tad and was approx 380kww on 98 then 470kww

on E78 approx 32 psi. Awesome turbo. With decent housing would be even better. If you want more chuck the KTS upgrad wheel on.

Have dyno sheets if wanted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475559-garrett-gtw/#findComment-7893214
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, infomotive said:

Have experience with the 62mm version fitted into a crappy ill-machined chinese .63 undivided housing.

RB25DET neo stock engine was approx 400kww on 98 around 27psi.

Forged bottom end and light porting became more det limited as comp crept up a tad and was approx 380kww on 98 then 470kww

on E78 approx 32 psi. Awesome turbo. With decent housing would be even better. If you want more chuck the KTS upgrad wheel on.

Have dyno sheets if wanted.

Great information, what about spool ?

U can post some dyno's :) 

Edited by joe89
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475559-garrett-gtw/#findComment-7893216
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2018 at 11:08 PM, joe89 said:

Hi there ?

Anyone have experience with Garrett GTW turbo's? I'm going to buy GTW3684R with 0.70 T4 divided exhaust side. Hope it will spool like GT3582R with 0.84 T4 divided and make at least 50 horsepower more?

Will be interesting to see how that goes, it's a bigger turbo than a GT3582R running a T-series turbine so I'd not necessarily count on better response but post results when you get it going.  

On 12/7/2018 at 11:57 AM, infomotive said:

Here is 25 neo GTW (Red) vs 3 Litre GTR head w cams etc Holset HCR40rs (Blue ) (supposed 650 kw hub)

 

HRC40RS making 650kw @ hubs?  Crikey, I use hub dynos and that sounds ambitious to me - though I'd hope that the claim there was at least on higher boost than the 18psi in this comparsion?

The GTW3684R is a 62mm, but the GTW3884R has a 62mm option as well - do you know which was used in this comparison?  

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475559-garrett-gtw/#findComment-7893746
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2018 at 10:20 AM, Lithium said:

Will be interesting to see how that goes, it's a bigger turbo than a GT3582R running a T-series turbine so I'd not necessarily count on better response but post results when you get it going.  

HRC40RS making 650kw @ hubs?  Crikey, I use hub dynos and that sounds ambitious to me - though I'd hope that the claim there was at least on higher boost than the 18psi in this comparsion?

The GTW3684R is a 62mm, but the GTW3884R has a 62mm option as well - do you know which was used in this comparison?  

Don't think response will be far off in the proposed turbine housing. Will certainly make more power.

 

Just what the customer was told and told me.

 

Was a 3684R 62mm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475559-garrett-gtw/#findComment-7893882
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
×
×
  • Create New...