Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a c35 S1 rb25det manaul laurel, running an apexi fc and few small mods boost controller, fmic, cat back and air filter.

During the map time on the dyno, results where very low.  The tuner was expecting figures closer to the 290 range and instead it came around 236.  Since then compression, engine timing and many many other things have been checked and all came out correct. 

The only thing that is puzzling me is that the base timing is set to be 15 degrees.   This was done from the loop wire at the back of the car.  This shows at 15.  Then checking the white centre wire into the coil on no.1 still shows 15.  But through reading where many people have suggested the ht lead directly onto the sparkplug tactic for accuracy, there is then about a 5-7 degree difference in ignition timing???

It seems as though a lot of people get the same result either way, so people swear by each method.  but with this amount of deviation between the 2 it could be a cause of low power.  Compression is fine, standard AFM is almost maxed out, it does not lean out so fuel is there, compression is correct, 7 heat range iridium plugs, they are aftermarket coil packs from in japan...

 

Any help or information about why this occurs, or any other ideas would be brilliant as i've got a long way to go with this car but i need the base to be correct.

 

Thankyou 

If the car isn't taking timing and the base timing is correct try dropping your cat completely and running it on the dyno without it, ie dump pump to down pipe to atmosphere 

Could be a restrictive cat or cat back exhaust or both. 

Also just re reading are you running the stock dump and down pipe? 

(I'm assuming you're referring to wheel HP not kW) 

Yeah exhaust is standard except for back basically...was wondering about exhaust being an issue. 

Just unsure as to why there is such a difference between the two ignition timing readings. And if people are tuning from the direct to spark plug method then they could well be putting +5 advance on from the 'nissan approved' loop wire?. As the delay in the coil charge time must be in there calculations for ignition timing.  Has anyone else taken readings from the both methods? 

Car sounds and runs healthy with a decent amount of pull in the torque band But just missing the expected power

Yeah but why is there such a difference between the two? Though the loop wire gives a constant reading. Hear some people the loop jusr flashes all over the place or something. I'm just getting 5 degree difference after the coilpack? 

6 hours ago, Andy-p said:

Or has anyone got a picture of a spec 1 loop wire/colours or wiring diagram? Because one wire in a loop at the back of the engine is pink with a black stripe? Chrz 

Don't worry about that measure between coil and plug.

But why? I can understand if they give the same values, but if they are different then surely it needs to the correct nissan way otherwise it will be incorrectly set by a few degrees? I get that people get all sorts of pulses though the loop wire, but mine reads accurately?. The extended loop wire I'm using my even be the wrong wire which is why I'm getting very different readings. Even if someone knows ecu pin numbers or something for that loop wire so I can confirm/find it? Chrz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So yes. All of them. Something like 98% of all fuel in the USA has 10% ethanol: https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/ethanol-fuel-basics It's labelled as like, AKI, 87, 91, 93 with an E10 or E5 or E15 label on the pump. At a certain point, it's not just "E10" instead of 91. It is 91, 95, 98, and all of them have 10% Ethanol in them. You can also get E85 and E30 which is why you do see some people rolling around with E30 tunes in them.
    • Thanks for the response. This is an 04 EP3 Type R. JDM spec. Fairly certain they're just basic BC racing coils. I do plan to keep as the ride quality on stock I've been told is pretty meh given Sydney roads. If I were to go down that avenue, does NSW require them to be a certain spec (close to original) etc?
    • Should have asked what is the car?
    • I've had two super conflicting experiences with blue slips. My 30 year old E39 waltzed through with no issues but my brother in law was knocked back on 12 y/o 3 series due to wiper blades and some cracking in a control arm bush.  What kind of coil overs? Do you want to keep them after?  If it was me I'd get some dirt cheap shocks and springs from eBay or scumtree. Not ideal but will get you over the line and might even be less than $1k.
    • Hey guys,  Way back when (about 15yrs plus), I picked up a beautiful set of Tein 'Super Racing Spec Circuit Master RE' coilovers from Russman. I have legit never fitted them to my car, as it was garaged indefinitely while i bought a house Yada Yada. They look brand new! Anyway its time to pick up where I left off, and have started doing some khanacross and am booked in for a hill climb next month. The car has some hard af Nismo shocks in ATM, which has me wanting to upgrade again, and now I am left wondering if it's worth having these teins rebuilt? I think they where an ok shock back then, but how do they compare to what's on the market now?  Shockworks/mca are 2800+, and I am sure they are great. But if I can have these rebuilt and be better than, say, a set of bc's for around the cost of bc's, I would be happy with the performance v cost trade off.  If they are considered outdated and rubbish these days, so be it, I'll put them on the shelf and be happy to look at the pretty green colour while I save for the SW/MCA option. Grateful for your thoughts on the matter, and suggestions on who could do the rebuild if it's a worthwhile pursuit.  cheers, Rowdy. 
×
×
  • Create New...