Jump to content
SAU Community

Something bad happened.. stalled engine.. won't even turn over.. full charged.. bang noise try start


Recommended Posts

Hey all

R34 GTT...

Drove to Vic market this morning..

Driving home.. on deceleration toward traffic lights.. going neutral and engine stalls..

Try turn over click click.. click click..

Interesting..

 I have seen very flat battery and bad alternators stall cars...

Anyways brother comes to try and charge me.. try turn over.. still click click..

Smack starter a little and get it to turn over..

Serious metal on metal... Noise.. 

No oil loss, checked for wet oil in top end by fingering my engine... It has lube for sure..

I dunno.. maybe a rod and snapped or the timing belt...

 

Can anyone try help me to diagnose the noise? I cannot tell yet without opening anything

My car also died in the city today, Flinders st. Tried to jump it, nothing. Fuel pump was priming, so I thought may be the AFM, unplugged it and it started. Limped it home and starting tearing it apart, tried a working AFM - nothing, front bumper off and checked all intercooler pipes - nothing, fuel rail hose off and turned car into on position - plenty of fuel comes out, pulled plugs - fouled and wet.

Not sure what else, will change plugs tomorrow and hope for the best. Will also check all grounding points.

Can I assume that it’s getting fuel since plugs were wet to rule out injectors and pump? 

Anything else I should try? 

1 minute ago, ifixedit said:

CAS drive

 

Curious what ya mean

CAS is driven off the front end of the exhaust camshaft.  Can break.  When it does break, shit stops happening.  Or shit starts happening, depending on your point of view.  Bad noises, for example.

Nice.. gonna borrow friends engine hoist and stand and take a good look..

 

Might take off front cover first.. look at the timing belt..

 

 

Question... Is it possible to remove engine from engine bay without the a.c. compressor??

 

Don't wanna f**k with the AC.. it works so well

40 minutes ago, ifixedit said:

Nice.. gonna borrow friends engine hoist and stand and take a good look..

 

Might take off front cover first.. look at the timing belt..

 

 

Question... Is it possible to remove engine from engine bay without the a.c. compressor??

 

Don't wanna f**k with the AC.. it works so well

Want to give me a hand as well Hahahaha 

Hope you find out the problem.

1 hour ago, ifixedit said:

 

 

 

Question... Is it possible to remove engine from engine bay without the a.c. compressor??

 

Don't wanna f**k with the AC.. it works so well

Yep just unbolt it as well as the power steer pump and put a strap around them to hold to the side out of the way

Edited by NEO25T
Spelling

Thanks NEO

 

Sadly I actually partially owned a garage in Thailand modding RBs and actually watch a fair bit.. never did a rebuild but will just have a play.. cannot make it worse than it is haha

 

Maybe I can haha..

I might get the complex stuff like headwork if needed to someone

 

So anyone is West Melbourne good at working heads

And if need honing done any good places reasonable price?

13 hours ago, ifixedit said:

Thanks NEO

 

Sadly I actually partially owned a garage in Thailand modding RBs and actually watch a fair bit.. never did a rebuild but will just have a play.. cannot make it worse than it is haha

 

Maybe I can haha..

I might get the complex stuff like headwork if needed to someone

 

So anyone is West Melbourne good at working heads

And if need honing done any good places reasonable price?

Any luck today man? 

Okay things don't look so sweet.. on first impressions..

Looks like the stalled engine on approach to traffic lights was basically the CAS saying wooooooo something's up!

Looks like the idler pulley for cambelt loose and the bad noise might have been that moving around inside..

Bad bad bad the fact camshafts are not in sync..

Bad bad bad that I tried to keep turning the engine over via starter..

Can anyone weigh in with respect to a starter motor having enough power to bend valves?

I remember even on the half turn the engine was not firing to have a combustion cycle.. so interesting to see if the starter motor would just slightly gouge the pistons..

Time will tell when I go deeper..

Images here in Imgur gallery

https://imgur.com/a/yNRWr3V

 

Last thing..... Question...

Photo where the balancer pulley is.. since the engine is freely rotating half  to 3 quarters of a cycle... Is the 10mm screw being held by a ratchet bar a typical way to keep the engine crank still while ratcheting off the bolt?

I have ensured there is at least another 30-45 degrees of rotation left from where it's being held..

Or am I suppose to use a longer 10mm bolt and screw it in all the way and let it catch on the engine??

I forgot how the boys use to do this..

I kind of remember using my method haha

Unfortunately that engine is toast by the pics provided. yes the starter is geared low enough to be able to bend valves pretty easily.

How far out of phase are the cams? Can you post a front on picture please.

Continuing to try and start it has definitely done more harm than good.

5 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Unfortunately that engine is toast by the pics provided. yes the starter is geared low enough to be able to bend valves pretty easily.

How far out of phase are the cams? Can you post a front on picture please.

Continuing to try and start it has definitely done more harm than good.

  based on the little dot on cam gear and marker.. 

The intake and exhaust would be no more then few teeth out of allignment.. 3-5 teeth out maybe.. and that might be since I released the belt.. and seen it slip. 

The main concern in the crank position in relation to the cams.. considering the idler pulley that's no longer mounted would have allowed the crank and cams to misalignment..

 

I'm going to hazard a guess best chances are... The loose timing belt pulley was jamming the whole thing from turning.. I forced it by forcing the starter motor and heard a terrible grind and stopped instantly.

The grind might have been the pulley.

I'll slowly take her apart..

 

IMG_20190225_193228.jpg

IMG_20190225_193214.jpg

As far as im able to tell.....Those timing cam gears are completely misaligned if you have that at tdc cyl. The dots on the teeth of the gears should align to the whitelines on the back cover as they indicate where the markers are approximately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...