Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, tridentt150v said:

Would twin cam work better?  ie anRB25de head?  It has to breathe better surely?

 

That's a seriously more sensible option than spending any money on the 30 head. I guarantee people who want to be different are deluding themselves. There's a reason basically no one bothers with an na rb30, especially spending money on it

  • Like 1

Undoubtedly twin cam would be better, id go with a 26 head, ive found a thread on building a rb30 with a 26 head, but i havent read it. Its what i do want to do down the track but if a rebuilt 30 head is gonna cost as much as a 26 head conversion then yeah, im gonna go with the conversion. You both clearly know more than me so if you think its more sensible to go with a 25 head rather than a 26 head then obviously im gonna take your advice and go with a 25 head. not sure if they made NEO 26 heads but a NEO head would be the way to go regardless, yeah? 

I also do plan on converting both my wagons to twin cam so yeah, illogical to work towards anything but that. 

 

And again, i appreciate your help and any help that is given in the future! Thank you

  • Like 1

And if you think its more sensible to work towards the head conversion rather than working the standard head, then advice is taken! As i said, twin cam conversion is what i want to do with both my wagons down the line so maybe its best to just start there 

Seriously, unless it has to stay NA, DO NOT DO ANY WORK ON THE ENGINE. . . . NOTHING.

If you want it to be fast, put a turbo on it. Case closed. If you want to be different and fast, put a supercharger on it.

An engine conversion to a LS1 would make more sense than doing anything at all to an NA RB30.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

You made me laugh with that last comment hahahaha ?

Well to be honest, i havent got a budget in mind because everything's gonna be happening over time. And im not saying within a 6 - 12 month period. I dont value money like most people, so i dont feel as bad when im "wasting" it...plus cars cost alot when modding and upgrading "properly", so theres that

I have a feeling top end is gonna need new standard gear soon, i can here a tick coming from the rocker cover and i know its not the usual tick that rb30s are prone to...so i might just ditch the NA aspect. Im feeling a supercharger in my daily. Not sure how much the stock internals of a rb30 can withstand but i hope its a decent amount. 

9 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

I dont value money like most people, so i dont feel as bad when im "wasting" it...plus cars cost alot when modding and upgrading "properly", so theres that

In that case, either piss or get off the pot. Don't stuff around. Build a 10000rpm screamer. Full house OTT polish and balance everything to the nth degree. 6 throttles with open ram tubes, handbuilt extractors. 300° cam, 13mm valve lift, 11:1 compression and E85.

12 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

I have a feeling top end is gonna need new standard gear soon, i can here a tick coming from the rocker cover and i know its not the usual tick that rb30s are prone to

These things have hydraulic lifters. Just sayin'.

13 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

Im feeling a supercharger in my daily. Not sure how much the stock internals of a rb30 can withstand but i hope its a decent amount.

This would be a fine way to waste money. No supercharged engine is ever as good as an equivalently turbo'd engine, but it is a different sort of fun. Noise + insta-boost is always fun.

10 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

If it dont cost too much, ill see how much it is to shave a mil or 2 off the head to increase compression but im pretty sure that would involve shorter valve stems 

Not sure how shaving the head means that you need shorter valve stems. Are you thinking about the right things? It's not like it's got pushrods. The cam moves up and down with the head, and everything in it, no matter how much you chop off the bottom.

10 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

Higher compression means the engine will need more air flowing through into the chamber, yeah?

No, higher comp means it will make more power. The swept displacement remains the same (unless you bore &/ore stroke it). The head flow remains the same (unless you do something to the head &/or cam). So, the air flow will remain essentially the same. It's just the extra compression drags more power out of the same amount of fuel and air.

9 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

Ive got a spare rb30 just laying around to so ill just build that into a rb26/30 

An NA 26/30 sounds like a good idea. But a 2JZ swap is probably more interesting.

7 minutes ago, Diko31 said:

Also, thank you for havin a good yarn to us about it

No problem. I'm not actually out to stop people from having fun modifying stuff - but it is sometimes necessary to mention where efforts are wasted vs. where efforts will return benefit.

  • Thanks 1

Yeah nah, i wont be doing work like that at this stage. Maybe in the far future when ive got drift skillz

Okay so hydraulic lifters dont wear out then im guessing

Thats why i said id supercharge my daily. Cause i love the sound and the concept over a turbo. My driftpig will be turboed because well, they provide alot more power than a supercharger

Wait yeah, i thought that through wrong, valves arent at max lift when pistons are at tdc ?‍♂️

Okay so ill definitely be shaving the head. Do you reckon advancing the timing a couple degrees would be worth while, or just leave as is?

I want to build an NA engine because i want to see how much power i can get out of an NA rb. Not many people do it, and i completely understand why, but boy do i love my rb's

I know youre not man, hence why im acknowledging what youre saying and taking your advice with most of what youre saying. But when it comes to how i want to boost my daily, whether super or turbocharged, its pure personal preference. i now realise though, after listening to what youre saying, boosting is the smarter thing to do.

Im not sure about you either, but the sound a worked NA rb30 makes, when its screaming off its dick, sends shivers down my spine 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...