Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I recently bought a completely "stock" gtr R32 and the guy I bought it from said it had $25k put into it but has supposedly has over 500hp with stock m24 turbos so I was wondering what internally would $15k get you to be at the point in hp? If anyone knows I would be grateful to know because crankshaft and pistons along with turbos are all stock

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/
Share on other sites

500HP sounds unreasonable. Dyno it and find out what the truth is. Then start thinking. We could tell you all sorts of fairy stories about how much power it could can and can't have on stock turbos. The M24 doesn't mean a lot - it's just the compressor cover casting number. The internals could be different to stock.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909974
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

500HP sounds unreasonable. Dyno it and find out what the truth is. Then start thinking. We could tell you all sorts of fairy stories about how much power it could can and can't have on stock turbos. The M24 doesn't mean a lot - it's just the compressor cover casting number. The internals could be different to stock

The guy told me when money was put into it the motor was rebuilt along with the turbos he said the turbos are off rn and once the engine gets to 500 miles in the motor which is at 153 miles right now so if I dynod it I don't think it would make 500 n/a but he also said when motor is at 500 miles the turbos get tuned to be turned on I guess and it'll push somewhere from 500-700 hp

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909980
Share on other sites

Oh Boy!

I'm starting to have a bad feeling about this. When you say "the turbos are off right now", do you mean off the engine, not installed? Because if so, there is no reason, no reason at all, to try to run the engine without the turbos. I have absolutely no idea how you would go about trying to do so. You need to somehow connect exhaust manifolds to an exhaust system that normally relies on turbos to make the connection, and you have to somehow get the induction system to connect from the front of the plenum to the air flow meters. This is all big fabrication work for a completely unnecessary and bullshit "requirement" to run the engine in without turbos. No-one else in the rest of the world would do this.

If you mean simply that they are fitted but somehow "disabled", then that's not really possible either unless the wastegates are wired open. The only logical thing is that they might be set to low boost and the boost controller could be turned up later.

Have you paid money? Can you get it back?

You will NEVER make >500HP off stock turbos, let alone 700. It's a GTR, not a Dodge Demon. They were good for ~400HP. Maybe a bit more. Have a read around the threads in the forum. Here's one. It's the second post in the conveniently named sticky thread at the top of the FI forum about Rb26 power outputs from different turbos. Stock turbos making <450HP (at the engine) in 2005. At max (sensible) boost of 14 psi. https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93880-rb26-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/?do=findComment&comment=1700397

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909982
Share on other sites

No as in what you were saying the turbos are set to 0psi(I should've specified that sorry) turbos spool but nothing greater than 0psi yes eachone after 500miles will be tuned to spool 12psi on each one but I don't think they'll push the car to 500-700 hp but my father to whom is a mechanic thinks it doesn't because he called the company that "built" the motor but me who is a jdm fanatic and worked on jz's and fa20's and Winkle rotors I know that out of the stock input/output won't create that much power but he likes to argue lmao. Just wanted to clarify it with others who know about RB's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909983
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brzerkr said:

are set to 0psi

Difficult to achieve. Also pointless and unnecessary.

Most of us just drive gently for the first few miles (AND with standard break in practice of not just pussyfutting it around but making sure to give it a widely varying range of loads and revs), then lean on it hard. Many rebuilt engines are broken in on the dyno. They bed the rings in then start tuning and by the time all the power runs are finished it's had the hardest usage before the customer even gets in it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909985
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

Oh man. So you bought a car that has had a rebuild and not proven yet?

This can end bad

It'll be fineeeee. What's the worse than can happen Ben?

Honestly OP,  the whole thing sounds suss. To answer your original question to make 500hp on a rb26 is fairly easily and you don't really need to rebuild the engine if its in good condition to start with. 

For 500hp, you would need to hi-flow the twin turbos, potentially upgrade the injectors and nistune the ecu. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7910029
Share on other sites

As a general rule cars are only sold shortly after a rebuild if it has gone wrong in some way. It's often possible the rebuild may not have been done at all, just a claimed rebuild to try and sell the car. You should be extremely suspicious if someone claims a recent rebuild and get a full PPI done, possibly even an oil analysis and cut open the oil filter.

A lot of machine shops and engine builders just don't take enough care when doing rebuilds to achieve factory quality. If they can't produce receipts or invoices proving that it was rebuilt by someone who knows what they're doing, you should walk away.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7910062
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...