Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Timing belt replacement is coming up on my 33. I can't decide if I should get the motor rebuilt or not. I'm ordering $1400 of parts to do the timing belt replacement (needs new harmonic balancer, crank belt drive, thermostat, clutch fan etc etc). The only reason I am thinking of rebuilding is because the engine has a slight oil weep between the head and block. Ideally I will replace it with an oem headgasket and reuse the arp head bolts. Car only makes 450rwhp and shouldn't need the mls one. Is it worth spending the extra and pulling the motor out now to refresh it with new rings, bearings and do a few oil control mods?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477860-rebuild-or-service/
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

How would we know? How many miles has it done at this power level? How hard has it been run? What are the compressions? etc?

I'm thinking out loud, don't have many mechanically inclined people around me to discuss with.

It has done about 20,000km @ 450rwhp on a PowerFC. Car has a total of 97,000km and has no previous history of being rebuilt. 

Compression is between 154-160 psi across all 6. Hasn't got any rod knock, or any other reason for concern just thought it would be good preventative maintenance. 

The only issue with the metal headgasket in it now is it has a slight weep from the turbo side rear. Its fairly minor. Would it be best to put a factory headgasket back in and reuse the arp headstuds? 

The old factory headgasket failed at 400rwhp, but could that be due to the factory head bolts stretching and with the arps I may not have the same issue?

You don't want to rebuild it because you are spending $1,400 on timing belt etc. Cheap and dirty will cost $5k, basic rebuild $10k and of course the sky is the limit depending on what you want to change.

Rebuild means labour for engine in and out, then disassembly, cleaning, measuring, new gaskets, head and rod bolts. Machining, Measuring, rings and bearings. Yes you can save on that, particularly if you can do most of the labour, and you can decide how much you want to reuse, but it will still be 3-10x what you are already spending.

BTW are you sure the oil leak is from the head/block and not the cam seals? It is much more common there. If you really wanted to deal with that, head off while the timing belt is off is an option, but it sounds like that may have been done before, and obviously not 100% successfully if it is leaking there (suggests head or block may not be flat...)

BTW, if you are doing timing belt, always change the idler and tensioner stud/bolt, and consider doing the water pump, cam and oil pump seals while you are there.

RBs should do 300,000 if looked after (and with a bit of luck). Get some engine cleaner and get the area of the leak completely clean and dry so that you can see where the oil is coming from. Ideally you would find out why the head gasket failed rather than hope that its fixed. Did you get the head planed and crack tested and check the block with a straight edge?

9 minutes ago, KiwiRS4T said:

RBs should do 300,000 if looked after (and with a bit of luck). Get some engine cleaner and get the area of the leak completely clean and dry so that you can see where the oil is coming from. Ideally you would find out why the head gasket failed rather than hope that its fixed. Did you get the head planed and crack tested and check the block with a straight edge?

The head was skimmed and crack tested. The block I used a knife sharpening stone to get a good surface finish, and then tested with feeler gauges and a straight edge. Couldn't get 0.02mm gauge under any point. 

Permaseal MLSR was used with Holomar, I thought the block was machined but going over receipts I can see I didn't do it 100% properly and that annoys me. To do it properly I'll have to pull the motor out and completely disassemble the block to have it decked won't I?

At that compression you would be retarded to want to rebuild that. Stock rb26 is 171psi factory which nobody ever gets from stock, 160 odd is awesome. Pull head off, keep engine in car. Sort head, gasket, timing belt, done.

Check valve clearance while your down there, be silly not to.

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Blakeo said:

The head was skimmed and crack tested. The block I used a knife sharpening stone to get a good surface finish, and then tested with feeler gauges and a straight edge. Couldn't get 0.02mm gauge under any point. 

Permaseal MLSR was used with Holomar, I thought the block was machined but going over receipts I can see I didn't do it 100% properly and that annoys me. To do it properly I'll have to pull the motor out and completely disassemble the block to have it decked won't I?

No that sounds like you did it properly. Its rare that the block needs machining and as you have checked it there should be no need. Look elsewhere for the oil leak. Check your receipts to see if the cam cover gaskets were renewed. Some people re-use the old one and don't have a problem but of course they may leak. The bits for the half moon need renewing and usually sealing with something.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...