Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On a car in queensland that comes standard with the same width wheels front and rear, for example my HCR32, is it roadworthy when upgrading wheels to have different widths front to rear.

ie. 18x7.5 F

18x8.5 R

instead of standard

16x6.5 F+R

i know that the tyres must be the same side to side. .just concerned with

1. how many inches wider than standard i can go and be roarworthy

2. if i can run wider on the rear than the front and stay roadworth

surely there are heaps of people here running non stanard rims that can shed some light. are r33's same width front and rear? what about r34's

thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47953-wheel-width-laws/
Share on other sites

Extract from Qld Transport Vehicle Modification Guide

Full version of the guide can be dowloaded here

http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/qt/driver....dex/vehiclemods

Low Profile Tyres

It is common practice for manufacturers to fit low profile tyres

to high performance motor vehicles as standard equipment.

Low profile tyres (50, 60 or 65 series), replacing standard

profile tyres (70 series or above), are normally fitted in

combination with rims of larger than standard diameter to

maintain the correct overall diameter of the wheel.

A diagram of this concept appears below.

The rim diameter may be varied from the standard size

but the overall diameter of the tyre must not vary by more

than +15 mm or -26 mm.

These limits have been set for a number of reasons. Varying

the overall diameter of tyres affects ground clearance, centre

of gravity, brake effectiveness, steering geometry,

performance and speedometer accuracy.

Generally, to meet these limits, 60 series tyres are fitted to rims

with a diameter increase of 26 mm larger than standard and

50 series tyres are fitted to rims with a diameter 50 mm

larger than standard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47953-wheel-width-laws/#findComment-966859
Share on other sites

General Conditions for Alternative Rims and Tyres

The rims and tyres must not protrude beyond the bodywork

of the vehicle, including flares, when viewed from above and

when the wheels are facing straight ahead. If the vehicle was

originally constructed with a portion of the wheel protruding,

the wheels must not protrude further than originally constructed.

The tyre to rim fitting and the tyre to rim combination must

be in accordance with the Tyre and Rim Standards Manual

published by the Tyre and Rim Association of Australia.

Reputable tyre retailers should have this information

and be able to advise on the correct combinations.

All rims fitted to an axle must be of the same diameter, width

and offset. They must not have a circumferential weld other

than that which attaches the outer rim to the centre.

All rims must have stud hole pitch circle diameters appropriate

to the hub. Wheel nut tapers must be appropriate to the wheel

and must engage the thread of the wheel studs for at least the

same length as the nuts provided by the vehicle manufacturer.

Slotted and elongated stud holes are not permitted.

The fitting of spacers between wheels and hubs, additional to

those provided by the vehicle manufacturer, is not permitted.

The tyre and rim must not foul wheel arches or suspension

components under any conditions. Steering limit stops should

not be adjusted to reduce the turning circle in order to allow

the fitting of the tyres and rims.

The tyres must have a tread depth of at least 1.5 mm on every

part of the tyre that touches the road and not have any

apparent defect that is likely to make the vehicle to which

they are fitted unsafe. It is not permitted to fit tyres that have

been treated by recutting or regrooving unless the tyre has

been marked by the original manufacturer as “suitable for

recutting or regrooving”.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47953-wheel-width-laws/#findComment-966862
Share on other sites

Tyres

The maximum tyre width must not be more than 1.3 times wider

than the vehicle manufacturer’s widest optional tyre. However, in

the case of off-road passenger vehicles fitted with front and rear

beam axles, the maximum tyre width must not be more than

1.5 times larger than the manufacturer’s widest optional tyre.

The nominal width of the narrowest tyre fitted to a vehicle must

not be less than 70 percent of the nominal width of the largest

tyre fitted and never less than the vehicle manufacturer’s

narrowest optional tyre as indicated on the manufacturer’s

tyre placard.

Hope this helps to educate all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47953-wheel-width-laws/#findComment-966868
Share on other sites

thanks gary.. i was looking on the net this morning tryin to find something like that.

by the sounds of all that i can run different widths front to rear.. but same widths per axle. i shoud be legal upgrading from

16x6.5 205 F+R

to

18x7.5 215/40/18

18x8.5 225/40/18

anyones experinces would help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47953-wheel-width-laws/#findComment-967338
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...