Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have  a rb25 turbo eng  and turbo gearbox already sitting in a R31.

got a manual r31 tailshaft and a commodore vl turbo front yoke.

after  what everyone says ,  it looks like  the  commodore vl turbo front yoke WILL NOT go onto a R31 manual tailshaft. the vl turbo uni cap is just over 25mm and the r31 uni cap is just under 25mm, theres a differance of nearly 1mm...

any way i can fix this ? to get  vl yoke on r31 manual tailshaft ?

 

IMG20200908125705.jpg

IMG20200908125820.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481098-rb25-in-r31-tailshaft-problem/
Share on other sites

The usual thing to do (RB25 box into R32, for example) is to take the front part of the tailshaft that suits the box and the front part of the tailshaft in the car to Hardy Spicer (along with a careful measurement of the required length) and get them cut and shut together.

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

The usual thing to do (RB25 box into R32, for example) is to take the front part of the tailshaft that suits the box and the front part of the tailshaft in the car to Hardy Spicer (along with a careful measurement of the required length) and get them cut and shut together.

ok,  the yoke that was supplied  to me isnt a vl turbo one , the caps are nearly the same , and also just noticed  the measurement  inside the  " U "    u part on back of the slip yoke is about 2 cm too narrow.  it slides in back of gearbox but it wont  hold a ruj2030  universal joint.

19 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

The usual thing to do (RB25 box into R32, for example) is to take the front part of the tailshaft that suits the box and the front part of the tailshaft in the car to Hardy Spicer (along with a careful measurement of the required length) and get them cut and shut together.

If you are in Brisbane, the nice man from Hardy Spicer will come out and measure the car to ensure its the correct measurement. Although I suspect this service is to counteract ,a previous number of arguments, with retards(customers) who can't use a tape measure. The advantage with Hardy Spicer is the new joints are replaceable and larger.

Edited by Rusty Nuts
spelling
3 minutes ago, Rusty Nuts said:

If you are in Brisbane, the nice man from Hardy Spicer will come out and measure the car to ensure its the correct measurement. Although I suspect this service is to counteract ,a previous number of arguments, with retards(customers) who can't use a tape measure. The advantage with Hardy Spicer is the new joints are replaceable and larger.

its not to do with the length , its to do with the fitting of the  yoke,..  this has been soreted as i was supplied incorrect yoke.

 

No worries, glad its sorted, for future reference most brands of u-joints use the same centre cross in a range of cap sizes, so you can buy 2 u-joints same cross size with caps to suit the two different yoke sizes. Had too do this once with a HR holden, a Supra box and Torana tailshaft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...