Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hks wrote

Quote

we are not providing a service to identify the product based on photos.

 

my friend also has an hks crankshaft, he did not do any machining of the crankshaft and I saw the same photos on the Internet. he has a box with the date 04/05. step2 is written on it
it weighs 22kg and looks like this

z3_nFbbAMl4.jpg.78d8cb628a86ed9992dedc17116ae932.jpg

qxFdJ-A-RCI.jpg.0850b6e9d8bb3218908360f09fe928bc.jpg

I also found this message

1dLXtVP__8g.jpg.2d6698fff86df7da35579e2ca689b6f6.jpg

 

also on yahoo japan other crankshafts, more machining, think weight 20kg

Screenshot_2.jpg.00204785197c5a153852e35b61df25bc.jpgScreenshot_3.jpg.9b39b024ceb6708200664b8add15f9c3.jpg

 

can't define, it's all confusing

I think to lighten the crankshaft by 2-3 kg, but I don't know if it's worth it.

Edited by frakzz

I want to understand the HKS recommendations for power and rpm.
in addition, the crankshafts have different hardening layer thicknesses (different technology). for step1 layer 0.2-0.3mm and for step2 1mm

My understanding is (I’m sure I’ve read it online somewhere aswell maybe rhdjapan)

step 2 is a lighter crank

so if yours weighs around 24kg and the step 2 you found online is around the 20-22kg mark then I would assume urs is a step 1

 

Correct step 2 is lighter than the step 0 / 1 (same) crankshaft.

11 hours ago, frakzz said:

I want to understand the HKS recommendations for power and rpm.
in addition, the crankshafts have different hardening layer thicknesses (different technology). for step1 layer 0.2-0.3mm and for step2 1mm

Who cares really, as the HKS step 0, 1 and 2 are all forged cranks, step 3 the overpriced but best billet one is now discontinued and a Spool billet 77.7mm stroker crank is cheaper (and better) than all of them.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...