Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently added a 27mm Whiteline front sway bar which feels great and stiffened the whole front up nicely.

Problem is, I'm still using the OEM 13mm sway bar on the rear which undoes a lot of the front bar benefits.

Now its time to upgrade the rear one and I'm a little undecided about the one to get. 

Whiteline have a 16mm and a 20mm rear for my E90. They said that 16mm is probably better because the 20mm might cause unwanted oversteer on the street. 16mm seems pissy though and I'm wondering if they are protecting themselves.

SuperPro have a 20mm 2-point adjustable one which feels like the better option. 

Its irritating that there is no standardised measurement of sway bars so you can get a better idea before buying, rather than just reading reviews. It'd be nice to say "well 16mm will be x times better than 13mm".  The OEM front one was hollow FFS, it was light as a feather. 

Theres no doubt that the 16mm Whiteline one is going to be much better than the OEM 13mm one, but will there be an appreciable difference between the 16 and 20 ? And, maybe the softer Superpro setting will be like the static 16mm Whiteline one ? 

So confused. 

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481786-rear-sway-bar-considerations/
Share on other sites

There is no way that a 20mm solid bar on its "soft" setting will be anywhere near as soft as the 16mm solid bar. The change in arm length from "soft" to "hard" on a typical bar is about 20mm, on an arm length that is about 300mm, maybe a bit less. So, in the order of 10-15% change.

The stiffness of solid bars varies with the FOURTH POWER of the thickness. Thus, the 20mm bar will be 244% of the stiffness of the 16mm bar. Or, 144% additional stiffness over the 16.

A +/-10-15% change on that still leaves the 20mm bar over double the stiffness of the 16.

When I put bars on my R32 I put adjustable 24mm on front and rear. Set stiff at the front, soft at the rear. Was too stiff at the rear. Replaced 24 rear with 22. 24mm bar is 141% of 22mm bar stiffness, or the other way to look at it is 22mm bar is only ~70% of 24mm bar. Damn near perfect. Could possibly handle being a 20mm, preferably adjustable.

'Twere I you, I would go with suggestion for 16mm bar. It will be 229% of the 13mm bar's stiffness (assuming the 13 is solid, which it probably is).

  • Like 2

Well, any time an ARB is too stiff at one end it will push that end towards loss of grip, particularly when the surface is slippery. So on the rear the trend is towards oversteer. Now, if you want the back end to be completely detached and you aim to drive it everywhere using spinning rear wheels to provide direction as well as thrust, that's good. But otherwise it can make the back end overly nervous, prone to mid-corner detachment, which is not fun.

A quite stiff front bar (like you have now) will generally make the car's turn-in behaviour good. It will react to steering quickly and start turning the car, without that rolly feeling you get on soft barred setups. But if it is too stiff that can quickly turn into mid corner understeer immediately afterwards.

When you put on a stiff front bar, you will generally need to beef up the rear bar too, otherwise the balance will very likely be shifted towards understeer. But going overboard generally leads to the situation in the 1st paragraph.

Big bars also reduce the independence of the suspension across the car. So a big rear bar means bumps on the inside wheel get transferred to the outside wheel, which also contributes to the problem of sudden slip.

The two philosophies of suspension are;

  1. Light springs, stiff bars. This is intended to allow full axle bumps to be absorbed (ie both wheels going up and down together because you've hit something in the road that covers the whole width of the axle) and the bars control body roll,
  2. Stiff springs, light bars. This means that the springs are responsible for controlling body roll, with the bars really only used for tuning the balance.
  3. Or, you could go anywhere in between. It's a spectrum baby.

 

23 minutes ago, Rusty Nuts said:

 No need for stiffer rear sway bar; just apply throttle to rotate the rear. 👍

Or the brakes!

But generally yes the bars at either end affect how the pedals rotate the car 😛

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around with a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
    • It ended up being that orientation of the float hub in relation to the clutch disk, when I installed it, I heard a loud click and being stupid, I decided to not take it a part and check it. The hub didn't properly align with the clutch disk and was causing the issue. Definitely an odd one! Dahtone Racing was able to fix me right up, stand up blokes!      
    • Right, but I'm saying on the stock ECU measured airmass from the MAF is no higher than stock. So it's accounting for the higher flow rate iso-manifold pressure. You just have to keep turning down the boost until you're within the stock tune's load scale. If you run off the end there's no telling what will happen. This does mean there's zero benefit to the turbos you're running vs stock, if anything it's just a straight downgrade because the transient response is worse, you don't even get the ECU's boost solenoid helping to pull the wastegate closed during initial spool, and peak power is only whatever the factory map can give you before you hit the R&R corner. On a -9 I would bet that you would have to change out the wastegate spring once you have a real ECU and you're tuning it for real. I'm not saying this is a remotely ideal state of affairs, it's just a way to keep it driveable until you can get a proper tune done.
×
×
  • Create New...