Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

245 is a little bit too wide for 8" wide wheels. 235/45 much better. If you do go 245, then 40 profile a better idea.

Thanks @GTSBoyย 

The OE wheels currently have Mickey Thompson ET Street Series fitted, in a 255/50R16.

245/45R16 sizing was a calculated decision; (I understand this is much larger than the factory tyres), slightly smaller rolling diameter than the MT's, shaves the tyre width as fitted from the MT's @ 10.04" down to a more respectable 9.65".ย ย 

Tyre dimension chart below for reference.

As per your advice, I'll look further into it before ordering ๐Ÿ™‚ย 

Screenshot_20221108-221916_Chrome.jpg

You can run fat drag radials because they are not about turning corners. But for decent street/circuit driving, too much width leads to baggy sidewalls which is not nice for cornering performance. You have to rein in your (completely understandable) desire for more rubber on the road to avoid the compromises you have to make elsewhere.

Every time I go to buy tyres I um and ahh about putting 245s on my 8" wide wheels, and eventually punch myself in the face and stay with the 235s. As yours is a GTR, wider tyres are eminently possible - you just need 9.5 or 10" wheels.

  • Thanks 1
2 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Every time I go to buy tyres I um and ahh about putting 245s on my 8" wide wheels, and eventually punch myself in the face and stay with the 235s.

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ Loud and clear; I appreciate the proverbial punch in the face too lol.ย 

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

You can run fat drag radials because they are not about turning corners. But for decent street/circuit driving, too much width leads to baggy sidewalls which is not nice for cornering performance. You have to rein in your (completely understandable) desire for more rubber on the road to avoid the compromises you have to make elsewhere.

Every time I go to buy tyres I um and ahh about putting 245s on my 8" wide wheels, and eventually punch myself in the face and stay with the 235s. As yours is a GTR, wider tyres are eminently possible - you just need 9.5 or 10" wheels.

Even on the 9.5" and 10" wheels like I have on the 32 GTRs the above is true. 275 or 285 does not fit on car or corner as well as 255 or 265 with these widths.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 08/11/2022 at 9:31 PM, Shoota_77 said:

I had one, terrible car! ย The CVT felt like it was operated by the loosest rubber band ever madeโ€ฆ. ย 

Mine was a GT wagooon manual. Floppy shifter but otherwise ran fine. I was rather lucky as I had zero issues with it. I found it quite a luxurious ride.

As for tyres, my general rule of thumb is:
7.0" = 215
7.5" = 225
8.0" = 235
8.5" = 245
9.0" = 255
9.5" = 265
10.0" = 275

But I did put 265/35 on R34 GT-R (18x9) wheels though

  • Thanks 1
11 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

Mine was a GT wagooon manual. Floppy shifter but otherwise ran fine. I was rather lucky as I had zero issues with it. I found it quite a luxurious ride.

As for tyres, my general rule of thumb is:
7.0" = 215
7.5" = 225
8.0" = 235
8.5" = 245
9.0" = 255
9.5" = 265
10.0" = 275

But I did put 265/35 on R34 GT-R (18x9) wheels though

This assumes all tyres are measured equal, which they are definitely not. In real world an AD08R in 265 is wider than their own Advan v105 in 275 for example. RS4 265 is about the same as an AD08R 255, so this fact alone really complicates things. It'sย  taken me about 15+ years to get my head around this from trial and error,ย  which always makes me cautious on using a tyre I'd never tried before.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory. ย  The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down. ย  I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU. ย  On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable". ย  Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke ย 
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.ย  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm.ย 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanksย 
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...