Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to order the release bearing, the part number seems to be 30502-69F10 (?)

Nengun says it is no longer available.

https://www.nengun.com/oem/nissan/30502-69f10

1997 GTSTS2

Is there a replacement part # ?

Cheers

 

 

 

 

For what it's worth, Amayama lists some potential replacements:

https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/3050269f10

I don't know whether this is right for you though.

What is your situation?

I have started doing research for a clutch refresh on my car and the release bearing comes with the Nismo kit that I'm looking at.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, Torques said:

Hi,

The situation is that I need the standard OEM release bearing for the standard clutch ... :)

Even the genuine one is an NSK bearing - it's not like Nissan make their own bearings.

Hi,

Yes, thanks for the input.

I'm more than happy to buy from NSK or NTN or SKF.

 

It would help if I had the OEM dimensions but according to SKF I might have found something using

30502-69F10

https://vehicleaftermarket.skf.com/mt/en/products/VKC3737

 

 

 

 

 

On 19/11/2022 at 3:06 AM, Torques said:

Is there a replacement part #

Most people will be using the Koyo bearing RCT40SA3 from somewhere like CBC here in Australia.

There is a factory Nissan replacement of 30502-69F1A, but it's 100% a Koyo bearing anyway.

Hello,

Thanks for the input.

 

I also saw the 4075-1S listed as R33GTST  bearing

https://koyo.jtekt.co.jp/en/products/detail/?pno=RCT4075-1S

Here's the 40SA3

https://koyo.jtekt.co.jp/en/products/detail/?pno=RCT40SA3

 

Major difference seems to be 'd' which is 74.5mm vs 82.2mm

Too bad I don't have an old bearing / carrier  to check.

 

 

 

 

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...