Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey folks, 

Long story short I had an issue with brake squeal, and since fitting the oem shim kit, they're tight af on just the inner pad.

Just want to see if anyone has previously encountered this issue before I go spending more money on rotors/ machining etc

 

So full story. Since replacing front brakes I've been chasing an issue with horrible brake squeal at all temps.  I had fitted DBA T3 296mm front rotors (as car evidently has R33 gtst/32gtr calipers since 296mm were on it when i bought it), Bendix Ultimate Pads and rebuilt the front calipers using an OEM rebuild kit so pistons now move nice and free. With these pads I couldn't fit the oem anti squeal shims/plates whatever you prefer to call em (they have their own built in shim which obstructs the oem ones), so I didn't and they screamed at medium braking no matter what I did. 

So to solve the squeal I've swapped them out for a set of Project Mu pads meaning I was able to fit a full new set of oem shims. However once pads were in I noticed there was twice as much pad free play on the outer pad than the inner (inner was quite tight) and once wheel was on and tightened it couldn't turn, as it has pressed the rotor against the inner pad. 

 

So while the problem may seem silly, I'm struggling to think of reasons for this aside from rotor offset being incorrect or rotor being too thick, or caliper pistons being stuck but they move fine and all 4 pistons are sitting in the same position. Is there a difference in rotor thickness between 32 gtr and 33 gtst? Is there difference in offset/depth? Have I missed something completely stupid?

I could remove the shims but that doesn't really solve the underlying issue lol. Happens on both sides if that helps.

 

Thanks for reading this long post. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484854-r32-front-brakes-not-fitting/
Share on other sites

FWIW, I believe that while we often say r33 gtst and r32 gtr (non brembo) have the same size discs, i seem to remember R33 has a 30mm disc thickness and GTR had 32mm. How thick is the disc you have? The caliper/disc offset is the same.

This is on a r32 gtst, right? I would check there is no shim or washer of any sort between the hub and caliper mounts

 

Yup. GTR is 32mm. Plain R33 is 30mm.

Caveat being that the 324mm rotors on the Brembos go back to 30mm also. Makes it confusing and you need absolute clarity when talking about these brakes.

I don't know for sure, but I suspect that a 32mm rotor is not a good fit in the GTST caliper. I think they might actually be different (the calipers, that is).

12 hours ago, Duncan said:

FWIW, I believe that while we often say r33 gtst and r32 gtr (non brembo) have the same size discs, i seem to remember R33 has a 30mm disc thickness and GTR had 32mm. How thick is the disc you have? The caliper/disc offset is the same.

This is on a r32 gtst, right? I would check there is no shim or washer of any sort between the hub and caliper mounts

 

Yes on a R32 gtst, there's nothing between the caliper and hub though. But yes I'm fairly certain the rotors I ordered were for R32 gtr which would be 32mm. Still doesn't explain the issue unless it's a manufacturing issue with the rotors which seems unlikely given the brand. 

I really don't want to buy any more parts just to diagnose 🙈

 

Tried to reply earlier but wasn't working for some reason so I'll reply to both comments*

 

Yeah it wasn't as easy as I'd like to slide the pads over the rotor with all the hardware attached unfortunately. Thinking I may have to do the unfortunate compromise of getting rotors machined down to fit rather than buy more new ones. Perhaps chassis matters slightly ie 33 calipers + 32gtr rotors on a 32 gtst. I'm not sure, I find it unusual

1 hour ago, Chopstick Tuner said:

Perhaps chassis matters slightly ie 33 calipers + 32gtr rotors

See my suspicion above. R32 has nothing to do with it. I had R33 calipers on R33 296x30 rotors on a 32. It's fine. But if, as I suspect, the R33 calipers are not as wide in the body as the GTR calipers are.....then snap. There's your problem.

The thing is, the offset is meant to be the same so when the disc is properly centred in the caliper it should be equal spacing for both inner and outer pads, so disc thickness should not make a difference (although, it might show up a difference). New pads can also show up a difference because they can be taller than factory pads too

With the rotor bolted to the hub, what is the gap to the caliper on each side?

I'm not sure what is happening in your case, but personally I'd be happy to put a spacer of the right width to centre the caliper on the disc if it is only out by a mm or 2 (the spacer needs to be half the difference between the 2 gaps). It is possible the 33 gtst calipers had their mounting machined before they were installed, you really couldn't tell without comparing/measuring them to another set.

BTW if you go down the machining route, you also have the option of having the pads machined instead of the disc which might be a cheaper solution over time

The gap seemed pretty equal tbh, I measured quite roughly using a tape yesterday so I'm not 100% on the measurement (perhaps 19mm from caliper inside edge to rotor,  from memory) but were the same both sides of the caliper. On passenger side both inner and outer pad seemed equally jammed and same result, can't spin it. 

I've pulled them out for a look and rotors are definitely 32mm if not a hair thicker. I did consider machining rotors as I thought it would be a more permanent solution but discovered there's a marking stating minimum thickness of 30mm 😅 

 

Just to clarify, where would you consider a spacer on the caliper? As the caliper sits on the rotor side of the hub, the only way to sit it further away from rotor would be to machine a bit off the mounting point of the caliper. 20230815_132344.thumb.jpg.22d3481b861999c46cffce83413f6bc9.jpg

All good, I misunderstood, I thought the issue was the rotor was not centred in the caliper but it sounds like it is OK. Which is a good thing because it is a much easier problem to solve

So for sure, I'd be looking at reducing the pad thickness. Its 1mm per side so not a lot required to get them fitting, some aftermarket pads are just that bit higher and while it isn't surprising suppliers treat R32 GTR and R33 GTST as identical for supply it looks like the combination of both being just a bit bigger has caused a problem.

1 minute ago, Duncan said:

All good, I misunderstood, I thought the issue was the rotor was not centred in the caliper but it sounds like it is OK.

So for sure, I'd be looking at reducing the pad thickness. Its 1mm per side so not a lot required to get them fitting, some aftermarket pads are just that bit higher and while it isn't surprising suppliers treat R32 GTR and R33 GTST as identical for supply it looks like the combination of both being just a bit bigger has caused a problem.

Totally understandable, my post wasn't entirely clear because I wasn't yet sure what I was dealing with. But having fitted up the other side it seemed just too tight a squeeze to get pads past the rotor both sides. It's entirely possible it pressed slightly harder against one pad but I think the issue still stems simply from thickness unfortunately. 

I'm going to look into getting pads altered and see how that goes. It's definitely not much, as everything fits with no shims fine like I had before,  but that's obviously not ideal lol

 

Always more to learn working on these. Cheers for the insights!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just a thought, how come you didn't use a 4D table? So you essentially run 2x fuel and 2x ignition tables, and the table/map switch is handled when there's enough WMI pressure detected. This is mine, but using the flex sensor as the 4th dimension, note the slider at the bottom. Between 0 to 70%, the timing is blended/interpolated , once it goes past 70% ethanol full send
    • Hi guys, after dreaming of owning a JDM legend for 20 years, I got the chance to buy a 1995 R33 GTR.  I live in a small country called the Solomon Islands which is in the pacific. There is no performance car scene here, however 90% of vehicles here are 2nd hand Japanese imports so there is a handful of JDM sports cars here, tucked away.  3 Evo VI’s, 1 180sx turbo, 2 GTO’s, 1 R32 GTR and 2 R33 GTR’s.    Only 1 Evo and a 33 (mine) are active. I’m hoping to set up a club to get these cars back in the road.    I’d known of my GTR for 9 years and always dreamed of owning it. At the start of this year I found it sitting outside a workshop waiting for a respray. It was in pretty bad shape, although running and driving perfectly apart from a big exhaust leak and worn out bushings. My brother in law who is a huge GTR guy came over for a holiday and I took him to see it, he got into my ear and I bought the car 2 weeks later as is.   I’ve had a pretty bad problem with alcohol and weed since 2020 and I really wanted to quit. So I used this as my motivation. I quit everything cold turkey and have been investing all my spare time into restoring this car. It’s honestly been the best experience and has been such a positive impact on my life.  There is no market for these cars here, no parts and no mechanics that can work on them, so if you wanted to sell one it would be pretty impossible unless you found the right buyer. After a bit of negotiating with the previous owner (a good friend) I got the car for $15,000 AUD ($85,000 SBD) which is insane.  I’ve almost finished doing a refresh on the engine, new turbos, spark plugs and split fire coil packs. Also new gaskets and seals, This car had no leaks to begin with, but it’s due now being 30 years old. . Next I’ll be working on the suspension, all new bushings, ball joints, king pins and new coil overs.  Then it will be body work, it has really bad rust in the boot floor, I have purchased a rear beaver cut from my bro which will replace the rusted out one. The car is originally KL0, but was burnt orange when it landed here, then it was resprayed toxic green and then Bayside Blue. I’m probably going to get it redone in Bayside Blue.  I’m super grateful to be able to enjoy this car and couldn’t have done it without my bro Chris from OG-JDM. Looking forward to the future with this car and hoping to get it on the runway at the airport here 😂  cheers fellas 
    • Also, it is just about triangularity. The less angle, the easier it physically is to do. Think of the amount of slip you're getting, as how hard you need to push an object. More slip, equals pushing way harder. Then the ramp is how steep the hill is. The Accel is less slip, which means it takes less pushing (less slip) to get it to be able to push apart. However, the steeper sides on the decell means it will take a lot more pushing (slip) to get it up the ramp.
    • It's the angle of the ramp from the vertical. You're measuring from the horizontal. To convert, take 90* minus your angle reference = Nismo Angle.
    • I agree, thus 45 degree is the *max* force one could apply to it. This is similar to what I've seen in uh... simulations... which allow you to play with diff ramp angles. Anything higher (or lower) than 45 degree would produce less force as 45 is the max... triangley.  I would state the 1 way is 90 degree, at least this is how my brain and other ways of explaining it refer to it. 90 degree also effectively acted completely open. I realise Nismo refer to it not as 90 (or 89) but "1". So I'm not understanding the angle on which these angles are based.
×
×
  • Create New...