Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a built bottom end semi built head trying to decide between these two and don’t really see any info on the 20rx I’ve seen some videos on them but not really much info.  I want to be in the low 400whp range and be responsive I’ve been looking at some dyno sheets for the 25g but I do want the 8cm rear for response and I can’t find any it’s all 10cm.  I wanted to see if anyone has some info about the 20rx and could get me to my goals also if anyone has sheets or know if I could run a 25g 8cm and be in the low 400s if not how bad is the lag for 10cm.  Ik there’s better turbos for the same price but I’m in it for the sound and td06s are a classic.
 

 


hks 264 no vct (de block and head)

8.5:1

greddy mani

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/485000-rb25-td06-20rx-vs-25g/
Share on other sites

Are the Trust TD06-20RXs super super cheap?  I'm not sure why you'd go a TD06 these days unless it costs almost nothing.

From the perspective of someone who has been into RBs/turbos for over 2 decades now - I remember a time where TD06 20Gs were a wicked thing for an RB20/25.  Like they cost less, were strong, and performed admirably (for a journal bearing turbo) against Garrett/HKS turbos which cost a lot more back in the day - a 20G would be a solid alternative to something like a Garrett GT3071R or HKS 2835 for sake of argument.    That was around 20 years ago.

In that time Garrett have since released a GTX3071R, then Gen2 GTX3071R, then the G25/G30 range of turbos - and there are budget equivalents semi-loosely based off all the previous things.   This TD06 20RX from everything I can see is basically Trust finally upgrading the compressor wheel (but nothing else) to something comparable flow wise to the improvement Garrett did with the GTX3071R, a turbo that's been available for about 13 years now.    If the year was 2010 and this turbo had just came out THEN (and at a sharp price point) then I'd understand threads like this coming up... but in 2023 I just don't have a clue why they'd be a thing anyone would consider.

So yeah, short answer - it's something that will spool like a TD06 20G (a 400whp turbo from 1998) but is capable of around 10% more power.  But a Pulsar GTX3071R (or the like) will probably cost less and do everything better.  

 

24 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Are the Trust TD06-20RXs super super cheap?  I'm not sure why you'd go a TD06 these days unless it costs almost nothing.

From the perspective of someone who has been into RBs/turbos for over 2 decades now - I remember a time where TD06 20Gs were a wicked thing for an RB20/25.  Like they cost less, were strong, and performed admirably (for a journal bearing turbo) against Garrett/HKS turbos which cost a lot more back in the day - a 20G would be a solid alternative to something like a Garrett GT3071R or HKS 2835 for sake of argument.    That was around 20 years ago.

In that time Garrett have since released a GTX3071R, then Gen2 GTX3071R, then the G25/G30 range of turbos - and there are budget equivalents semi-loosely based off all the previous things.   This TD06 20RX from everything I can see is basically Trust finally upgrading the compressor wheel (but nothing else) to something comparable flow wise to the improvement Garrett did with the GTX3071R, a turbo that's been available for about 13 years now.    If the year was 2010 and this turbo had just came out THEN (and at a sharp price point) then I'd understand threads like this coming up... but in 2023 I just don't have a clue why they'd be a thing anyone would consider.

So yeah, short answer - it's something that will spool like a TD06 20G (a 400whp turbo from 1998) but is capable of around 10% more power.  But a Pulsar GTX3071R (or the like) will probably cost less and do everything better.  

 

I know there’s a so many turbos that are better but I do like how the old td06s are and how they sound mainly and I’m really going towards the 25g many ppl still use them in Japan and love them 

  • Haha 1
8 minutes ago, Prof_Finesser said:

I know there’s a so many turbos that are better but I do like how the old td06s are and how they sound mainly and I’m really going towards the 25g many ppl still use them in Japan and love them 

Ok, should have said that was your priority instead of response - a preference because you just like the idea etc is fine.

So the TD06-20RX will basically make the power of a 25G but with the spool of a 20G.  Turbine is the same so should have the same "Mitsi turbo" exhaust note you're probably looking for.  

I assume you have non vct rb25de with greddy 3 bolt turbo flange manifold, if it must be trust turbo, get trust td06sl2-20rx. As tested by trust on td06sh, 20rx spools like 20g but peak hp close to 25g, so higher average hp than 20g or 25g. By trust pictures, 20rx compressor looks like similar size as 20g compressor with smaller center hub, taller + extended tip blade, so its good as it has 20g spool but close to peak hp of much larger 25g (20g 52.6mm/68mm compressor, 25g 60.5mm/78mm compressor). What doesn't show on dyno plot is spool up/response time and lag, 25g being larger will has more inertia thus lazier than 20g and 20rx, and 20rx nearly match 25g peak hp so I see no pros of 25g vs 20rx. 

Turbine side I suggest to go with smaller td06sl2 54.1mm/61mm it should be enough to support 20rx compressor if using 10cm turbine housing (my experience with holset twin scroll 10cm spools quick and not choking on rb20, so single scroll 10 cm which flow more than twin scroll 10cm should match well with rb25, while single scroll 8cm better match rb20 but may choke on rb25). Td06sh is just regular mhi td06h turbine, its bigger at 58.8mm/67mm, also has more inertia thus lazier than td06sl2. Due to bigger wheel has more inertia thus lazier spool, for similar max flow I prefer smaller wheel + bigger housing (td06sl2 10cm) vs bigger wheel + smaller housing (td06sh 8cm).

Screenshot_20231011-093857_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231011-094500_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231011-104745_Chrome.jpg

10 hours ago, CefiroA31 said:

I assume you have non vct rb25de with greddy 3 bolt turbo flange manifold, if it must be trust turbo, get trust td06sl2-20rx. As tested by trust on td06sh, 20rx spools like 20g but peak hp close to 25g, so higher average hp than 20g or 25g. By trust pictures, 20rx compressor looks like similar size as 20g compressor with smaller center hub, taller + extended tip blade, so its good as it has 20g spool but close to peak hp of much larger 25g (20g 52.6mm/68mm compressor, 25g 60.5mm/78mm compressor). What doesn't show on dyno plot is spool up/response time and lag, 25g being larger will has more inertia thus lazier than 20g and 20rx, and 20rx nearly match 25g peak hp so I see no pros of 25g vs 20rx. 

Turbine side I suggest to go with smaller td06sl2 54.1mm/61mm it should be enough to support 20rx compressor if using 10cm turbine housing (my experience with holset twin scroll 10cm spools quick and not choking on rb20, so single scroll 10 cm which flow more than twin scroll 10cm should match well with rb25, while single scroll 8cm better match rb20 but may choke on rb25). Td06sh is just regular mhi td06h turbine, its bigger at 58.8mm/67mm, also has more inertia thus lazier than td06sl2. Due to bigger wheel has more inertia thus lazier spool, for similar max flow I prefer smaller wheel + bigger housing (td06sl2 10cm) vs bigger wheel + smaller housing (td06sh 8cm).

Screenshot_20231011-093857_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231011-094500_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231011-104745_Chrome.jpg

Thanks for that but I’ve heard that there’s not really a difference on dyno with L2 I seen one where two identical rb20s and the graphs were basically the same as they were running the same psi and same turner 

Edited by Prof_Finesser
On 10/11/2023 at 3:08 PM, Lithium said:

Ok, should have said that was your priority instead of response - a preference because you just like the idea etc is fine.

So the TD06-20RX will basically make the power of a 25G but with the spool of a 20G.  Turbine is the same so should have the same "Mitsi turbo" exhaust note you're probably looking for.  

Back in the times when they were popular it was usually td06l2/sl2 20g, td06h/sh 20g wasn't something you seemed to see around?

On 10/12/2023 at 3:02 AM, Prof_Finesser said:

Thanks for that but I’ve heard that there’s not really a difference on dyno with L2 I seen one where two identical rb20s and the graphs were basically the same as they were running the same psi and same turner 

T67 25g 10cm would usually make 20 psi before 4k on a 25 although with a bit more compression and vct than you're running, td06h/sh 25g was usually around 300rpm later, t67 with 8cm was only marginally more responsive but down around 30kw up top.

Be surprising for the l2 to not be more responsive than sh especially on a rb20, although old news I'm wondering why the sh with the 20 comp haha, maybe the sh worked better with 8cm than l2 with 10cm.

On 11/10/2023 at 4:49 PM, CefiroA31 said:

my experience with holset twin scroll 10cm spools quick and not choking on rb20

A Holset HX35 and a Mitsi TD06(/SL2) are *completely* different turbines - you absolutely cannot take what a Holset 10cm divided housing behaves like and try and use that to determine what a turbo with totally different housing and wheel geometry on both sides will do.   May as well say they're both loosely based on circles so will behave similar.

2 hours ago, WMDC35 said:

Back in the times when they were popular it was usually td06l2/sl2 20g, td06h/sh 20g wasn't something you seemed to see around?

Hmmmm.   I did write a post saying that the only ones I experienced were the bigger ones but decided to verify and there is every possibility I had actually been exposed to TD06SL2 20Gs when they had been referred to as simply "TD06 20G" so I'm actually going to have to not weigh in on that. 

The only thing I *can* add to the "maybe the SL2 doesn't add as much value as it's given credit for" is arguably the most famous TD06 aside from the TD06(something)-20G is the classic FP Green which was basically a 50-trim T4 compressor paired with a TD06H turbine, and had the reputation of outspooling and out flowing 20Gs of almost any combination... though this potentially brings the whole "compressor vs turbine matching magic" side of things into the discussion.   Sometimes the result can't exceed or fall short of the sum of the parts.

My memory also probably stretched here, but one of the best 20G setups in the entire RB kingdom was @Roy's RB20... I'm not sure that was an Sl2? 

Edited by Lithium

Short of time at the moment but .

Recently I noticed that Mitsubishi released a turbine called (from memory) TF06 - which is sort of similar dimensions to a GT30 turbine . The turbo is called TF06-18K and similar wheel wise to a GT3076R .

They have the most modern Mitsy wheel designs AFAIK .

 

2 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

Short of time at the moment but .

Recently I noticed that Mitsubishi released a turbine called (from memory) TF06 - which is sort of similar dimensions to a GT30 turbine . The turbo is called TF06-18K and similar wheel wise to a GT3076R .

They have the most modern Mitsy wheel designs AFAIK .

 

They've been out for a few years and actually a "joint" effort with (or FP say basically is a FP turbo that Mitsi liked so much they've sold as an OEM option) Forced Performance.   They seem like excellent performers and are loosely FP Greenish from memory.  

They also happen to be "standard rotation" as they are an Evo X option

Edited by Lithium

Here's something I've done 10 years ago. Making custom comp wheeled TD06SL2-20G. Not sure if that became the 20rs equivalent 😂

R33 GTST, Rb25det with forged pistons and valve springs. Turbo was in 10CM rear, Externally gated run on E85 fuel. 

power.jpg

boost.jpg

On 10/17/2023 at 8:27 PM, hypergear said:

Here's something I've done 10 years ago. Making custom comp wheeled TD06SL2-20G. Not sure if that became the 20rs equivalent 😂

R33 GTST, Rb25det with forged pistons and valve springs. Turbo was in 10CM rear, Externally gated run on E85 fuel. 

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Ok thx for the info I think I’m going to go with the regular rear turbine on the 20rx with a 10cm housing and if i don’t like the response I might go to a 8cm I would like to run the 25g just cuz it says powered by trust on it but too much lag lol

Edited by Prof_Finesser

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...