Jump to content
SAU Community

DEFINITIVE HP GUIDE FOR RB26 2023 600HP BEST RESPONSE

Comm
 Share

Recommended Posts

hattori hanzo Community Regular

hattori hanzo

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Comm said:

How much less lag would you get if you went with let’s say a 0.83 housing. Exact same setup do you think that would be better?

I have not backed to backed the G35 900 housing but have on the 6466 - went from .84 to 1.15 did not loose any response and gained a touch more up top. I think E85 makes the old smaller rear housing argument redundant. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
GDZ32 Contributor

GDZ32

Posted
Posted

Plenty of ways to chase response.

- Stroker Kits

- E85

- 4.11 Diff Gears

- 3.7 Final Drive

- Vcam

- Carbon Driveshafts 

- Turbo Choice

I've got a 2.8 with Vcam, Carbon driveshaft and -5's. Response is great even on 98 and relatively old turbos. If you can, drive different setups and see what you prefer

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joshuaho96 Veteran

joshuaho96

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Can I do these at the same time? How do they both work?

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

Doesn't the Focus RS and the Acura RL with SH-AWD do this? 10% is a bit much and it doesn't make that much sense in this application but there are crazier things out there.

Do I have to take my tongue out of my cheek now? My point was very much more that both of these cannot be the same recommendation to achieve more response. Only one of them qualifies, and only for an R34.

Beyond that point, suffice to say the ATTESA won't thank anybody for trying both at once!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • dyl33
      Creative in cabin amp locations

      By dyl33 · Posted

      Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • GTSBoy
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • GTSBoy
      Pillowball/Hardened Runner Hybrid Approach

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • joshuaho96
      Misfire/stalling issues

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Sleepergm
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By Sleepergm · Posted

      Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...