Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All,

Yesterday I had my series 1 R33 (auto) fitted with a 600x300x76 core hybrid front mount. I also had a 3 inch dump pipe installed, a 3 inch hi-flow cat and a 4 inch cat back with sports muffler (forget the brand) installed. All the pipes are mandrel bent.

Driving it home the first thing I noticed was an incredibly loud turbo spool. I wanted to know if others with a similar mod have experienced this or if i need to double check the work that was performed to make sure all the welds and joins are secured.

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48796-super-loud-turbo-spool/
Share on other sites

Hey All,

Yesterday I had my series 1 R33 (auto) fitted with a 600x300x76 core hybrid front mount. I also had a 3 inch dump pipe installed, a 3 inch hi-flow cat and a 4 inch cat back with sports muffler (forget the brand) installed. All the pipes are mandrel bent.

Driving it home the first thing I noticed was an incredibly loud turbo spool. I wanted to know if others with a similar mod have experienced this or if i need to double check the work that was performed to make sure all the welds and joins are secured.

Any help would be appreciated.

Double check that pipes have been connected properly! Can't hurt.

Hey All

I shoud qualify by saying that i dont think the increased audibility of the turbo spooling is a bad thing - i just wasnt expecting it to be such an increase.

2fardown - I have an aftermarket turbosmart boost controller - all appears normal in that regards but will check it over tonight.

Hey Blade

Yeah the flutter is pretty loud - i tightened my BOV up a bit cause it was opening to much and creating that stalling feeling.

I took the car down to Mercury Motorpsort and got them to havea look at it - they said it didnt sound too bad. While i was there I also had the car dyno'ed - it made 157.6 Kw at the wheels, and that as with really bad air / fuel ratios. To rectify this i have to]he car going in to get a wolf 3d system fitted in 2 weeks time with some big gains expected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...