Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here is the thing... We have got hold of a wrecked R33 GTS-T and are building a race car. We are just deciding on what to put all the gear into. some possibilities are:-

AE86

sigma

RX7 series 1-3

bmw 80's 3 series

etc.

We need a car that will fit the engine and box but is easy to replace / fix in the case of an acco.

Any suggestions??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51544-got-rb25-need-shell/
Share on other sites

Yes but a 32 shell is expensive in the first place and replacement pannels are also expensive. Has any one seen an RB25 in any light cheap cars? Remembering that this will be a muck around car it will not have to be engeneered and therefore legalities are not really important.

Well the Nissan Z's (240 & 260) take the RB with no fuss at all. The engine goes in with only a mod to the mounting brackes (as far as I have know).

As far as parts, the cost isn't to bad (would need to be checked) depending on what you get. You can get fiberglass pannes (helps with the weight), and brand new pannes can be gotten from nissan (but are a bit expencive)

VL commodore! Cheap, can run it into walls repeatedly and fix it for $5, cheap, and did I mention cheap? Can hack into it without a worry in the world to fit the rear subframe/front brakes, and if you screw it buy another one for two fiddy.

most of those cars you listed i don't think it will fit(??), hence why its not done.. most would use an SR20 or CA18 in those sorts of conversions as they're smaller and lighter engines that can give similar power levels. So if you really want to do those cars i'd probably be ditching the rb25 idea.

seriously though r31.. $500 u can get a shell, its RWD.. taking everything out you can probably get it down to 1200kg (base model GX only weighed 1300kg or so). Panels and things probably cheaper and easier to come by than any of those you list.

U can adapt the front hubs to run r32/r33/GTR brakes/etc.. LSD's and minispools are available. Latter model gearboxes and engines fit with a few modifications..

do it...

I'd say the tiredest dogged out Silvia Q's you can get your hands on. most of the stuff should fit without too much worry and as you say, it don't need to be engineered :-) so some sledgehammer modification of transmission tunnel etc can be done for anything with clearance "issues". With luck you should even keep that sweet S13 handling.

Already got the R33 managed to pick it up for 3K. hi flow turbo, exaust, boost controller... the usual. it is a compleate car exceopt for sterio and steering wheel. just got some really bad damage to the B pillar, written off.

an early zed would be a great option but they are expensive.....plus you wouldnt have the heart to kill it once youd completed the conversion. what about an s12 gazelle? that would be different. Id love to see a conversion other than rotors and BP series engines in an old rwd mazda 323. thats power to weight. look through the trading post for cheap models such as those mentioned that will accomodate your motor. depends on how far you want to go with it. If you want fun find the smallest rwd car you can find and start cutting. gemini,corolla perhaps?

ke30 corolla, mazda1200, sigma is a great choice, bluebird would also be a great choice as its all nissan stuff and you can bolt in a good diff. if you could find a mitsu scorpion that would also be cool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...