Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Depends on the wheel size...

if its the 8cm then i believe its the 550hp turbo, and the 10cm 600+hp turbo.

I dont think it would be to laggy - on the 6 cylinder 2.5 it should start spooling early 3000 and hit full boost by about 4500.

I have seen one (10cm) on a 2.2 Jun motor wrx and it was on full boost by 4800/5000. So the bigger capacity and extra cylinders should bring it on earlier than that.....

Daniel

I have the neo motor in my r33 aswell, and am looking at getting a TD06-25G (would the smaller exhaust housing make it come on boost slightly earlier?) aswell, though the only bad point is i dont want boost to come one heart beat style, i'd rahter something more linear as far as power delivery, maybe a GT2835 or something would be the better go for a smoother power delivery rather that te punch a td06 will deliver. Another question, what exhaust flange does the trust turbo come with? And with the TD06 whats the best boost to run it, my neo has stock internals, so i was thinking of runnning say 14psi tops, would that be enough to get the turbo working ok?

Cheers.

the td06 range uses a 3 bolts flange pattern which requires the trust manifold or athe flange to be modified on other manifolds, i have seen some mix's with t3/t4 flanges. The td06 is very harsh in its power delivery yes but if u can get the traction it would be awesome, between 1-1.2 bar would be fine

  • 1 month later...

HAs anyone got some dyno charts of their TD06s. Ive heard a few ppl comment on how thye hit boost hard.

I am running a 10cm housing, and would like to go to a 8cm housing, bu tot if the result is going to be a light switdh transition onto boost.

So do they really come on boost that hard, when used with the recommended A/R exhaust housing?

roy. do you think you will lose much power by dropping to a 8cm exhaust housing. although my tdo6 is internal gate it is 8cm i should be putting it on in a couple of weeks.. gonna have exhaust, fmic, fuel pump and a adj reg until i save for injectors maybe microtech or even remap the ecu depends how things go. will let u know how i go.

I doubt id lose power actually. A tuner said i may be able to get away with a more aggressive tune asi have less back pressure so less propensity for detonation...but i dont know if that sounds right in practice?!?!

I would like to try an 8cm, but not if it means wheelspin thru 2md. At the moment with even 1.3bar and what i guess is about 225-235 rwkws i got great traction in 2nd:)

mine is internally gated.. so they do come that way.. they have a stupid wastegate setup tho.. bit hard to explain but not like a seperate flap next to the actual exhaust wheel.. still the same but the extra flap is hidden and.. yea bit to hard to explain. in a way its harder to run the screamer :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...