Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Those are the boards we use for the S14 and work well.

Expensive when bought in small amounts so the group buy will be a good thing.

How is this going and how many more do we need to sell for a cheap price.

We may get a few to help with price purchase. Have you got the address table yet?

Cheers

Ken

Yeah, these boards work in a few cars.

I bought them from Grid Japan and will be contacting them about a discount once I have got mine in the car and working so that you guys won't have a board doing nothing.

Have not had time to pull the BIN file from my car yet :(

ecl,

The main benefits on a stock 34 will be the ability to raise the boost cut threshold, remove the speed limiter, and retune the factory maps to suit australian fuel and conditions, typical gains on standard boost just with tuning are around 10 rwkw.

Doc.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I am interested but need more info on the tuning as I don't know if anyone in Cairns could tune it and would a control handpiece like the Power FC be needed?

Sorry about my ignorance but this is all new to me.

My Stagea is currently standard but soon due a 3inch turbo back exhaust. FMIC and Turbo upgrade.

Hi guys,

Sorry for the late reply.

Finally managed to pull the ROM file from the stock ECU (thanks 666DAN & also DUMHEAD from silviansw.com).

Now all we need is the address file for the rom or try to crack it.

Yes this board will, according to GRiD Japan, work with S14/15/ER34(RWD, 25T)/U12/C34.

I do not have the rom files for the S14/15/U12/C34 though.

I've attached the ER34 manual BIN file I pulled from the stock ECU.

Ed,

Will you still be able to get me one of these? I can help out in locating the address maps. However it is going to be impossible unless we have different binary files to compare with.

Try extracting the Auto one and see the difference. Fuel maps should diff?

Ben, do you have a laptop with 9 pin serial?

The cable needs 9 pin serial to work.

Then we can pull the 34 GTT auto maps.

Give me a buzz.

Ricky, I've put up the manual map's. See if you can crack it ;)

So far when I apply the ECR33 address table to the 34 BIN the only thing that is the same is the rev limiter.

7050 rpm.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

the badbiki daughterboard pictured wont work with other R33/R34 (non ER34) ecus which have a Hitachi H8 chip. these need a special daughterboard which houses the H8 chip and decoder circuitry.

i am able to disassemble and create address files from binary images (things like K constant, RPM and speed cuts if not in the rom editor ADR files are a bit more tricky but not impossible)

that one posted i see maps around 1200- 2800. the VQ is 1200-127F

what is the main chip number on the ER34 ecu? ie what type of CPU

yikes that was quick. yeah i need the numbers (top row) on the big chip of the ecu to do the disassembly. you can see on the second pic there are a row of holes which you solder the daughterboard to

I knew there had to be a good reason why I was stock-piling these bloody R34 ECU's :D

OK the big chip says: LM702D01J

Pretty sure that's it, as it's hard to read

Other printed lines read-

A12-212 750

816B100

the A12 number is the JECS identifcation code. the bottom number would be serial number

the top one. LM = manufacturer code of which there are about 20 listed for LM on chipdir. i think it is probably Hitachi as most Nissan ecus are but could be anything. SR20 ecus are badged JECS but are Mitsubishi chips for example

how accurate are those digits? i know they get hard to read. best with magnifying class under fluro light at some wierd angle to read the writing properly. at worst wont if i cant get it disassembled wont get constants (rpm, k const, speed limit) only tables/maps from doing a rom compare

I'm 99% sure....I did grab the fluoro and magnifying glass :rofl:

The chip also has that "UJ" logo that's in the centre of the circuit board printed on it.

Whoops just figured it...Unisia Jecs! So it's a Hitachi chip

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...