Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've seen some skylines around with what I assume to be "Locked Diffs" they make this skipping noise of the inside wheel while turning tight corners.....

... first of all, is this safe for daily driving ?

Does anyone here recommend a locked diff brand/type ? Are there switchable diffs to lock/unlock them ?

What's wrong with the standard LSD that comes with Skylines ? Or was it an option?

And what exactly is an active LSD ?

Are you able to lock a standard skyline diff ?

I have Active LSD on my R33 SII GTS-25T and this is what I know about it and it aint much.

The Active-LSD uses a computer to sense wheel slipage and diverts power to the aposing wheel rather than by mechanical methods, the main difference is the speed that is can tranfer power from wheel to wheel. 1/50 sec. It uses a similar system to the 4WD system on the GTR but only transfers power from side to side.

I've got a mechanical in mine and your right, they are a bit noisey around tight slow corners. But apparently they give you the best grip for a (two wheel drive) rwd car.

Straight line drags are great, corners are a bit strange at first, but once you realise that they are very pradictable your OK.

They really aren't as bad as everyone says they are in the wet either.

J

  Quote
Originally posted by tlai909

Do all Skyline r33 models have the basic mechanical LSD?

T.

All turbo R33's have LSD as standard. But mechanical locking LSD's are an after market thing.

Some loucky people got the Active LSD's, they are again different to normal LSD and mechanical locking LSD's.

Sooooooo many diff's.........

J

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm looking at getting a manual r33 sedan still deciding on turbo or not.

so does that mean a turbo sedan will have a viscous LSD and a non turbo wont have LSD?

can someone clear it up for me please.

Yeah, standard diff is viscous.

Viscous diff uses property of the oil to limit slip - as slip occurs it get stickier. quickly.

The active diffs use sensors on the wheels, and electronically controlled clutches to control torque - just like the front to rear split in atessa.

with the mechanical... so it locks under power ?

That sounds good... The wet wouldn't bother me as my car is nasty as it is so i take it easy.

But it can be a little unpredicatble at times, so J, if as you said it makes it more predictable ?? Then i would want that.

And that's good for drifiting isn't it ? That's what i'm aiming for over the next 2-3 years as a project!

R31 - yepp, you've hit the nail on the head. From my limited experience (cause I drive like a granpa most the time!), when the back comes around it's very predictable.

From what I've read, the mechanicals are great for drags and trackwork, and even better for drift. They can be a bit noisey for street driving. Some days it pi$$es me off, but other days I think 'damn I love this diff !!'

Like last night overtaking someone doing 70 in a 80 zone... Raining... I drop it back to 3rd and give it 1/2 throttle. It starts spinning the wheels but it still holds a dead straight line.... Unless you flick the wheel a bit of course :)

Meg's - does your's clunk (inside wheel skip) around tight corners when you give it a bit of throttle?

GaryD - Mechanicals only lock up when the throttle is pressed, so they are sort of open wheeler diffs until you give it some go.

The reason why they are good for track work is cause instead of pulling hard out of corner from just before the apex and spinning the inside wheel (typical for even LSD diffs) they will power around with both wheels with a bit of oversteer.

But the oversteer isn't massive and is very easily controlled. Infact most, if not all V8 supercars use either locked or mechanical lockers of some sort.

I was up at Wakefield last friday watching the Brute Utes have a pratice, and as they were coming into the workshop area all of them were skipping the inside wheel while turning tight and slow....

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...