Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have an R33 GTR with a pair of GT-RS's. What can be done to bring boost on a little quicker? The car has good top end power now (obviously), it is currently making about 340rwkw on 1.3 bar.

Target boost is currently reached at about 5800RPM in the higher gears.

The car has adjustable cam gears, but they are set to zero degrees on both sides as we found this to be the best.

All internals are stock, but other mods are:

550 injectors

HKS dumps

NISMO tuned length front pipes

Trust MX 80mm exhaust

Power FC and boost control kit

I have been told that the exhaust is choking it, hence spool up is slow. I tried dropping off the exhaust from the front pipes and going for a run, things improved VERY slightly (like 100RPM), so I don't think this is a problem.

The wastegate actuators are adjusted to be quite hard (crack at about 1 bar)

I don't want to pull the engine out of the car, as the engine is still very healthy (perfect compression and leakdown), so oversize pistons and higher compression is not an option.

The only other option is a pair of drop in cams. What sort of difference would a pair of say Tomei PONCAMS make to midrange power? They make two types, both with 260 intake and one with either 256 or 260 exhaust duration. I'm assuming the pair of 260s would be best for the big turbines?

Are there any other better cams that will fit straight in using standard valve springs and without machining the head?

I would be over the moon to have target boost at 5000RPM. Is this possible, or should I just swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s? I know these will be on full song at 4500RPM.

Also, I'm getting compressor surge at low RPM in high gears, I'm assuming the extra air flow form a pair of cams will stop this. Is this wishfull thinking?

Thanks in advance

Also, I'm getting compressor surge at low RPM in high gears

I'm no expert so I'll leave it to them but do you have a balance pipe between each pipe before the turbos? I'm sure I read in another thread this can cause probs if it does'nt.

Hi Mik, the general consensus from GTR owners around the world is that GTRS's are too big for 2.6 litres. A set of camshafts would help, as would a light port of the cylinder head and an increase in compression ratio. As for cams, 256/260/264 would be OK, keep the lift under 9 mm. I haven't found any particular brand which outshines the others when used in GTR's. Personally I find the 256/260 Poncams are superior in GTST's, but that has not, to date, been the case in GTR's.

Hope that helps :)

Hi Mik, the general consensus from GTR owners around the world is that GTRS's are too big for 2.6 litres.  A set of camshafts would help, as would a light port of the cylinder head and an increase in compression ratio.  As for cams, 256/260/264 would be OK, keep the lift under 9 mm.  I haven't found any particular brand which outshines the others when used in GTR's.  Personally I find the 256/260 Poncams are superior in GTST's, but that has not, to date, been the case in GTR's.

Hope that helps :)

Thanks SK. Are you saying the poncams haven't been good in GTRs or that you havent tried them? I think the poncam's lift is about 9.2mm. Do you think that's too much lift for the standard valvetrain, or will it be okay?

I guess there's not that much else I can do is there? Without taking the eninge out that is. But if I were to do that, I'd sooner swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s.

Thanks SK. Are you saying the poncams haven't been good in GTRs or that you havent tried them? I think the poncam's lift is about 9.2mm. Do you think that's too much lift for the standard valvetrain, or will it be okay?

I guess there's not that much else I can do is there? Without taking the eninge out that is. But if I were to do that, I'd sooner swap the turbos for a pair of 2530s or N1s.

Tomei call them Poncams because they are bolt in (no other mods). If they say 9.2 mm is OK with standard everything else then it must be OK. Tomei do make cams that are not Poncams ie; they need mods to fit.

When I have used the 256/260 's in RB25DET's they are demonstrably superior to any others I have tried or see the results of. I have not seen this same superiority in their GTR cams. They are as good as the others, but not better.

I suggest you give the cam upgrade a try before you swap out the turbos, you might find that it is enough for your tastes.:)

Hi meshmesh, Mark has spoken to me a number of times about his set up. :wavey:

Mik, Your not alone. I have a pair of Trust T517z in my R33, not sure how these compare to GT - Rs, I think they are close in term of total output power (330 - 360kw at 4 wheels on 22psi). I also have a susbtantial amount of lag over the stock items - to be expected. I seem to have full boost at about 4800 - 5000. I have done many of the other mods you mentioned and have been brainstorming ideas to lower my lag time with little success - came to a similar conclusion cams, cam gears, etc. Wonder how quick a pair of 2510s spool up? - pity it would be a massive top end sacrifice!

T517zGTR, a couple of sau members have these turbos, JAGR33 & Ph1, I've for a drive with JAGR33, and yes they're alot laggier than the 2530's, but damn they hit hard. I have a comparison thread somewhere in one of my threads. JAGR33 ended up getting Ben from Racepace in Melbourne to sort the lag out, and so far seems alot happier. Perhaps give Ben a call, a see what he suggest, Ben also built Ph1's car..

As far as bolt in cams for gtr's go HKS Step1's have longer duration with 272 been the biggest bolt in with 8.5mm lift . The tomei poncams have a higher lift of 9.1mm but the duration is smaller with 260 been the biggest you can go . Im probably gonna use HKS 264 inlet 272 exhaust with 8.5mm lift to try bring the single turbo on a bit sooner.

As far as bolt in cams for gtr's go HKS Step1's have longer duration with 272 been the biggest bolt in with 8.5mm lift . The tomei poncams have a higher lift of 9.1mm but the duration is smaller with 260 been the biggest you can go . Im probably gonna use HKS 264  inlet 272 exhaust with 8.5mm lift to try bring the single turbo  on a bit sooner.

It has been my experience that higher lift will help more than longer duration.:P

Yeh i was interested to know this. But from 8.5 to 9.1 would that be a noticable difference ?

That is a massive difference.

I think 272s would kill the idle a little too much for my liking.

SK,

Do you think the 260s would be better than the 256/260 for my application? I think I will drop in a set of cams and keep the GT-RSs for now. If it doesn't work out, the cams won't be wasted with smaller turbines anyway.

I have attatched the GTRS graph from the HKS website. I would love to know what has been done to that engine, because it looks like the engine is making 1.8kg boost at about 5000RPM. I guess the Jap fuel helps because you can run heaps of timing on spoolup.

Is the R34 RB26 a bit better than the R33 version? Or is the extra torque on the R34 over the R33 just due to ECU mapping?

ha I GOT A GTR RUN 260 DEG PONCAM STD INTERNVALS WITH BALL BEARING GARRETS RUN 518HP AT THE WHEELS ON 18 PSI AND WE PICK UP OVER 100 HP WITH THE CAMS AND ADJUSTABLE CAM WHEELS SO I THINK THE PONCAMS WORK JUST FINE

Mick just my two paseos worth not from experience . I think Nissan intended the RB26DETT to run like two 1300cc' engines on a common crank . I look at them as three 430 odd cc cylinders feeding each turbo on seperate manifolds . It looks to me like the GTRS (Garrett GT2871R) was intended for 2 to 2.5L engines in road tune . These turbos use compressor wheels a significant amount larger than the turbine ie 71 and 54mm . The GT2530's use 60mm diameter compressor wheels better suited to turbine (same) . While the GTRS's work better than the 2540's I see them as a compromise just less than the 2540's . I'm not sure what your power and drivability expectations are but its questionable if the GTRS's can deliver . If not you may be able to sell them and fit something that suits you better .

cheers A .

ha I GOT A GTR RUN 260 DEG PONCAM STD INTERNVALS WITH BALL BEARING GARRETS RUN 518HP AT THE WHEELS ON 18 PSI AND WE PICK UP OVER 100 HP WITH THE CAMS AND ADJUSTABLE CAM WHEELS SO I THINK THE PONCAMS WORK JUST FINE

Did they bolt straight in or did u have to setup the shims again ? Also what did u set the cams too ? HKS seem to work best set on zero.

the 260deg poncams have 9.15mm of lift. I'd say they are a good option, you will have plenty more airflow room at 4000rpm onwards.

You want the turbo's to come in 'faster' ie; take less 'time' to hit power. This is appart from the rpm issue. Things like a set of lightened greddy pulleys and the replacement of the factory fan with a davies craig 16inch thermo will reduce the 'time' for the engine to reach revs. As will a good lightweight flywheel and even (if you have $4k or so) a single peice carbon fibre tail shaft (they weight about half the factory one).

A higher flowing intercooler might be the go as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...