Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The 360 is a lot better than 355 cause the technology they used.

the 360 has a lot of F1 design in it, which cost shitload on R&D.

While 355 is just a super car they design for street driven, no F1 technology been used at all.

Ferrari do spend a lot of money they make on their F1 racing.

so buying a ferrari is kind of supporting F1 motorsport.

At the end u pay what u get, but they are not money for value due to the low amount of sales. But who cares if u have money to spend and want to be different?

Your my HERO...  :inlove: 

Big freakin deal. The Modena probably wasnt even running you. 

Most probably just messin around with you so you 'think' yours is fast. If i had a modena, i wouldnt even bother with a skyline. Different league. Kinda like when i let a Mira turbo think i had my foot down on Anzac..... "oh my god.. imy car is faster man.." ppffftttttttttttttttttt...............

im really happy for you man I hope you feel really good, I know i was There and Yes He was trying to drag me.so keep your opinions to ur self, maybe you want a drag too! or i will embarress you . Oh by the way I dont "THINK" I KNOW ya NUMBNUT.

I've just had a dyno done for 230 rwkw shootout mode.  I'm wondering what 0-100 time it might do 'have locked dif & 10" rear tyres'.  I would have thought 5's.  3.8 for 280 rwkw sounds mighty quick!

Remember gentlemen the gtech is about 1/2 a second under/over and i pulled the rear seats and all the heavies off my car to get that figure.i dont care what you guys reckon I knoww what my line can do, how about yours?? Oh and by the way If your car did those times your attitudewould be the same.

im really happy for you man I hope you feel really good, I know i was There and Yes He was trying to drag me.so keep your opinions to ur self, maybe you want a drag too! or i will embarress you . Oh by the way I dont "THINK" I KNOW ya NUMBNUT.

Hmm.... if i drag you,.... will you promise to put it up on this forums too? Promise??? After all, even if i lose, atleast i got beaten by a Ferrari 360 Modena Annihilating Skyline with Jun side skirts and C-West wing right? :love:

ahhh, i believe this thread is about R34 prices not for phatgtst to get on his high horse, and "drop names" so to speak. Dude, you've magically picked up another 100rwkw's as well :confused:

anyways :D

R34's in Japan are quite expensive at the moment, so probably not the best idea to import at the moment. Locally? Would do really well to get a *decent* car for low $30's, say, $32k? But most 34's are actually in pretty good nick, and generally well looked after, so i reckon if you're will to spend $35K you'll find yourself a very nice R34 with maybe a few extras.

R34 = R34 GT-T Manual, Coupe.

Look ALL you keyboard warriors - come out to a Wednesday night street meet (in 3 weeks) or the Saturday night meet in a couple of weeks and do some runs at AIR. There, the numbers talk and bullshit walks :D .... I have only seen 2 other member from here out there - MattR and MattH (Whatsisname) - if any of you guys think you have fast cars, cough up the whole $36 entry fee (for a Wednesday night) or $50 (Sunday arvo/Saturday night) and come race with the real men :P .... there are no excuses then!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...