Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Steve-SST,

 

I have an RB25 with ARIAS pistons, Linished, Shot Peened and Cryo Tempered Rods, HKS GT 3040, HKS topmount manifold, PFC, Tomei Poncams 256/9, 550cc Sards, Greddy/Trust Plenum, Ported Head Iski valves prings, Micks MC bar & plate cooler 100mm, E-Boost and Trust Type R W/G 45mm, Q45 Throttle Body, Q45 AFM, 90mm Fujitsubo Exhaust, 90mm dump & very hi flow cat.

 

Max I could get out of it was 330rwkw @ 21 PSI. (DD Dyno in shootout mode - do a search and you will find the dyno graph I posted)

 

 Since my car is very similar spec to Pauls and Magics -  

 

 If I change from PFC to Wolf - am I gonna get 50 rwkw increase ???

 

 Cheers !

 

/edit  = PS I run 118 mph (18PSI) - but I am CRAP at drag racing :)

 

 

What 50rwkw???

Yours is 330rwkw which is 442rwhp which is the same as Magics run on the DD dyno. His 511rwhp is the different hub dyno which the yanks use. So a change to a Wolf will bring you 0rwkw increase.

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The Drags will tell the tale eh TJ, GOTBOOST will cause the next round when we post Seans next 1/4 times loaded with china made parts on stock motor and injectors.

Seans car will do a 10, maybe a 9. its a brilliant effort for someone who built that car from scratch at home. Seans also one of the nicest guys out, and were all rooting for him to get the time. Tristan likewise, he is a champ and one of antilag.com's more cherished members. he just isnt as well known.

last warning guys. stop baiting each other with stupid and immature comments.

Anything i deem to be off topic will see a warning handed out.

Buster - you should know better, why post something like that?

im trying to let this discussion go but some of you are taking it knowingly too far

Magic1 got 511rwhp at a dyno comp at the WA Salon, enough to win his class at the event. He wins a prize. He did it with an wolf and stock injectors. End of story really. His car is quite fast. A terminal of 120mph is not always going to correspond to a 'dyno' reading in shootout mode, due in a large part to the fact that a dyno cannot replicate the track environment or the odd bad day for a driver or a set of dirty plugs etc.

His car has a engine setup that on paper should be able to produce 500 flywheel hp on a good day without too much fuss, can't see much controversy about that. The standard injector thing is interesting, there is a way of getting more fuel in to do the job (appart from fuel pressure) can anyone guess?

Why people get worked up over dyno print outs beats me. The dyno is a great tuning tool, go in increase the power from where you started and your happy. Dyno sheets work better as toilet paper than something to compare my car with someone elses, I couldn't care less. However I'm often interested to hear about people having success in tuning their cars from a general veiw of engine characteristics that show up in the dyno's measurements.

The post stands it did make 511 on Speedworks dyno and as Tristan said read the following posts and you will find out what it made in shootout.

Speedworks claim their dyno is the only one thats right i think our dyno is but you guys make up your own mind.

Roy Robinsons s13 ran 11.02 and makes about 440hp on the Speedworks dyno..

now lets do it the drag method..

using the drag calculator on ray halls site found at

http://www.turbofast.com.au/Drag.html

roughly roys car will more than likely tip in at 1250kg with him in it..

lets convert that to pounds at 2.20462 pounds per kilo..

2755.775 pounds...

choosing the find HP option, we put in the weight, 2755.775, punch in the et, 11.02, and click calc..

406.87 hp..

seems pretty close to me steve...

lets see what Tristians car runs shall we..

Interesting thread to say the least...

Firstly congrats to magic1, you have yourself a solid power figure there, that is a fact. It's obvious steve-sst is shit stirring, but sydneykid isn't stupid enough take the bait, i don't see him posting any crap. It's evident that steve-sst likes to use customer cars to promote his shop and the wolf; eg, nd4spd, gotboost, gtstvspec, rob77(until things went bad) it's funny how when things go bad its kept quiet, or always blamed on a mechanical failure, not tuning. what about the many other customer rb25dets that have melted? magic1's car is just being used to put sst in the spotlight, i bet this thread was created without even consulting him.

These type of 'workshop promo cars' are usually tuned with 500% more care than your average customer car, because it represents the workshop to an extent. At the end of the day this thread was made to create interest for sst workshop, getting your attention with such a high power figure, using only stock injectors. steve-sst had this well thought out, and knew that it would create a big debate, if he kept his little trick a secret.

As Jay95 has said, isn't this forum to share knowledge of Skylines? If this thread is just to promote the workshop it should simply be closed because this is poor. There can be no other reason to post this power figure, and then keep this technique a secret, other than to expose this workshop and the ecu. I personally don't care how they did it, im not even chasing that sort of power.

Threads like these do not benefit your average user at all, they simply confuse them. If it was as simple as, "use a fuel pressure regulator with your stock injectors and your fuel system will support 511rwhp, like mine did!" thread, then that would be informative, but as far as i can see, this is pointless.

I connected a set of standard injectors to my washing machine and gave it a 100% duty cycle burst of preen on the spin cycle....there was signs of detonation in my undies only...but damn they come out clean.....thats about the best thing i have acheived using standard injectors...hope this helps

i spoke to soon....the detonation was all too much and its since given up the ghost....it seems to have burnt out my bigend leaving severe scorch marks in the lower half on my undies......unable to be rebuilt,sandblasted or built up with stitching....looks like i have to get a cheap low klm import pair of undies(hopefully from a japanese school girl :)) ah well....thats the price you pay for living on the edge.....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...