Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you can in alot of ways. I think you read to many magazines imacul8.  :werd:

I think your heads to far up SST ass.

I looked at ecu's at length when buying one for my last car. Comparing the autonics, motec, apexi and wolf. So i actually do know something about them.

472bhp @ 18psi on SST Dyno Shootout Mode

11.13 @ 126.93 1.64 60ft on Full Slicks 16/10/04

11.67 @ 120.64 1.69 60ft on Radials10/04/04 DC

Got Boost,

Just looking at the times and power you have there.

I remember MattR's old RB25 powered R32 GTS-T running slicks. That ran a 11.3 @ 122mph with a TRUST TD06-19C Turbo, Microtech ECU, Custom Plenum. It made 318rwkw.

472bhp is approx 352rwkw. It appears around the mark.. :)

This is a link from the http://www.japanesemotorsport.com.au/movies.htm web page.

http://www.japanesemotorsport.com.au/white32gtst.mpg

Im not expert that is why im asking questions, can someone answer this?

The difference between the 2 dynos is hub vs rollers....

and one reads PS and the other reads HP

so tristan actually got 511ps = 504hp but that aint fk all so who gives a sh!t

what my real question is, because hub dyno cannot slip at the wheels, could it be slipping on the roller dyno back @ sst a bit to give it a lower reading??

can someone fill me in....to me a hub dyno would have to be more accurate if it was obviously a DD dyno...

This threads just turned to shit now. To many ****heads with nothing good to say. Just jealous ****s.

got nothing to do with jealousy simon and you know it.

ppl want to know facts, not be waved a wank showoff figure and then be told oh we dont want to tell you how it does it.

either share the knowledge or dont state it to begin with.

i know enough to get me by and this thread helps no one.

got nothing to do with jealousy simon and you know it.  

ppl want to know facts, not be waved a wank showoff figure and then be told oh we dont want to tell you how it does it.

either share the knowledge or dont state it to begin with.

i know enough to get me by and this thread helps no one.

TJ u know there is no secret. It has a wolf pnp and a gt30 . you know this so dont make up silly things.

handed out any warnings yet ash :jk:

dont know if ash has, but i will.

guys, theres a tonne of info in this thread, its awesome, but just too much testosterone - chill out, discuss things nicely or i will close the thread and let ash warn as many of you as he wants.

Cheers,

Christian

Hi guys, I prefer to deal with facts that I can see, and I have a dyno graph that shows 438.7 rwhp, so I will work with that until I have some other facts.

Assuming the car has the standard gearbox and diff ratios and the usual tyre diameter, it makes max power at ~5,900 rpm. To me this seems a little low considering the cams have been upgraded. I would expect around 6,250 to 6,400 rpm for max power, so this in itself is an interesting result. The outcome of that is a shortening in the useable rpm range, which will adversely affects its times.

To run times commensurate with the max power, a car has to have at least 50% of the max power available after the upchange (1st to 2nd being the widest ratio change in a Skyline gearbox). The dyno graph shows 420 rwhp at 6,500 rpm and 160 rwhp at 3,500 rpm, this is less than 40% (38% in fact). So in my ever so humble opinion, the car will never run the times in line with its max power until the resulting "hole" in the acceleration curve is fixed or a close ratio gearbox is fitted.

The rather savage drop off to ~100rwhp at 3,000 rpm will make getting it off the line extremely difficult, I suspect it will either be bog and die or wheelspin city. It will need someone of reasonable experience and quite a few runs to get anything like its best. Even then it will still be a compromise.

The average power (3,500 rpm to 6,500 rpm) works out at 345 rwhp, which is very respectable and only around 20-25rwhp less than I would have expected.

Bottom line, based on the max power (438.7 rwhp) it should do 11.6/7 at ~125 mph, but my guess (and it is a guess) would be lucky to get into the 11's at all.

My 20 cents worth.:rofl:

PS; it always makes the power curve look nice when you start it at 80kph (~2,900 rpm) and stop it at 180 kph (~6,450 rpm).

SST is a workshop and as such will not tell any of our secrets but wiil make the cars avalable to any East coast shop thats in town.Magic1 is driving his car around for work as was on sat.

If others cant match this power then try harder.

Magic1 wanted as close to 500 as pos for PAS so we should be pleased he got what he wanted.

R32-GTS... This is the post the caused the problem.

If its as simple as running huge fuel pressures then say so.

Instead of just stating.. 'stock injectors' state stock injectors running x amount of base fuel pressure with a rising rate reg. that runs at 1:1 or something.

East V West net wars.How sweet.

Please Ash stop this thread and after your WA visit you can be the East coasts judge of fact.

enough is enough.

I'll be coming to WA, with (or without my car it seems) and ill see what the story is first hand.

thread closed - ash

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...