Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

r31nismoid. you dont have to pump the clutch to get it to break traction, your coming to perth, you can have a drive.

tristan

nice :)

ill say by looking at that no clutch required!

What makes it so savage though?

The dyno graph shows 438.7 rwhp at 162 kph, that's around 5,800 rpm in 4th assuming standard gearing and tyre diameter.

No air filter I notice, or ducting for it. I don't think I would be driving that around the sand blown streets of Perth, or the soot laden streets of Sydney/Melbourne either.

:)

Can someone please tell me how I can get more then 310rwhp out of my stock injectors with the fuel pressure at 50psi ???

Not me, 310 rwhp = 231 rwk, best I can get is 225 rwkw.:)

Not me, 310 rwhp = 231 rwk, best I can get is 225 rwkw.:)

Yes well 230rwkw is the most i can get with these injectors... They said that my fuel flow was good but pressure drops.. said i might have to hook my fuel pump up to constant power with relay.. does that mean anything to you Sydkid ??

It did make 240rwkw but it was knocking too much.. need to fix the fuel issue before i go chasing more power.

Yes well 230rwkw is the most i can get with these injectors...  They said that my fuel flow was good but pressure drops..  said i might have to hook my fuel pump up to constant power with relay..  does that mean anything to you Sydkid ??

It did make 240rwkw but it was knocking too much..  need to fix the fuel issue before i go chasing more power.

Yep, makes sense, the standard wiring is too small and can't handle the current that a large fuel pumps draws. I use the standard wiring to switch the relay and supply it with solid power straight from the battery. I use a 30 amp fuse at the battery to protect from busted wiring, that's what an 044 needs anyway.

Be careful with the standard fuel hoses, clamps and pipes as they are not designed for 50 psi.

:)

The thing that confuses me is how you get so much power out of such a turbo.

I had the same turbo as magic1 (Gt30 .82 rear), Stock head, stock injectors (hi flowed to make 420rwhp) and this was my power curve.

The 1st pic is the re-tune with new engine. 2nd pic is of the old engine with the tune. As you can see we had to run such hi boost to achieve that power level. I dont know why but i believe it may to with the turbo and stock cams.

Then i see the figures steve sst makes with stock head or less boost.

My dyno was not in shoot out mode not sure if it will make a big difference how ever.

Could some one explain why or how steve sst can make so much power from these turbos??

I dont think it could be the difference in the computer (i used microtech).

My whinge.

I guess it comes back to the turbo - I'm getting 330rwkw at 21PSI - Boost drops from 25 PSI (at 4000rpm) to 21 PSI. (at 6000 RPM) If I run 21 PSI base boost, I get same power - no boost drop.

What my thinking was, that if I increase boost to the 25 PSI, I will see more power - but there must be some other restriciton - can could be Exhaust, W/G, Turbo, etc.

Am running trust Type R Ex. W/G (45mm, 18 PSI spring pressure) and Turbosmart E-Boost - that's a pretty good combo.

I guess it comes back to the turbo - I'm getting 330rwkw at 21PSI - Boost drops from 25 PSI (at 4000rpm) to 21 PSI. (at 6000 RPM) If I run 21 PSI base boost, I get same power - no boost drop.  

 

What my thinking was, that if I increase boost to the 25 PSI, I will see more power - but there must be some other restriciton - can could be Exhaust, W/G, Turbo, etc.

 

Am running trust Type R Ex. W/G (45mm, 18 PSI spring pressure) and Turbosmart E-Boost - that's a pretty good combo.

Have you tried dropping the exhaust? That will tell you if that's the problem. The next test is boost before and after the intercooler. If the there is a restriction there it will cause the symptoms you have described. You may also need to measure the restriction in the turbine, it may be getting so high that it matches the boost coming in. And then there is the airfilter question.:)

Have you tried dropping the exhaust?  That will tell you if that's the problem.  The next test is boost before and after the intercooler.   If the there is a restriction there it will cause the symptoms you have described.  You may also need to measure the restriction in the turbine, it may be getting so high that it matches the boost coming in.  And then there is the airfilter question.:D

Also,

Do you have a blow off valve that could be leaking boost ??

Ok.... I was scrolling though the forum as usual and I found this post by Magic1 a while ago.

That thing that really caught my eye was the "Bigger then factory" are they really running stock injectors? So the question remains....

magic1

Registered User

Name: tristan

Age: 24

Location: perth

Car(s): R33 GTST

Join Date: Jan 2004

Trader Rating: (0)

Bigger RB25det injectors

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Looking for 6 clean RB25DET injectors, bigger than factory. Anyone got any? Please PM me.

Regards

Tristan

__________________

511rwhp - Much more than GTS-t VSPEC

Just trying to keep it between the ditches

http://dynamic-www.skylinesaustralia.com/f...=rb25+injectors

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...