Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33 GTST S2

R32 ECU NISTUNE

STOCK TURBO

FMIC JJR RETURN FLOW

3 INCH TURBO JJR SPLIT DUMP

EBC

K&N PANEL FILTER

Z32 AFM

Dynos Attached.

R33 GTST S2

R32 ECU NISTUNE

STOCK TURBO

FMIC JJR RETURN FLOW

3 INCH TURBO JJR SPLIT DUMP

EBC

K&N PANEL FILTER

Z32 AFM

Dynos Attached.

Second sheet bit under 13psi

post-57979-1276569431_thumb.jpg

post-57979-1276569441_thumb.jpg

Hey guys, been a long time since i had another skyline!!:)

96 r33 s2

rb25det unopened 105800kms

splitfire coils

bosch pump

660cc inj

hks gtrs

front mount

3" exhaust

pfc

e-boost 2

310.9hp at 14.5 psi

or 230kw? at 14.5psi

pretty happy with it. Going for retune soon. will update.

  • 2 weeks later...

update:

RB25 NEO - Internally stock except for Type B pon cams

600cc inj

Nistune

FMIC

044 pump

3076R turbo with AM Performance manifold

44mm Tial gate

Fuel is 50/50 mix of E85/bp98

Boost 16 psi

358 rwkw :)

fuel is insane... was making 315 rwkw on 1.4 bar with petrol before... got bigger gate and then changed to fuel mix and can put in an extra 15 degrees of timing in at FULL load... awesome!

img0030bs.jpg

518rwhp@20psi and 573rwhp@25psi with a GT35R w/ 1.06a/r exh housing

-Engine management

Vipec

-Boost ran and Fuel used

20psi on pump and 25psi on csr e85

-significant engine mods

Fully built engine and all supporting mods

DSC06167.jpg

DSC06172.jpg

DSR3540J82

RB25DET NEO

410KW @24PSI Dyna Pack

360KW @24PSI Roller Dyno

Car was tuned causing problems for the tuner. Stating the crank angle sensor was failing ( see BLUE for Dyna Pack )

Car was taken home. While on way home decided to visit speed Source for second opinion. he did a run ( see blue ) Then stated is not the sensor its the tune. Then showing me 30 seconds of improve pulling out much of the lopp drop off around 320KW.

Car will be taken back for Tune with speed Source later on this week to pull out dent and lift threw power curves.

sinco.jpg

sinco2.jpg

p1030712.jpg

p1030811.jpg

p1030818.jpg

Edited by dsrturbo

rb25 s2 motor

pfc

avcr @ 10.8psi

malpassi reg

walbro intank

return flow fmic

full exhaust

hks 2530

205rwkw...going back for a retune and more boost with new coilpacks

didnt get a dyno sheet for it. will do for next one... full boost by around 2500rpm :(

hoping for ~ 240 @ around 1.3 bar

Hey guys, Ive got a Series 2 R33 GtsT, Mine pulled 199.9hp or roughly 158kw atw stock turbo, stock cooler, stock everything except for a turbosmart t piece boost control running about 8psi and a 3inch dump pipe with standard exhaust to cannon tip(dont ask thats how it was when i brought it lol) Ill throw a pic up soon, also dyno day this weekend now with a FMC and more boost should be interesting to see the difference.

R33 GTST S1

split dump turbo-back exhaust with hi-flow stainless steel cat. Kakimoto racing muffler (very quiet)

splitfires, cold spark plugs.

FMIC

Greddy Profec Spec B- 12psi

Remapped ECU chip by Toshi

Pod filter.

277hp -207KW

post-68049-1280726181_thumb.jpg

post-68049-1280726195_thumb.jpg

99 R34 GTT - RB25DET NEO

Custom FMIC

Apexi pod filter

Custom cold air intake / induction

3" Turbo back exhaust

Garrett GT3076 internal gate .82 rear

700cc (ish) high flowed standard injectors

Haltech P2000 ECU (3 bar map sensor)

Bosch fuel pump (?)

Greddy Profec spec B boost controller

Daily driver 'safe tune' @ 18psi = 272.9rwkw

Max power before 6k all the way to redline so definitely has more in it!

Tuned by Simon @ Morpowa.

Tuned the above on a 50/50 ethanol and BP98 blend.

299.1rwkw @ around 20psi. (Having trouble attaching the dyno chart...)

Tried to crank a couple more pounds into it but the intake temps started going skyward and it actually made less power - obviously a restriction somewhere, going to try to drop the cat and see if that helps. Otherwise it might be the IW exhaust housing?

Feels MUCH more responsive throughout the range on the road - ethanol FTW.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys

my r33 gts-t s1 is putting out 195rwkw on:

-stock internals

-stock s1 turbo

-hybrid intercooler

-apexi power fc

-greddy imitation plenum

-splitfire coils

-gizzmo boost controller

I will update once I put my Nos kit, Nitto head gasket, turbo + high mount, tomei intank and forgies

hopefully 250rwkw

sorry forgot to mention Tanabe full exhaust kit

250rwkw on low reading dyno, very responsive (full boost at 3600rpm, 3rd gear on road)

Rebuilt engine (but using oem parts and 0.050 o/s bore pistons), 68xxxkms

gt2871r (from what i've read, equivalent to a gt-rs)

intake (boxed pod), tbe/cat, coilpacks, fmic, pfc+boost module, 32 afm, inj, exh cam gear, head ported/trimmed valve guides, valve springs, 044 pump, alloy rad,

1.25 bar setting

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...