Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a pfc in my gtr and i am very happy with it ,people say the hand controls time consuming but you need laytop to change anything on most others and the metering by handcontrol is extremely handy to someone like myself as with pikehold and map tracking i can learn a lot from a run down the slip or lap of circuit etc. and the only thing they put against it is afm well spend a couple of hours with some well made piping and you'll never have to think of them again cruise and idle control are awesome even when i'm tuned to over 500hp it purrs like a kitty .

two of my good mates have just ordered pfc for there gtrs in group buy $987 to your door

so i think your mad if you look past pfc for a street gtr

pete

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Don't want to side track this thread, but quickly, what is rotational idle??

Drops a different cylinder out for each crankshaft revolution by dropping the fuel at that cylinder.

Doesn't fire so cools down that cylinder quickly.

Very few computers can do that and none of the ones on this thread can( in PandP form ).

Cheers

Ken

The Wolf3D in Plug'n'play can't do rotational idle ?

Is the non PnP model more expensive ?

I'm sure this is gonna bite me but the non pandp wired into the car and tuned will be virtually the same money as an Autronic SMC.

Some shops love em , some hate em .

We like the Autronic product and have good success with it.

BTW , the fastest street S13 silvia in WA runs one.....

Cheers

Ken

I'm sure this is gonna bite me but the non pandp wired into the car and tuned will be virtually the same money as an Autronic SMC.

Some shops love em , some hate em .

We like the Autronic product and have good success with it.

BTW , the fastest street S13 silvia in WA runs one.....

Cheers

Ken

Ken lah..

does this mean there are 2 types of Wolf3D, the PnP and the other version and the PnP does not have all the features?

Ken lah..  

does this mean there are 2 types of Wolf3D, the PnP and the other version and the PnP does not have all the features?

Yep but go here for the answers.

http://www.wolfems.com.au/home

Cheers

Ken

Simon, read my post above re. rotational idle.

Autronics does it , Motec does it, Link does it

Wolf does not do it and never has....

Cheers

Ken

Are you sure you have been wrong before.

Anyone that wants a demo on rotational idle come in we have it sorted right now.

*Sigh*

I knew this was gonna happen.

As per my post re how rotational happens on most computers , that is it drops an alternate cylinder each rotation.

Does the wolf do that?

Or does it just hunt up and down as per 2 of the ones we have had in here?

I have no intention in getting into a war over this Steve and if thats what the Wolf calls rotational idle then that's fine.

Would be better to get the customer to compare it with an autronic , motec or Link rotational and make there descision from there.

On the Wolf website where does it mention rotational idle? This is purely a question and not having a go at you.

As has been stated on previous threads before, if the information is shared around amongst the tuners in Perth then everyone could benefit from the increased knowledge of the product .

The keeping of the information to the main dealer in WA makes it hard for the rest of the shops to tune these things to the best of there capabilities.

Cheers as always

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...