Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh i just did this over the weekend, turned out ok, but i am not sure what the factory specification is for it. Here are my results:

#1 - 140 psi

#2 - 150 psi

#3 - 140 psi

#4 - 130 psi

#5 - 140 psi

#6 - 140 psi

this is only rough figure i am guessing as it was only a cheap Hella Compression tester that i borrowed off a mate and he said he dunno how accuarate it is, main this is that there was no major drop across the board.

  • 5 weeks later...

I picked one up at super dodgy auto on the weekend. About $50 but there were cheaper ones. The one I got had a screw in fitting to the spark plug hole, the cheaper ones have rubber thingies you just push in and try to hold tight.

Of course good ones are much more expensive, $100+

Sorry I don't know the target compression for an rb25

#1 - 140 psi

#2 - 150 psi

#3 - 140 psi

#4 - 130 psi

#5 - 140 psi

#6 - 140 psi

Cheap gauges aren't accurate as Duncan said so these figures are a guide at best. The biggest worry is the difference between cylinders 2 and 4. Nissan recommends a maximum diff between cylinders of 14psi pretty much regardless of engine type, so these are well outside that. I'd recommend getting an accurate compression test done or, preferably, have a leak down test performed which is a far better indicator of engine condition.

Were these tests done with engine at operating temp, throttles open, etc ??

Cheap gauges aren't accurate as Duncan said so these figures are a guide at best. The biggest worry is the difference between cylinders 2 and 4. Nissan recommends a maximum diff between cylinders of 14psi pretty much regardless of engine type, so these are well outside that. I'd recommend getting an accurate compression test done or, preferably, have a leak down test performed which is a far better indicator of engine condition.

Were these tests done with engine at operating temp, throttles open, etc ??

From memory you are allowed around 10% difference between cylinders, meaning between 1 & 2 , 2 & 3 , 3 & 4 , 4 & 5 and 5 & 6 not between 1 & 3 or 2 & 6 for example.

From memory you are allowed around 10% difference between cylinders, meaning between 1 & 2 , 2 & 3 , 3 & 4 , 4 & 5 and 5 & 6 not between 1 & 3 or 2 & 6 for example.

14psi max variation between cylinders is pretty much a universal spec for Nissan engines, and it's between any 2 cylinders not just pairs.

yeh i did it with WOT, but not at operating temp (for obvious reasons!) i assumed the differences could have been a factor of this cos of lack of oil in bores.

the unit i used was about ~$100 and screwed into the plug hole

mine were about 140 too... wel, 3 of em.

Two were 110... and lucky last was 70 :D

needless to say i had 3 stuffed ringlands/pistons. With the 3rd being really farked.

So 130-150 sounds ok to me. Leak down testing would show more though.

as blur said make sure the car is hot when u do it, and also make sure u have a good battery connected, (battery will affect cranking speed and compression readings)

outright readings are not important its more the variation, and if those readings were accurate your engine i stuffed, but its probably just the way u did the test. do it again properly and you should get some proper readings.

as a guide the last compression test i did on a rb25 gave figures between 170-173psi (less than 2% difference) although as i said before dont take the outright figures too seriously.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...