Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

Noob question. Searched but didn't find what I was after.

Just trying to get some information, why is X BOV better than Y BOV. Why pay, say $400 for one, when you can get one for say $100 (just guestimating prices)

Apart from the sound, what is the difference?

Assuming there is a reason for going better ones, does it only matter if you have a decent amount of HP?

Just curious as when I get my skyline I will be doing FMIC/BOV/DBC.

Cheers

Chris

As people have come to expect form me now I will tell you that the money is better spent elsewhere if you are after performance.

The BOV modification offers NO advantage in performance terms. You will find no one providing you with conclusive dyno or timed improvements. The only test I've come across is a dyno test of various makes including the stock one where by none of the aftermarket units improved power or boost holding at all, no suprises there.

Improvements are made in attracting cops and getting defects however. In terms of improved performance in that area they aren't a waste of money.

Thanks.

I didn't expect a performance gain as such, but my understanding was the BOV will release the pressure (obviously) thus taking load of the system...therefore running a 'safer' system. Especually with high amounts of boost (Which I won't be running anyways)

I always planned to get a plumb back, I am not an attention person, I hate attention... but if u get a plumb back how do you know it is working if u cant hear it?

Still curious about the differences in the different BOVs.

If you want a noise dont bother with a blow off valve and just get a POD Filter. They are loud enough. Also most people are turning away from external venting blow off valves since they are really rice :D

Thanks.

I didn't expect a performance gain as such, but my understanding was the BOV will release the pressure (obviously) thus taking load of the system...therefore running a 'safer' system. Especually with high amounts of boost (Which I won't be running anyways)

I always planned to get a plumb back, I am not an attention person, I hate attention... but if u get  a plumb back how do you know it is working if u cant hear it?

Still curious about the differences in the different BOVs.

You have a factory BOV, it's a good one. It can hold plenty of boost , more than your proably ever going to run and certainly way more than the factory turbo can throw at it. If you decide to run huge boost 30psi, you can easily modify the BOV to hold it.

you can tell the factory one is working on the stock ecu because your car runs and idles, it's that simple. You will certainly notice if it fails.

There you go money saved. Now you can spend it on something else :D

rev210 - thanks for kinda answering my question.

to the others : i was asking why different BOVs are better...not that i only wanted noise. In fact i want as little noise as possible.

So if anyone knows - I am still curious as to the difference between BOV's other than noise.

If the stock is good enuff, then i will keep it, but still curious about the different BOVs.

Cheers

Chris

Whats the point of spinners? there is no point... just rice

As far as i know its to do with the rice factor/sound.. and the amount of pressure they can hold...

but no reason to upgrade stock BOV.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...