Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Roy is correct.

A Pop off valve is fitted by the governing body in motor sports and is compulsory, where a BOV valve is not.

Two totally different operations.

POV's are to stop race teams running more than a pre-set amount of boost as defined by the governing body.

A BOV is fitted to help reduce turbo spool up time after a throttle close.

yes i know and they are all bov and proform the same task .whether a car use a vacuvm operated or spring set pressure unit. I personal know of no performance car that didnt run one or the other the WINFIELD GTR ran at 1.5bar bov and FORLUMA 1 IN 1988 were resisted to 2.3bar from memory they blow off valve service the same role as the vacuvm operate and you would gain no advanage to run both thats why you dont see this style on some race car but so say races dont use bov could be a bigger crock of shit

A POV will not vent on throttle liftoff. A BOV will.

They’re not the same thing.

As for racecars not using BOV may be correct. If you think about it, a champ car uses SWOL (Shift With Out Lift) so a BOV is not really needed here, but if the driver tries to turn up the boost to far in a race the POV will stop him exceeding the regulation limits.

As for a road car with the constant lifting of the throttle in everyday driving conditions a BOV will assist in a quicker spool up of the turbo.

A POV will not vent on throttle liftoff. A BOV will.  

They’re not the same thing.

As for racecars not using BOV may be correct. If you think about it, a champ car uses SWOL (Shift With Out Lift) so a BOV is not really needed here, but if the driver tries to turn up the boost to far in a race the POV will stop him exceeding the regulation limits.

As for a road car with the constant lifting of the throttle in everyday driving conditions a BOV will assist in a quicker spool up of the turbo.

It will not give you faster throttle response(boost response)in between gears... if it does on your car then your car is setup very shocking.

Doesnt help me spool up quicker in between shifts.. your wrong .. show me some proof it does.

A POV will not vent on throttle liftoff. A BOV will.  

They’re not the same thing.

As for racecars not using BOV may be correct. If you think about it, a champ car uses SWOL (Shift With Out Lift) so a BOV is not really needed here, but if the driver tries to turn up the boost to far in a race the POV will stop him exceeding the regulation limits.

As for a road car with the constant lifting of the throttle in everyday driving conditions a BOV will assist in a quicker spool up of the turbo.

i didnt say they were the same thing but they perform the same task and champ had blow off valve not pop off valve i can quote published documentation but for any interested parties have a read off FORCED INDUCTION PERFORMANCE TUNING by Graham Bell .This guy is a legend and has lived and breathed race all his life and it is well worth the read.

And someone tell me how a bov is for emissions is has no benefits for emission at all

i didnt say they were the same thing but they perform the same task and champ had blow off valve not pop off valve i can quote published documentation but for any interested parties have a read off FORCED INDUCTION PERFORMANCE TUNING by Graham Bell .This guy is a legend and has lived and breathed race all his life and it is well worth the read.

And someone tell me how a bov is for emissions is has no benefits for emission at all

I will give it a read, thanX for that.

As for now Im off to bed

Sydneykid i would like to tell you your wrong.... very very wrong.

My Engineer told me to tell you that you don't know nothing and suck balls.

If you want his email let me know!

Im not being a smart ass but just giving you some real fact's. Stating BOV"s are useless pieces of shit.

HANG ON, have you got the posters wrong? All of my cars, race and road have BOV's?

Imagine your average joe driving this brand new series 6 RX-7 off the factory floor with the flutter noise every gear change. He would be straight back to the Mazda dealership asking if he has piston slip or has done a head gasket. Laughing

Just in case you are picking on the right poster, since when have rotary engines had pistons or heads? Headgasket? What's a "slip"?

:cheers:

I've read bits and pieces of Graham Bells FIPT, this isn't exactly on topic (and could start another sh!t fight), and i seem to remember it mentioning a race team who set their engines up to run no wastegates and instead use pop-off valves to regulate boost...

...i guess my point is (if i have one): just because race team X swears by method Y, it might'd be the greatest thing out there, and it sure as hell doesn't mean it translates well to the street.

Porsche make some awesome machines but you can't hold up what they do (or did years ago) and preach it to be gospel.

I think it's safe to say F1 is the pinnacle of N/A engine development and if only they'd bring back the turbos we could add those teams to the discussion. Which leaves WRC and Indy at the top of the current Turbo field (shame there's no more Pikes Peak or Group N) so i'd be interested to hear what those RACE teams run BOV-wise. Please, and i'm sure someone will, correct me if there are higher level race categories out there... we've already discussed LeMans 24Hr and to be fair that's a single race not a category IMHO.

Edit: Shows how much i follow Indy, looks like they run N/A V8's now, when did that happen?

I've read bits and pieces of Graham Bells FIPT, this isn't exactly on topic (and could start another sh!t fight), and i seem to remember it mentioning a race team who set their engines up to run no wastegates and instead use pop-off valves to regulate boost...

...i guess my point is (if i have one): just because race team X swears by method Y, it might'd be the greatest thing out there, and it sure as hell doesn't mean it translates well to the street.

Porsche make some awesome machines but you can't hold up what they do (or did years ago) and preach it to be gospel.  

I think it's safe to say F1 is the pinnacle of N/A engine development and if only they'd bring back the turbos we could add those teams to the discussion. Which  leaves WRC and Indy at the top of the current Turbo field (shame there's no more Pikes Peak or Group N) so i'd be interested to hear what those RACE teams run BOV-wise. Please, and i'm sure someone will, correct me if there are higher level race categories out there... we've already discussed LeMans 24Hr and to be fair that's a single race not a category IMHO.

Edit: Shows how much i follow Indy, looks like they run N/A V8's now, when did that happen?

F1 car's didnt have BOV's. Because they dont help your car in ANY WAY. Not even throttle off and on boost repsonse, and especially not turbo life.

WRC's car's dont run BOV's they run pop-off valves, just to regulate them in boost.. nothing else.

BOV"s are JIBBERISH!

point of thread: doridori32 doesnt like BOVs, so neither should you

Thread close

No, many people dont use BOV. Spend the money on something that is going to give you performance for your dollar.

with the 500$ or so you spend on a BOV you could buy yourself sticky tyre's or something else!!

F1 car's didnt have BOV's. Because they dont help your car in ANY WAY. Not even throttle off and on boost repsonse, and especially not turbo life.

WRC's car's dont run BOV's they run pop-off valves, just to regulate them in boost.. nothing else.

I've done a fair bit of searching on WRC cars and found very little info. on their engines, care to point me in the direction of some info. sources to back your claims?

I have some articles on rally cars, they never mention specifics of ancillaries though...manily drivetrain and aero changes etc etc. Plenty of pics of engines though, and i have found it tough to find what may look lik e a BOV...i know the Grp N rally cars do.

LOL...someone will freak when i install a 2nd BOV on my car:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...