Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33 turbos are built by hitachi I think, they have a t3 flange with internals about the size of a t28 but are neither t28 or t3. I have also heard that the compressor wheels on R34 turbos are acutally nylon! This info is from letter written by HPI in response to similar questions ask as you have, and the response was posted on this forum somewhere, or it might have been SDU?

I dont recomend running more than 1bar on standard RB25DET due to its high compression ratio!

Hiflowing your standard turbo can be reliable and PROVEN horsepower gainer without any other turbo mods...Providing you find someone that can Build u a good quality hiflo unit just dont ask me........:eek:

Im sure that the rear wheel is ceramic,Just the front wheel is titanium.Also ive heard some ppl say that r33 turbo's are t28 and other ppl say there t3 ,then ive heard t3 with t28 internals! Can anybody clean the issue up?

The RB25DET from the R33 and the RB20DET from the R32 GTST have a Bolt pattern which is the same as a Garrett T3. Therefore it is known by the public as a T3.

However, the internals are about the same size as that found in a Garrett T28.

So the turbo on your R33 can be replaced with another turbo which has a T3 bolt pattern (flange)

There are 100's of different spec turbos that could be called a T3 but the internals are going to be different from one another so you have to be specific on compressor trim and A/R numbers and so on to identify them properly.

The turbo's on the R34GTT are once again T3 bolt pattern.

The inlet (compressor)blades are made out of a NYLON material of some sort but the exhaust wheel is still ceramic like all the ones before it.

To be able to run like 1 - 1.5 Bar of boost on any standard skyline engine is going to cause issues.. it would definitly have to be a turbo with steel wheels and I don't think that this is going to be CHEAP as you want it to be.

The R33 turbo rebuild is a good idea.. probably still cost over $1000 though.

yer i dunno what to put on though

a gt series id say ... but i got to research it more i would like to keep the t3 bolt on pattern so i dont need a new manifold.

there was one that chip torque mentioned to me yesterday but i cant remember what model it bolted straight on and dont need external wastegate

you cana also get a t3 mark the hiflowed stock turbo's from gcg in sydney should do the job you want they come in either ballbearing or non ballbearing the latter being cheaper and are rated at 450 @ the flywheel. you have the set up to cope with this I would go for either the stage one or stage 2 it bolts straight up with no fiddling which can cause issues with some of the other off the shelf new turbo's and it still retains the internal waste gate. a hiflow t3/4 is also an option and can be gotten band new. you would want some thing with a 55 mm compressor wheel andsimilar sized exhaust wheel you could go up to 60mm as well but it would be a bit laggier.

meggala

glad to see your finally getting to this stage. cause you ahve done all the preliminary work

Originally posted by Mark0

hrmm got to weigh up if it is wrth spending that much on high flow or just get a new turbo for 2500

What turbo for 2500?

A new OEM Nissan ? then u get no power increase..

GT type BB turbo? then you will need new oil and water lines new Dump pipe and Adapter/spacer for the Giant compressor cover so it doesnt hit the Manifold.

I wanted to go a GT25/30 but it worked out to be $5000 including an Upper steampipe manifold which i thought was a bit much ;)

well i think i might keep use my cash to put in a 5sp.I Didnt think it would have been that exspensive for a upgrade.Aleast with a manual i can have some fun drifting!!!Its a **** drifting in auto and puts heaps of stress on the box.Someday ill have a T66 sitting under my bonnet ,but not for a while ;)

HKS GT2530 or HKS GT2540 would be a nice conversion (depending on how much power you want to make)

You can either get a T3 or a T2 flange on them T3 is what you want tho, & it will bolt into the manifold easily, im not sure about clearning everything but i cant see that being a big hassle since its not that big of a turbo.

I wanted to go a GT25/30 but it worked out to be $5000 including an Upper steampipe manifold which i thought was a bit much

Why would it be $5000?

I have heard people fitting a 2530 stirhgt into there factory manifold with no problems at all but the oil lines which dont cost more then $100-200 if that! & the turbo are an internal gate turbos.

Ohh..

Sorry that was the price for GT30 with Ext gate your right......

The GT25/30 im referring to is the garrett unit with gt30 comp wheel but with the .70 comp cover it hits the exhaust manifold apparantly.

In that case u will need Turbo, new manifold, New Dump pipe, new oil and water lines new inlet and outlet piping on Compressor..

So i just opted to keep the Standard exhaust housing with a t4 front end so all i had to change was the wastegate brackets and both inlet and outlet of the t4 compressor, havent started it yet hopefully finished tonight :cool:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...