Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I guess if what you said wasn't slanderous, there shouldn't be any problems as people are entitled to their opinions and thats what makes us all individuals.

As long as you're making it completely clear that you're only doing this to appease someone else, which means that its a false apology, it's all good :cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61117-apologies/#findComment-1155847
Share on other sites

my apologies for some of my behaviour on here recently. i have damaged the trust put in me by some.

i hope this is one of the first steps on the path to regaining it and showing sincerely that im sorry.

tj

wow.. you're like the coolest virgin i know..

good on ya mate :cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61117-apologies/#findComment-1155873
Share on other sites

Well,

I think it's terrible that Tom here can't have his own opinion on something/someone that has had a great deal to do with Skylines, SAU and SAUWA.

Anyway, I've put waaay more than my two cents in a thread that I know nothing about.

Jason.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61117-apologies/#findComment-1155876
Share on other sites

I totally agree with u there uneekwahn. I missed all the hubub and didnt get in before it was deleted but i think i still got the jist of it.

Unfortunately this is a public forum and the right to free speach does not apply. We cant have everyone coming on to badmouth the guy down the street about the fact that he sold him a bag of oranges with 2 apples in it now can we. Most of the time you can say what you want to say or insinuate something that u are not allowed to say but all out sledging matches just screw everything for everyone.

I agree with the "no one cares" thing. People you meet in person generally behave nothing like what they do online, completely different world. Ive never held anything against anyone ive met from the forums and then know in reality and i hope i never will.

Well unless they badmouth my fluffy dice that is.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/61117-apologies/#findComment-1156329
Share on other sites



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...