Jump to content
SAU Community

Supercharged skylines


Recommended Posts

Unless you spent big bucks on a decent supercharger (whipple twinscrew) I really don't think it is worth it.

Those little airpumps that hang off the side of the motor are gay & lack efficiency at the top end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are a few R31's that are super charged, can pull about 130 kws with about 10 psi (correct me if im wrong)

Thats funny. :D

Drop a RB25 head on a RB30 with a set of rb25 pistons to bring the comp up to 10.5:1 and you see that kind of power. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mashrock

rb26dettr

twin turbo supercharged..

now thats nice.

there are massive advantages of a setup up like this.

you can use a spuercharger for all the downlow boost. and have either one or two massive snails to finish off the job, if i had the money and time i would try and do something similar..

here's a photo..

i havnt really found any info on this motor ever tho.. if anyone could help??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know why they call supercharges parasites.

 

Checking out one of the whipple flow maps I noticed to flow 500-600cfm it sucks around 40hp.

Yes, but, with a turbo you are also losing a lot of power due to the extremely high exhaust backpressure (usually a little higher than the boost pressure).

Where's Warpspeed when you need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went throught the supercharging thing on in line 6 cylinder engines back when the dinosaurs roamed the earth. Admitedly that was on Holden Red motors. I really carnt see why it carnt be done now even better with the multi valve twin cam engines of today.

Considering my motor was making 497hp and 523lbs/ft of torque on pump gas and even more on alcohol !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nissan made a car (cant remember which one - one of those small cc jap race cars) that had both a supercharger and a turbo on it. The supercharger would give it the botton end power then as the revs rose and the turbo came onto boost it would change over to the turbo.

A supercharger has all of the advantages that a Tubro has as disadvantages(ie good at the bottom, running out of puff at the top, no lag, turbo has no reall loss of power at the bottom end, but the supercharger takes power from the bottom end of the rev range)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That last number you quoted is right about where I'm stuck, pretty spot on. Now let me share some of my Dyno results. Stock cams, stock fuel pump, stock MAFs, stock injectors, same exhaust and everything else oh yeah I forgot to add tomei FPR, intake cam advanced 2 notches, exhaust retarded 1 notch. Let's call this Dyno 01.  
    • @Murray_Calavera I forget but it's well within the duty cycle limits, my tuner is probably the only guy I trust locally to tune, definitely not the best but with his knowledge and experience, definitely the best here IMHO. He said it's the most he could get out of it on the last session (cam change) and increasing the boost wouldn't give much more gains. Yeah, definitely plan on upgrading to Link G4X or similar but I'd like to max out my setup first which I believe many have done so around 500hp.
    • Yeah, so I think that is the point. If you presume a 25% lower reading on a chassis dyno than what the engine is making, then the most you would see from a 720HP engine is ~550wHP. "Lose" a little more because AWD dyno and the number will be lower. Call a hub dyno "wheel HP" and you should see higher numbers. But the horses would be a different size. And as Murray says above - an imposed 90% DC limit drops 550 down to 500 straight away. 80% takes you down to ~450.
    • Sounds reasonable to me.  Do you know what your injector duty cycle is? I guess everyone has their own personal limit as to how high they want to flirt with 100% duty cycle, but who knows what your tuners limit is. Maybe they like to cap it at 80%? Now your injector CC to HP conversion has a 20% hair cut on it, then through drivetrain losses, yeah 500rwhp seems ok to me.  If you plan to spend on your GTR, modern injectors and a modern ECU will go a long way! 
    • @GTSBoythanks for replying. That's realistic and I always believed in the injector-hp rule of thumb. I am however making way less than that 😕 My guestimate/goal for the setup is a reliable 500rwhp, R33 gtr, seems realistic enough doesn't it?
×
×
  • Create New...