Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the advice. I was only hoping to go to 10psi. But really I just wanted to not have the solenoid earthed all the time and have some adjustability there. I'll let you know how I go with the $15 needle valve. Do you guys have pressure gauges with peak hold on them? I was just going to pick up a cheap pressure gauge to verify that I'm not running too much boost when I play with the boost levels.

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yeah, I been meaning to ask, all you guys playing with the IEBC, do you have boost gauges?  Does one need one with the IEBC?

Yes and Yes, they're invaluable, you don't need a peak-hold one but it'd sure make life easier. But then if you do it way too high showing a peak of 20psi might mean it's already too late.

You just need to use a straight stretch of clear road, put the foot down and keep an eye on the gauge while setting it up, back off if it's climbing too high. Obviously you need to pay attention to your driving too so it's far better to have an assistant watching the gauge if you can arrange it.

Hi guys,

I've just ordered a IEBC, DFA and hand controller that im going to build over the easter break (hopefully). As i have a r32 gtst, i suppose i need a r33 boost solenoid? One question, someone is trying to sell me a PCM VALVE PCM84-03 14956 45L00 of a r33 gtr. will this be ok, or do i need the solenoid off a r33 gtst?

Thanks,

Rhett

Hi guys,

I've just ordered a IEBC, DFA and hand controller that im going to build over the easter break (hopefully). As i have a r32 gtst, i suppose i need a r33 boost solenoid?  One question, someone is trying to sell me a PCM VALVE PCM84-03 14956 45L00 of a r33 gtr. will this be ok, or do i need the solenoid off a r33 gtst?

Thanks,

Rhett

Any 12 volt boost solenoid will do, I would go for a "normally closed" style.:(

has anyone tried the Digital Pulse Adjuster on the HICAS signal? I've made up a small circuit that can reverse the HICAS signal, but I'm quite convinced that with the right setup the DPA can be used to cancel HICAS completely.

has anyone tried the Digital Pulse Adjuster on the HICAS signal? I've made up a small circuit that can reverse the HICAS signal, but I'm quite convinced that with the right setup the DPA can be used to cancel HICAS completely.

If you want to completely cancel HICAS why wouldn't you use a lock bar? <- NOTE: genuine question not retorical.

Would the fuel adjuster work ok with a bigger turbo and front mount on R33.  I.e if you were wanting about 200rwkw?

I am intending to use the DFA and IEBC for 200 4wkw via a GCG Ball Bearing Hi Flow and I see no reason why it won't work. Plus I have achieved this power figure on a number of cars using an SAFC and the DFA is arguably superior.:rofl:

better than a SAFCII? would i be better off selling my SAFCII and getting one of these?

only problem is i don't think my mechanic would know how to use one ... I'm fine installing it myself but i don't have access to a dyno and if i did wouldn't know what i was doing!

I am intending to use the DFA and IEBC for 200 4wkw via a GCG Ball Bearing Hi Flow and I see no reason why it won't work.   Plus I have achieved this power figure on a number of cars using an SAFC and the DFA is arguably superior.:rofl:

Hey SK, I've read all about the DFA in the SC book, and know exactly how it works (systematically and electronically). But how does a SAFC work? Does it just morph the incoming AFM voltage for differing 'load' points (AFM voltages) as the DFA does, or does it have other inputs such as injector duty cycle?

Does it suffer the same drawback of causing an advancing of timing due to the ECU thinking the mixture is lean if the AFM voltage is reduced? (Which can be overcome with another DFA being used to morph the CAS (Crank Angle Sensor) 0-5v voltage, or just rotating the CAS retarded a little)

I'm just wondering how it is better than an SAFC :P

I should be receiving the kits soonish from funky's group buy so am eager to get into the tuning. :rant:

Hey SK, I've read all about the DFA in the SC book, and know exactly how it works (systematically and electronically). But how does a SAFC work? Does it just morph the incoming AFM voltage for differing 'load' points (AFM voltages)  as the DFA does, or does it have other inputs such as injector duty cycle?

Does it suffer the same drawback of causing an advancing of timing due to the ECU thinking the mixture is lean if the AFM voltage is reduced?  (Which can be overcome with another DFA being used to morph the CAS (Crank Angle Sensor) 0-5v voltage, or just rotating the CAS retarded a little)

I'm just wondering how it is better than an SAFC :(

I should be receiving the kits soonish from funky's group buy so am eager to get into the tuning. :)

You will note I did say "arguably superior". The DFA has 125 load points and each load point has 100 steps, plus you can have wide steps or narrow steps (by changing the jumper). The DFA can do a mass change, at all load points, good for upgrading injectors or an AFM, then you fine tune each load point. The accuracy and stability of the DFA looks to be 100%, which is no different to an SAFC.

As for tuning, I have used both SAFC (a number of times) and DFA (once) and the tuning process was exactly the same. Use the up and down buttons to change the A/F ratios and use the left and right buttons to move to the next load point. I can't see that the DFA would be any harder for a tuner to use. It just has more load points.

In execution an SAFC and a DFA are exactly the same, they change the AFM voltage to "trick" the standard ECU into going to a different point on its A/F and ignition maps. The AFM voltage is the reference point for both maps, so whether you use a DFA or an SAFC you are going to get both fuel and ignition moving load points simultaneously. It could be argued that because of its superior number of load points and very fine tuning, the DFA is able to get the best compromise load point for both fuel and igntion. But it's still a compromise.

Sure you can retard the CAS to avoid pre-ignition under load and high boost, but that retards the ignition EVERYWHERE. This means you are compromising the speed of the boost buiild and response at times of low load and low or zero boost. In the end it is simply a matter of choosing which compromise you are happiest with. But it's still a compromise.

Hope that answered your questions:cheers:

What's next for my Stagea..............

This weekend I will be swapping the 3.25" exhaust off the R32 GTST (it's getting a 3.75" titanium one) onto the Stagea. Sometime next week I will slot the Stagea onto the 4wd dyno and see what effect the exhaust upgrade had. Maybe a little more tuning of the DFA and bit of boost tuning with the IEBC will be necessary. I am also doing the cambelt service and at the same time I will slot an Apexi adj exhaust camshaft pulley on. If it arrives from Nengun before I get it on the dyno, I will do a run at zero and then tune the exhaust cam timing for the best average power I can get. It's at 133 4wkw now, I'd like to see ~160 4wkw before I do the FMIC, turbo, split dump, hi flow cat upgrade.

being a complete novice to this....

i'm unsure of what i am to do ... i have a soleniod from a Greedy Profec E01 boost controller..and pressure sensor .. would i need to use this pressure sensor at all?

with the soleniod.. one wire is black one is red....i havent bought the SC book just yet,, but will .. but i think it would probably answer my questions .... anyways

has anyone used something similar with their IEBC install? is it better option than trying to source a rb25 one?

with the DFA ....adjusting the fuel mixtures at each loading points .is it from scratch or does it pick up on the standard points .. and u adjust that? again i should probably just buy that SC book and read it.

Matt

being a complete novice to this....

i'm unsure of what i am to do ... i have a soleniod from a Greedy Profec E01 boost controller..and pressure sensor .. would i need to use this pressure sensor at all?

with the soleniod.. one wire is black one is red....i havent bought the SC book just yet,, but will .. but i think it would probably answer my questions .... anyways

has anyone used something similar with their IEBC install? is it better option than trying to source a rb25 one?

with the DFA ....adjusting the fuel mixtures at each loading points .is it from scratch or does it pick up on the standard points .. and u adjust that? again i should probably just buy that SC book and read it.

Matt

Angry, check up on the way the solenoid works because basically the only requirement of it is that it is driven by a 'PWM' (Pulse Width Modulation) signal, which just basically means a voltage that switches on/off (or high/low), and the amount of time it spends in the 'on' state versus the time it spends in the 'off' state is called the Duty Cycle. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation :(

If it is, then you can use it. You won't need the pressure sensor, unless you were to hook it up to a gauge or something. The Jaycar IEBC only uses injector signal as an input, and the only output it has goes out to the solenoid. So it doesn't measure boost or know anything about it, but YOU have to, with a boost gauge. All it does is just open or close the solenoid a certain amount (which you set) for each 'load point' (which is determined from the injector signal duty cycle).

I recommend that if you want to learn more about ECU's, AWD systems, boost control or basic DIY/electronics, then buy the book, I have found that just the articles about engine management are worth the 20 bucks it is.

The DFA only adjusts the voltage signal, and by default doesnt adjust it at all, so it's very safe. It has a warning saying if you be silly and change points to be extreme values then you can cause damage, but otherwise you should be okay.

Also, anyone needing a solenoid, I believe my mate, 'halz' on here has a RB25DET solenoid which he doesn't need any more (has a PowerFC boost control unit instead), so PM him.

So do you think for around 180-190kw on standard turbo that you need to adjust ignition.  If you lean it out a little that is using the jaycar or similar.

Every engine is different, but I wouldn't foresee any problem, there are plenty of RB25DET's around with ~200rwk using an SAFC.:(

How much better is a power fc if your only going for 200Rwkw or running standard turbo?

Does it cost more to tune a power fc properly?

I am only using the DFA because the Stagea is an auto, if it was a manual it would already have a Power FC in it. There is NO comparison, the Power FC enables me to tune everything, there are NO compromises, like the A/F ratio versus ignition timing that I have to make with an SAFC/DFA.

Yep, it will cost more to tune a Power FC. The DFA took me 20-30 minutes to actually tune, plus loading and unloading time, say $100 in dyno time. The Power FC would take me 2-3 hours (I am not a good tuner), so that would be $300-$400 in dyno time. But worth every cent.

:(

Sure you can retard the CAS to avoid pre-ignition under load and high boost' date=' but that retards the ignition EVERYWHERE. This means you are compromising the speed of the boost buiild and response at times of low load and low or zero boost. In the end it is simply a matter of choosing which compromise you are happiest with. But it's still a compromise.

What about those of us without boost??

Does retarding the CAS compromise anything in the NA cars. I've got a CA18DE in my little Nissan Exa, and I'd love to see if anyone has some mapping exmaples for the DE. Other than using a wide band O2 sensor, how do you tell if you're mapping is too rich or too lean. I know it adjusts it over 128 points, but is the adjustment relative to load for example 5% at any load point anywhere across the rev range, or is it a + x.xx voltage at any loading in the rev range. If its absolute and not relative, how would you ensure you are mapping correctly for light load and not too lean or rich for heavy load?

I've read the stuff on the jaycar website. Perhaps you should put me down for the book as well, I'm told its a good read. Can anyone help clear this up for me? Also, can anyone (who knows what they are doing) put up a map for a CA18DE (I know that different cars will need different maps, ie FWD vs RWD, but it'll give me a starting point)

Jase....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...