Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the airtemp sensor for the djetro kit is an optional part for some cars that done have a factory airtemp sensor

greenline have the part # on their website - check it out

you should use this on the 26 detro PFC and connect it to whatever the airtemp sensor wire is on the RB26 loom

as this will allow airtemp correction for intake temps, the sensor should be either in the plenum, throttle body piping or just after the intercooler

if it was me, i would put it just after the intercooler

for the twin map sensors im pretty sure you splice them into the AFM signal inputs on the RB26 loom

check the specific djetro manual and make sure you get it right, if you get it wrong you face shoritng out everything (throw it in the bin)

you can splice up the output from the map sensor and run it into both map sensor inputs on the RB26 loom to the PFC so both PIM-1 and PIM-2 have the same value

i would only see a need to run one map sensor on the Rb25 engine as i think the Rb26 uses twin map sensors as it previoulsy had twin afms so it was possibly to hard for apexi to recode the complete logic to suit 1 map sensor and because its got individual throttle bodies so it runs an average across both map sensors to get a more accurate reading, you shouldnt have this issue on rb25 as there is only one throttle body

the 02 sensor as its a RB26 PFC will expect R32/R33 GTR style sensor as you have GTST it wont work correctly

youll either need to run without 02 feedback completely or change your 02 sensor to the GTR style 02 sensor

if you go for NGK BNR32 style 02 sensor you can set "02 registered" in function select to run in BNR32 mode

otherwise get a GTR33 sensor and leave 02 reg off but have 02 feedback on and it should be ok as long as you have the same GTR33 sensor

you can splice up the output from the 02 sensor and run it into both 02 sensor inputs on the RB26 loom to the PFC so both 02-1 and 02-2 have the same value

thanks mate. Is there any bad side effects of running no 02 sensor with a djetro? Or would it be worth buying a gtr32 one?

Edited by choku_dori
hello i have a 95 nissan 240sx S14 the US version of the S14 silvia and i have recently installed a R34 NEO engine in it and i am running it witha power FC . i have since got it up and running and i am now in the tuning stages but i have unfortuantely stumled across another hurdle. in the snesor check function i have a highlighted sensor which i believe is for the traction control system. its labeld as THRM and its reading 5.11 volts...i nologer am running the factory intake plenum nor the factory throttel body i have installed a greddy plenum and a Q45 throttle body...if this is for the traction control system is there a way i can fool the Power FC to make the sensor light go away so i can finish tuning it and get it running the way i like it...please help me out guys...i am keeping my fingers crosses on this one...

thanks in advance

Mark

hi

this is also a question im intested in, i have also removed my tcs throttle body setup, now running greddy plenum ect. but now i need to fool the power fc somehow, or turn the feature off completly. is ther a way to do this through the hand controller?

thanks for the help...in advance and great thread.

Justin

hi

this is also a question im intested in, i have also removed my tcs throttle body setup, now running greddy plenum ect. but now i need to fool the power fc somehow, or turn the feature off completly. is ther a way to do this through the hand controller?

thanks for the help...in advance and great thread.

Justin

i have replied to your pm - let us know when you find an answer ill add it to the FAQ

  • 2 weeks later...

and here is another question...

i put in my Power FC this arvo and followed the great manual that paulr33 has wrote... i put it in, did all of the idle instructions and then came time for a test drive... all went fine...

i jumped in the car about an hour later to go 2 ice hockey @ boondall and it gets there no worries (idles perfectly and response is good) but then it came time to leave and the engine check light came on... wasnt sure what to think at first... so i went to the sensor check page in the hand controller and discover the "THRO" sensor is reading 0V... thing is, drive for 200m and it goes away and a reading of approx. 0.5V is there... go around a corner and the light comes back on... drive a little bit more and away she goes... does anybody know why this is? only thing i could put it down to is either a dodgy sensor or shitty wiring sumwhere...

any ideas?

thanks in advance...

hmmm...

just got back from tafe... started the car and its idling high (1,350-1,400 rpm). im sitting there at the traffic lights waiting and the "check engine" light is on (yes the same sensor "THRO" - throttle is reading 0.00V) i sit there a little more and it goes away (THRO reading 0.43V and rpm down to 850-900) i drive away and no more then 1km up the road the light comes back on... 0.00V again... i stop at the next set of lights and reving high again...

when i take off with the throttle reading @ 0.00V the car doesnt feel right... when i take off with the throttle reading MORE then 0.00V i couldnt ask for anything better...

anyone else experienced this problem? ill probably put the sock ECU back in tmrw morning b4 i leave for tafe again unless anyone can diagnose what it could be...?

the throttle position sensor is loose or faulty

its going to 0.00v which is out of range, which is why the revs jump to 1500rpm and why the engine check light comes on

oh ok...

y have i never had this problem before with the stock ecu?

driving home from tafe 2day, i didnt see the engine light once (throttle sensor -> +-0.36V) but the car kept hunting... 800 jump to 1,400 drop to 800 jump to 1,400 and so on...

ive read the "My idle is really crappy and it hunts around a lot when on idle. What can I do?" in the FAQ, but why didnt any of these problems show up when i first connected the Power FC?

unplug the PFC and replug it back in - be sure you securely fasten it and its not loose

a lot of install problems come from the user not plugging in the harness plug correctly so some of the pins dont connect properly or they come loose easily with car movement etc

lol very true - I had a heap of wierd stalling problems once and stuffed around with everything under the bonnet, battery etc etc.

turned out to be the harness plug was not in straight and didn't tighten down properly. when I undid it and reset it was perfect

hey,

i am after the rb26 intake temp sensor. I rang nissan and he said they dont have them. I rang back and said it should be near the plenum (am i right?) and he said there is a sensor on the plenum and it is called a "Engine coolant temp sensor" and it screws into the plenum. Nissan part number is 22630. Cost is $96.

Does that sound right or is it a different part? I have searched all over this site, cannot find a part number anywhere. I emailed greenline too cause i couldnt find it on their site and they said they dont have them, nor do they stock OEM parts... so im confused.

cheers

ok guys im still fairly new so hoping to get some help

i have a 95 r33 with 2530, fmic, 3" zorst, pod filter and power fc.

now i had it tuned 3 weeks ago no probs it ran fine only prob is that i am getting no more than 250km to a full tank?!?!

also can smell how rich it is running!

now i paid top $$$ for my tune and dont wish to fork out again because the made an error.

also the INJ setting is set to 130% across all 6 injectors is that safe? have only been driving very light load as it is daily

car and would like best economy but 24L/100km isnt right at light load is it??

ok guys im still fairly new so hoping to get some help

i have a 95 r33 with 2530, fmic, 3" zorst, pod filter and power fc.

now i had it tuned 3 weeks ago no probs it ran fine only prob is that i am getting no more than 250km to a full tank?!?!

also can smell how rich it is running!

now i paid top $$$ for my tune and dont wish to fork out again because the made an error.

also the INJ setting is set to 130% across all 6 injectors is that safe? have only been driving very light load as it is daily

car and would like best economy but 24L/100km isnt right at light load is it??

hi shane

fuel economy and complete tune issues are covered in the faq - have a look at the top for the document index

it covers the issues you are having with poor fuel economy.

what injectors do you have? do you have stock ones? i see no need for %130 correct on std injectors

maybe the tuner had some alternate strategy but most tuners dont touch injector correction unless larger injectors are fitted

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...