Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

As i have stated befor i have rb20det with a ecr33 gtr power fc d-jetro

Now i just ordered a boost control kit for the fc. As far as i can understand from reading the boost control solenoid has a plug on it, which a cable plugs in and that cable must goto a standard boost control solenoid. Well the rb20det does not have one?? What can i do. Where should i plug this in or splice it in. I have checked most plugs in engine bay and none suit this plug. Pic is attatched.

PS. the extra map sensor they gave me aswell as the extra cable.... should i just keep as spares.. cause im assuming you dont run 3 map sensors on a single turbo engine!

post-39806-1204591732_thumb.jpg

hi leon,

the ECR33 and BCNR33 powerfc have a 3 pin boost control kit port on the side of the PFC

this is for the map sensor for the boost control kit (do NOT mix this up with the djetro map sensors).

the boost solenoid gets power from the existing wastegate solenoid wiring which is used with the stock ecu.

from memory the ECR33 and BCNR33 had this on the wiring loom as "wastegate solenoid" but the RB20 loom i don't think has this wiring.

If it does then you connect the solenoid to this "wastegate solenoid" wire and the ground to chassis ground.

If your RB20 loom doesn't have this wire then you will need to run it yourself. The power wire nees to run the ECR33/BCNR33 PFC wiring socket on the actual PFC - check out the wiring diagrams to find out what PIN # it is on the PFC and then get ground from chassis ground.

The boost solenoid uses a 12v power and switched ground to turn it on and off - so you can't get it wrong, if you do it just won't work

thanks alot... i half get that, i think ill wait for the_mafia aka pacey to help me out this wkend, but this should certainly be of help.

Just one thing though... were does the map sensors goto now? Do they have to be spliced in with the boost controller map sensor?

i dont know - ive never setup a djetro PFC but i think it should come from the plenum

and i think the boost signal should come from as close to the turbo outlet as possible

Is there somewhere that tells us the "normal" range for sensors? I have been looking through the FAQ and cant find anything.

My car just started hunting badly all of a sudden and idles at 2000rpm when cold, 1500rpm when warm

A/C on or thermo fans on seems to stabilise hunting a bit.

I cleaned AFM, cleaned AAC valve out and then I checked sensors in the PFC hand controller

AFM sensor goes from about 1.3V (idle) to 2.4V at about 3000rpm (stationary)

Air Flow is about 1400mV if I turn that on with the monitor function.

O2 sensor is at around the 1.0V mark too and when hunting ranges from 2.72V to 4V

I replaced the fuel filter a few days before the problem started and it was really dirty would this be a possible problem?

I also went through a big puddle of water and the car stuttered...

Thanks

the nissan ECR33 service manual should tell you the voltage range of the sensor - check out the sections covering consult diag - it shows you how to do each diag and what the ranges should be - of course you can't do consult diag but it will give you an idea of what acceptable levels are.

the 02-1 sensor shouldnt go past 1.0v its a slow and narrow sensor, it should only go between 0.0v and 1.0v

any sensor that is out of range will be highlighted with a black background in the ETC, SENSOR SW/CHECK screen and the engine check light will also be on (orange engine icon) on the cluster

hey mate,

Me and pace got my car (rb20det djetro) up and running on satrurday arvo. Just one problem. Sensor check is coming up error with TPS sensor, We tested the tps with multimeter and it works fine. Do i need an rb26 one?? or whats the go there... the check engine light is on 24/7

Paul,

My mechanic says there's a difference between PFC's made for the R333 GTST S1 and the S2! One designed for internal ignitors, the other for external (can't remember which he said is which). He's going to find out for me today. The PFC I have came off a S1 and mine is an S2....

Paul,

My mechanic says there's a difference between PFC's made for the R333 GTST S1 and the S2! One designed for internal ignitors, the other for external (can't remember which he said is which). He's going to find out for me today. The PFC I have came off a S1 and mine is an S2....

hi,

this has been done to death and covered a dozen times

there is no difference between S1 and S2 - the ignitor differences are on the engine side, not ECU side

so S1 ECU can be used on S2 and vice versa

There is no PFC for S1 and a seperate PFC for S2

hi,

this has been done to death and covered a dozen times

there is no difference between S1 and S2 - the ignitor differences are on the engine side, not ECU side

so S1 ECU can be used on S2 and vice versa

There is no PFC for S1 and a seperate PFC for S2

Whats the difference between R33 RB25DET and RB25DET NEO R34 PFC?

Whats the difference between R33 RB25DET and RB25DET NEO R34 PFC?

quiet a lot

there NEO has some extra sensors, controls and features

things like traction control etc make it in-compatible to a std RB25

i suspect you could piggyback / hack out those items

quiet a lot

there NEO has some extra sensors, controls and features

things like traction control etc make it in-compatible to a std RB25

i suspect you could piggyback / hack out those items

Thanks Paul - I was just curious

Another question - whats the easiest way to knock some timing off with Power FC?

I found 2 options but both are as confusing as each other

:)

hey mate,

Me and pace got my car (rb20det djetro) up and running on satrurday arvo. Just one problem. Sensor check is coming up error with TPS sensor, We tested the tps with multimeter and it works fine. Do i need an rb26 one?? or whats the go there... the check engine light is on 24/7

Hey, sorry to be a pain in the ass but... ^^

Thanks Paul - I was just curious

Another question - whats the easiest way to knock some timing off with Power FC?

I found 2 options but both are as confusing as each other

:P

SETTING -> INJ/IGN Adjust

Press DOWN 3 times and you will see -3 for IGN ADJUST.

This drops the IGN map 3 degrees timing temporary (will reset when car is powered off).

HI.

Great FAQ!

But is it possible to get some more info on all the different settings? Not maps, revs etc... But the stuff in "settings 2 and 4" in the FC edit program...

what effect they have and more on what they do. Right now im still a little afraid to begin playing with these settings.

update today

updated some text on the other versions and version matrix

removed some of the junk in the menu roadmap

removed some of the rare crap in menu tree

fixed up the formatting so its paginated now (easier to read)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...