Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I have some more questions for you guys, just to get everything cleared up, becuase I keep hearing different things from a bunch of knowledgable people. Would rather here it from those that have done this before. I am going to be taking the block to the machine shop and will be ordering my RB26 rods this week.

I am going to be putting some RB26 rods in my SII RB25DET, so here are the questions I have for you guys:

1.I have been told from some that these will fit right in with no modification or grinding down and then from others I have been told that the rods are not a perfect fit and that you will have to grind away the rod slightly. Does anyone know which is true?

2. Do all (R32-R34) RB26 rods fit the same?....are they all the same?

3. Doing RB26 rods in my RB25, should I get the RB25 Wiseco's or the RB26 Wiseco's?....or are they all identical?

***(becuase from what I know Wiseco makes 86.5 and 87mm in the RB25's, but with the RB26 they only make the 87mm......that would creat a problem, becuase I do not want that low of a compression ratio...which from my knowledge...doing Wiseco 87mm for the RB and running a 1.2mm head gasket will creat a 7.9:1 compression ratio (which I am wanting more of a 8.3:1- 8.5:1 ratio))

It depends on the RB26 Rods you are talking about, Are you doing stock Rb26 Rods or Forged rb26 Rods?

I know that Stock rb26 rods fit, with out any problems and Crower Forged Rb26 Rods fit with out any problems into an Rb25 Block, You have to make sure you get stock rb25 bearings though.

If you don't want to change your compression to much, then don't go 87mm bore. Go either standard bore size if you can find forged pistons to suit or just go .20thou over. And with a 1.2mm head gasket you will still be around the 8:5 to 8:3 compression region.

I personally would go arias forged (stock Replacement) pisons, as they are identical to stock in terms of dish wisco pistons. Wich will have an impact on compression.

You also have to look at other factors, Eg what size turbo you are bolting on and how much boost you want to run, to be able to determine the best size head gasket or the best suited bore size.

I am talking about stock RB26 rods. So it doesn't matter what gen I get (R32-R34) RB26 rods...they should all work fine in my SII RB25DET?

I am going to most likely going to have to deck the block and mill the head a good .5-.8mm, to get that compression up. Wiseco's make some great pistons for the money, the only down side is that for some reason they make it dished which will throw it at a 7.9:1 c/r. Decking the block and milling the head down a little should put me around 8.5:1+.

I would go to another piston, but the Wiseco's are $650 (US currancy) and after that comes the CP which runs $780, but I have heard more positive feedback from Wiseco then CP.

For the turbo I am going to be running a T61 with a .83 a/r. Is capable of 700hp, so the top end is not going to be the problem. I am going to have to make up for the lower end power, which I am going to be making custom intake manifold which will have some long runners and velocity stacks...to make as much velocity as I can to make some torque for the lower end.

I am talking about stock RB26 rods. So it doesn't matter what gen I get (R32-R34) RB26 rods...they should all work fine in my SII RB25DET?

For the turbo I am going to be running a T61 with a .83 a/r. Is capable of 700hp, so the top end is not going to be the problem. I am going to have to make up for the lower end power, which I am going to be making custom intake manifold which will have some long runners and velocity stacks...to make as much velocity as I can to make some torque for the lower end.

I'm not sure about the R32 or the R34, but I know that the R33 will fit fine; I haven't compared the R32 or R34 rods against the R33.

I would think that the R32 and the R33 should be identical But the R34 I'm not 100% sure on, Maby some one else could confirm that for me?

As for the head gasket, if you’re going to be running such a large turbo, I would be looking at a different size head gasket? perhaps 1.8mm ?

As you will probably be running around 20+ psi ?

I am talking about stock RB26 rods. So it doesn't matter what gen I get (R32-R34) RB26 rods...they should all work fine in my SII RB25DET?

they will indeed.

SPHYNX[x']aren't stock RB26 rods forged anyway? :S

Nope, dont think so.

Just a better grade than 25 ones. They are also bigger if you compare them side by side.

Lot meatier around the link points

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...