Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise of them to do so.

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise them to do so.

I think it should be limited too. Both dimensions (400 pixels max width) and file size. Makes it hard for 56k users. Not all people know you can turn them off either. Personally I think it's a curtious thing for the users to have a decent sized image.

When I join a bored it's the first thing I turn off. Unfortunatly many people go "see my sig" for a lot of things. So you miss alot.

  • 2 weeks later...

i remember this arguement from ages ago...we were trying to decide whether we should allow pics at all, and we decided yes but to limit the size.

so to answer your question, yes there is a limit...and it's up to the mods at their discretion to ask ppl to reduce them if they think it's too big.

you guys can help us out by sending one of us a pm if you spot one...

and i agree with Shane, having to scroll side to side is a pain in the ass :P

His sig is a link to a commercial website. Surely that shouldn't be allowed unless he's a forum sponsor?

Why pay for a banner if you can just put it in your sig and postwhore? :)

Just increase your desktop resolution.  Im running 1600x1200 and no need to complain. LuKaS's signature looks normaled siezed to me

you sig fills my whole screen.

i use hi-res @ work. but at home i like something easy on my eyes.

and pages long sigs aint one of those easy things

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
    • Out of curiosity, how do officials determine what the OEM ride height and suspension specs are? Do they have a book of truth? I'd think that would be quite obscure knowledge for random JDM cars.
    • This is the check list they sign off on. This implies that adjustable coilovers of the type we're referring to are not a "Variable Ride Height" system. This very much is in the ethos of "I can change the height while moving/while parked without pulling wheels off the car and mechanically doing so"
    • Just an update  ... Put the cat back on no issues with the car running wise ... maybe alittle longer to spoil up the turbo. Still running rich but waiting for my tuner to come back into town to retify the situation. WOT runs fine with the cat.     
×
×
  • Create New...