Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest KILLER-T
Originally posted by skyzerr33

pitty that pintara will hand u your arse

Why would he hand me my arse i would never give it to him in the first place you on the other hand Skyzerr33 would be bent over waiting for him :lol: :lol:

By the way this is all a joke isnt it i mean a pintara wagooon agains a 33 i know who i would lay my $$$ on

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by KILLER-T

Why would he hand me my arse i would never give it to him in the first place you on the other hand Skyzerr33 would be bent over waiting for him :lol: :lol:  

By the way this is all a joke isnt it i mean a pintara wagooon agains a 33 i know who i would lay my $$$ on

i meant that for grim and timmy g

not u silly lol

well I dotn care if they are true sports acar or not m they are improvements of R32 cars... as far as I can teell R33 have nice body!!! and we love it I have to say there are too many skylines around and there are too many skylines wanna be GTR! well that's rice I recon! :lol:

so R33 are GOOD cars and dont like baggin them of RICE cars in general!

cheers

Joe

Originally posted by R33_Cam

ive got nothing against 32's, i quite like em actually, but dont they improve things with each model change?? thats what impression i was under anyway, learn from old mistakes, well not necassarily mistakes but just to better things, if they didnt think it was better why would they change it??

Cam.

true true... nice new RB25 *droool*.

the one thing they ****ed up was the styling, big and bulgy wasnt the answer so it was back to the agressive lines of the R32 when the R34 came out. hehehe

took off my GTR wing tonight aswell, looks MUCH MUCH more hardcore :)

GO THE 32's!!!! :shake: :shake:

Shaun

p.s. this is wrong, this is worse than a holden vs ford debate... same friggin cars, just newer models :)

Lol

Love it

all angry and protective.... true contraversey, I think most over looked his last line....

my favourite response would have to be Grim's line

"yeah. the guy driving the shitty pintara above has no idea".

lol

How many 13sec 2L pintaras have you guys seen ?

Cos I have nothing but respect for somebody who does something different using his head, not his wallet........

:(

tongue in cheekiness

Got Bait ?

The R32 to R33 debate can rage on all it likes. At the end of the day we ALL want to own R34's :(

It just comes down to preference of styling in my opinion. Many R32 gtst owners are willing to put up with slightly less performance from the RB20 simply to have a skyline that they like the look of, and is less common.

Of course then you can put an RB25/6 into it, and have the best of both worlds.

Radium, finally got my car back after 6 weeks at speedworks! (remember i broke it after doing 14.6 at the plex?)

I completely f.ucked 1 exhaust valve and mildly f.ucked the other. But shes pullin like a train again!

Red17

look out of all the gtrs inc 34 the 32 has the best performance the 33 is to chunky so nissan wanted to make the 34 peform like a 32 and have style like the 33. the gts t models however the 33 will out perform because of its 2.5 litre engine over the 2 litre r32.

soo there take it as u will

Originally posted by red17

The R32 to R33 debate can rage on all it likes. At the end of the day we ALL want to own R34's :(  

Well, to keep this thread nice and heated, I definately don't want an R34. The R33 is a great sized car, it your after something fast and small, buy a 180sx, if you want fast and roomy buy the R33:uh-huh:

Originally posted by Duncan

if you want fast and roomy buy the R33:uh-huh:

bwhwhwhaaaa!!

Roomy + Skyline (the coupe's) dont go in the same sentence. coming from a mid-sized sedan, I miss having a boot, rear leg room, etc.

ohwell, I don't sit in the back, so who gives a f*** hehehe!:uh-huh:

Originally posted by GR33DyMANGO

the r33 is pretty roomy compared to most sports cars.

i think of it as more of a 'practical sportscar.'

Me too. There is room for real people back there.

And if you're not happy with the back seat room of any coupe, it easy, buy your own so you don't have to sit in it:D

Originally posted by red17

Radium, finally got my car back after 6 weeks at speedworks! (remember i broke it after doing 14.6 at the plex?)

I completely f.ucked 1 exhaust valve and mildly f.ucked the other. But shes pullin like a train again!

Red17

good to see its back on the road again..

saw a gunmetal 32t the other day with a chick driving it.. mmm mmm, tried to chase her but damn peak hour traffic was a real bitch.

Shaun

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...