Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

that time.. looks like he's taken up to 660ft easy than just said '**** it' and floored it for the rest of track... :D but meh.. i dunno prolly just cause old people cant drive :) yes.. put the seat back a bit.. dont sit on the steering wheel.. and WEAR YOUR GLASSES >:)

hehe jokes all :D

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest two.06l
Hi guys i didn't mean for this to get out of control with the comparison of the toque figures.

just that the car has lots of torque that's all.

we cant compare torque as none have been posted, it hasnt got "nasty" we are just inqusitive people on here....no-one has posted anything nasty?? Can you send me a link with info on this OS box as i cant find any info on it.

thanks Ben.

paul...DIRTgarage.

I got that info from the WSID website. 600hp will have to provide the incremental MPH figures. But yes, I agree, the car wasn't being launched or driven as hard as it could be. That 1.7 60" was its best of the night with the rest in the 2.0-2.4 region. Best MPH of the night was 116. Plenty left in it if short shifting is eliminated and more agressive driving instigated.

Good luck with it.

Charlie.

Chris, any particular reason that the OS was chosen instead of the Holinger? Both are similarly priced.

Charlie.

Rice factor! Hollys with seq shifter were $22K, regular H pattern was $18K. OS is a bit cheaper, or was when it was purchased. A few more reasons, but that was the main one.

Oh and did I mention the 5 OS Gherkin shirts we got with it? And the stickers... oh what a bargain! Pity I'm too fat to fit in any of the shirts, damn weedy Japs :)

Just thought i let you know that the JUN Plenum, rocked up today.it's got heaps of bling factor.

As for the OS box i spoke to BEN from otomoto and he said that retail is 16,500.

i'll get the plenum, quatermile times and the dyno sheet around to dough boy, and see if he could stick them on the net. Thats if Chris would be kind enough.Thanks Chris!

Cheers Ben

Best time:

R/T:   0.939

60':   1.749

330': 4.932

660': 7.621

1000': 9.878

ET:    11.758

MPH: 115.76

hi 600hp was just comparing run

4923scan0004.jpg

at the 330 foot only .05sec difference so to say this was a slow launch is a crock of shit(1.7 60 footer is not slow), and its only from this point on that mine start to pick up time and mph on it. At the time it was running 480-490rwhp but the only big difference i can see is the power curve spread (gt-ss seem pretty agressive but done run right out in the higher rpm where the garrets seem to be a bit more linear in power and torque)

4923scan00011.jpg

So great work and hope to see more of this car in the future on the forum

Hope to run my car at drag combat should be interesting with another 50hp and new tyres and hopefully we might have a experimental gearbox in for the run.

:D

Welll, I am just here to say something...

My fren has a std GTR.. He ran constant 11.94 @ 114/113MPH.

3" front , stock Dump pipe. 4" cat back.

Blitz Twin Entry Intercooler

ARC Airbox

17psi boost.

255 street tyres on 18" rims.

With wider tyres say 275 he will get better traction.. but there expensive:)

Which is why i think that time of 11.7 is not impressive. Mind you its still got std ecu.

He is going to get Power FC and a custom dump pipe setup with intercooler water spray, he is aiming for 11.7 @ 116mph.

Will keep youse up to date.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
×
×
  • Create New...