Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It doesn't cost as much as you might think. We used to have this shifty guy, signed up on a mobile contract and racked up $8k worth of bills. Knowing Orange (when they used to sell Optus network) would probably cane us since we processed him so we went and hired a PI and debt collection agency to track him down. Cost us $450 (that was 5 years ago) and we found him, Orange brought him to court and everyone's happy. If I remember correctly, we got that $450 back from him as well as it is cost incurred for recovering the outstanding fee.

Its not over till i get my money back, i doubt that person would be him - doesnt make sense bank being nearly 200kms from the whitepages guys place.

The BSB is where you set up the account so even if he had move his BSB would remain as the Newcastle one.

Dont bother doubting it, give it a try. Could be a bank account he opened there and has moved away since.

Also, I'm not sure how it works with net banking between two independant people but I know with credit cards/debit cards and a business if you have a dispute the bank will immediately return your money and make the business prove that the transaction is legitimate before giving there money back.

all u have to do is contact your bank and tell them you have made a bank transfer by mistake and only found this out recently...what they can do is make a demand letter to this person to return or transfer back the money.---> this is wat i did when i got dodged buying mags on ebay and took me 2 months to track him down... bank would charge you maybe $50 for this request but its worth it.

Police would take a while to sort them out for sure..good luck anyways.

I'm with Westpac. I'll give them a call and tell'em I transferred money to the wrong account, see how that goes. If no luck, ill try police. But if there are any of you out there who can possibly find out who and where he is via friends at CBA, it would be the easiest way to find him.

Mate, you have been given a website that actually states that the account that you sent money into is theirs (ILR). I would be calling them up first and asking for the manager. Also, I don't think that he gave you his correct name.

http://www.isonliveradio.com/accounts/

Ah yes. My mistake. D'oh.

Anyway, I will check that name out for you, allblitz, but I don't think that is his real name. Wll let you know what I find via PM.

Thanks man. Never knew I would get this much response. Thank's to everyone for the help. Lets just hope I can get the $$$ back.

ALWAYS KEEP ONE THING IN MIND

**********ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS*********

Pay via credit card

Reason---> All banks have Fraud dept which is dedicated for Credit Cards only. Any issue like this is resolved in a matter of few days.

Post his name and account number, I will see what i can do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...