Jump to content
SAU Community

my new rb26 2.8


Recommended Posts

Matt, if you are so desperate for the dyno print I'll ask if he has it.
Geoffrey, you may also refer to my comment above :uh-huh: I wasn't desperate for the print but you'll recall I was not the only one asking why I didn't receive mine.

Anyway if the engine setup Steve's posted about is legit then good for him. Talk is cheap. We'll see who delivers the goods at Autosalon. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Matt, if you are so desperate for the dyno print I'll ask if he has it.
Geoffrey, you may also refer to my comment above :uh-huh: I wasn't desperate for the print but you'll recall I was not the only one asking why I didn't receive mine.

Anyway, if the engine setup Steve's posted about is legit then good for him. Talk is cheap. We'll see who delivers the goods at Autosalon. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just got my new engine and very nice indeed what do people think how much power i would make at the rearwheels in a r33gtst put your info in and i give you the honest power figure? as it follows in mods

 

 

Rb26 stroked out to 2.8

hks crank  

hks rods

hks pistons  

N1 nismo cams  

hks valves and springs

mild port and polished head

hks cam gears  

n1 oil pump

n1 water pump  

1000 cc injectors

100 mm throtlebodie

pair of 3240 hks turbos

and running it with motec m800 ecu  

3 half in dump pipes into 3 inch nur spec r blitz sys

and nice new pair of fuel pumps and new fuel lines tobe put in  

and nismo fuel reg  

 

this it was ive got done and now have all built ?  

as im yet to put it in the car i just want peoples thoughts of what power im going to put out in the rear wheels

"i want my penis to be this big... "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had some failed dealings with Steve. Although he seems like a nice guy, things don't always go to plan. Would be nice if someone came thorugh with a decent drag setup like this.

Best of luck with it.

A call would have been nice though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be good for a comfortable 200rwkw on a safe tune
LOL... you're joking right? my car has more than that with a stock turbo :P

Your a clown, even an idiot could spot the sarcasm in my above comment kekekegay.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Morgs said, there are sevearl Top Secret prepared R33 GTR's running a variety of different turbo setups but yes, the 3240's are capable of producing some big power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm, keep going

If I recall correctly, arent the GT3240's rated at 580PS each?

aint it like 620?

The top secret R33 GT-R ran 3037's, or 3040's i think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This is not really the same thing but considering i was buying an intercooler and piping off him and after story after story about not getting it and a month and a half later getting my money back i will agree he seems like a really nice guy but not sure if he talks a little bit of shit. Though he did speak to me about the engine saying it was true though i am yet to see any photo's

I've had some failed dealings with Steve.  Although he seems like a nice guy, things don't always go to plan.  Would be nice if someone came thorugh with a decent drag setup like this.

Best of luck with it.

A call would have been nice though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if it is true, why would you need to ask the power output? I mean come on, i am not an engine builder, and thats not my engine which is getting built, and i could have a fair idea. No offence to anyone here, but if i was going to spend $10,000's on an engine, i wouldnt goto an online forum to find out what power it would be making unless i wanted to boast..... If the engine builder doesnt know then that would be a big concern for me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing steve for a little while he is the kind of person who talks soo much shit thats its not worth listening to.

I 2nd that.

Apexi TCW LS are in the photo, not 3240's... 3037S are heaps of power, no need to go 3240 on such a small 2.8ltr engine.

Maybe 3.1ltr's but not 2.8.

Steve your a clown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and i got the usual excuse for his car not being at the Autosalons. "Didnt have enough time"

lol. He lied about Buying David Lee's car. Lied about the mods to his car (which he was proven majorly wrong at HIS OWN dyno day, where he pulled jack shit kw).

I ask him for pictures on msn and then he goes completely silent. Someone dreams too much...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*sigh* if you guys read the original post (as punctuation-less as it is) steve was asking for your estimates for the power figure given the list of parts. He was then going to give you the actual figure once it was complete to see how your guesstimates compared.

I don't think he was asking for:

* critique of his choice of parts

* an analysis of his social behaviour

* an msn warrior's review of a fellow forum user

* resurfacing of personal vedettas against other members

* or a parrot's idea of what Chasers is building

this guy's asked a very specific question, and if you don't think it'll work, just say 0kw or don't reply at all. Most of the condescending attitude and useless 2c adding is why this section's gone to the dogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...