Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know how to convert PS into HP? I'm sure 280PS is 208Kw (I think). Anyway, just got back from the dyno day held at Speedworks and organised by the All 4 Wheels Car Club. Managed to pull 273.5PS @ 6608rpm on the rear wheels, using Speedworks new DynaPak dyno. The one where you unbolt your wheels and attach the dyno, meant to be extremely accurate. I duno where the ladies came from, but attached is a photo :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7116-dyno-day-speedworks-81202/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

BTW: I forgot to say:

Big Thanks go to Ivan and crew @ Speedworks for their help with my car and the dyno. And a Big Thanks goes to Brody from All 4 Wheels car club for organsing the day. And if anyone wants the full size pic of those chicks pm me your email address and I'll send it (its about 1.2mb) :D

Originally posted by skyzerr33

that works out to be about 270rwhp

good numbers dude but its gonna ruin any of your why didn't i run a 13sec 1/4 arguements as u have plenty grunt according to that figure.

True. But i still think i can run a 13.*something* i want to start playing with my tyre pressures.

Quite a few of the guys have it here now as well. Its a set of polyurethene bushes that slip into the craddle mounts on the rear, there are 3 settings; drift, traction and normal. Basically it adjusts the way power is transfered to the wheels. The drift setting allows less traction on the rear for better/stable drifting where as the traction allows for better traction when cornering and launching @ drags. Its a kit you can buy from whiteline (kca349 is the part number for r33 skylines) and with a car jack, good socket set and an hour or so you can fit it yourself. Definately worthwhile getting one if you intend on doing a bit of drag racing.

Skyzerr33,

I know what you mean by hard compounds, I have a set of 265's on the back of mine, so I could go drag racing on Wednesday. Well what a waste of time, should have stuck to the 235's, they were much stickier. The 265's are hard as rock, and therefore not much grip even being wider. I still think that changing tyre pressure will be marginal, but if it works for you then cool.

Has anyone changed the camber of the rear wheels in order to get better traction. After I lowered the rear of my car and have about 2deg of negative camber. I am planning on dialling it back to neutral, has anyone done this?

See'ya:burnout:

Dude, that is a pretty huge dyno readout, 270 rwhp without any sort of management, your car must be a freak.

With the pineapples, if it makes things clearer, the drift setup firms up the back end, the drag setup promotes squat, and the track setup is between the two from memory - hope this helps.

Skyzerr33,

Thanks for clearing that up, cheers mate.

Rob77,

I didn't say it didn't work for him, but I was told in general that it was a waste of time. Does anyone else run low pressures? If so what pressure and what tyres are they on?

See'ya :burnout:

GTS-t VSPEC,

to carry on from skyzerr, you can use the fat ones at the front with skinny ones at the rear (promote squat), skinny ones at front with fat ones at rear (drifto madness), or just use the skinny ones for in between (hope I got them the right way). They come with fitting instructions anyway. If you are getting any work done to your car involving putting it on a hoist, just pop in and chuck em on while she is up, they are dead easy to do, just a bit more difficult if you have to stuff around with a car jack:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...