Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gday all,

i am selling both items below which were both bought brand new from P.E.T Modifications a little over 1 year ago. Reason is i am in the market for buying a house and possibly a 2nd car so i need to free up some money and have a short break from the car.

* Garrett GT3040R (700177-0014 : 600hp core with A/R .63 exhaust housing)

fyi, this turbo runs the genuine garrett gt40 compressor wheel as found in the 700hp GT35R, although with the smaller GT30 turbine wheel as in the HKS GT3037S)

* 45mm Turbosmart external wastegate (self explanatory)

these two items have only been run about 5-6000kms given that i constantly travel overseas for work and i got married last year where i was away for 2 months on my honeymoon. Also, my work is only 8kms away from home, so yeah it's a short drive.

the turbo has almost always been run on ~14psi since fitting as i don't have big enough injectors & fuel pump to support high boost.

only once when i leant some larger injectors from dennis at P.E.T Mods (was trying to tune car for dyno shootout at MAS last year - although the car never went on), we pushed it up to 24psi where my car (Ford Sierra Cosworth RS500) made ~280rwkw on PULP. After MAS i had to give the injectors back as he needed them for his own car, which meant the stock ones went back in and boost went back down to 14psi where it's been ever since.

Price (Garrett GT3040R) = $1600

Price (45mm turbosmart wastegate) = $600

or $2100 as a package.

this package would be ideal for anyone that wants to build a big hp street 4 cyl 2L or RB20/25/30, etc.

fyi, these items are still in my car so for anyone that's interested and in melbourne, you can hear them running for yourself.

i'll try and organise some pics soon so if interested, please reply here or PM me.

thanks for looking.

MasTers,

sorry, i've been a little busy and haven't got round to the pics as yet. hopefully monday.

Shane,

yes it's a genuine Garrett Dual ball-bearing GT3040R.

on my engine (2L sierra cosworth), i had 14psi by about 4200rpm.

power wise, i'm not too sure to be honest as we never did a proper power tune/run on 14psi. It would've been making around 180-190rwkw, although it really woke up when we tuned it at 24psi for MAS last year.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...