Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I hope this hasnt been asked before, I did a seach but couldnt find anything on it.

I have a silvia with an RB20, wolf 3d all the other crap. I have a t3/4 on it now but have a TD06-19C to go on to replace the t3/4. I bought the car off a friend witha blown motor which happened from a company tuning it for boost and made it go bang. anyway, back to the main question,

With my TD06-19C and wolf 3d and GTR injectors (which I am thikning of buying), what kind of power would I be looking at? I dont want to buy the GTR injectors and find they are too small and I have to get something later, or if I upgrade the turbo again later I will have to do the injectors too.

I am sure there are lots of you out there with GTR Injectors in your RB20s, so please let me in on your knowledge!

Thanks alot.

Rhys Hutcheson.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73159-gtr-injectors-max-power/
Share on other sites

What is the CC of standard R33 GTS-T injectors?

RB26DETT - Low Impedence Top feed 444cc

RB25DET - High Impedence Side Feed 370cc

RB20DET - High Impedence Top Feed (270cc - ?)

So you are telling me that in a GTR STD injectors can handel 528hp?? That doesnt sound right to me!! If that was right, why would they change the injectors then?

Rhys

No,

You miss-read one important letter ;)

well from what i have seen the std gtr injector will make around 400rwhp,with everything working well (good pump and fuel pressure ),and i know there is the ability to get a bit more out of them with the wolf if you find someone who likes to tune it (good luck)(just stirring) but i never see the logic in push the limits of the injectors when they all cost basically the same new and new sard can be land for about $120ea new.

So if your looking over 400rwhp i wouldnt bother with second injectors, but if you think you will not exceed that (which is a most likely with rb20) the gtr injectors should do fine.

Pretty sure injector flow formula is as follows:

CC of injector divided by 5 x how many cylinders = Max BHP at 100% duty.

So, 440cc divided by 5 = 88 x 6 cylinders = 528BHP.

Yep, but you can't run an engine with injectors at 100%, you need some overhead for acceleration enrichment and changing weather conditions. Around 80% is a good working maximum.

My rule of thumb in a 6 cylinder engine is injector cc's = bhp

444cc's = 444 bhp

divide by 1.34 for kw = 331 kw

subtract 55 rwkw for 2wd losses = 276 rwkw

or subtract 75rwkw for 4wd losses = 256 4wkw

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...