Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello this is my first post so forgive me if there is something repeated.

I am thinking of buying either an R32 or R33 GTS-T and was wondering what the pro's and con's are of both models...power, interior, looks etc. I was told by many that the R32 is lighter and hence a better all round car, is this true. I would also like to know wether an R33 could keep up with an R32. By the way i've used the search and found no relavant info.. Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/
Share on other sites

r33 is slower, bigger, but more practical. refined handling characteristics make it less fun to drive, its newer.

r32 is quicker, smaller, more enjoyable handling characteristics, less of them around. Older, but if you find a good example this shouldnt matter.

You sound like you care more about how the car drives than pulling the chicks at maccas, so get an r32. Test drive as many as you can before you make a decision.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370205
Share on other sites

guess it depends on what you can afford.

I picked a S2 R33 gtst cos it was a newer and larger car. I've found it a joy to drive, although I haven't driven a R32 to compare.

looks are a matter of opinion. i'd definitely pick a series II over a series I R33. A Do-luck or Vertex kitted 32 looks awesome but. Just really depends on what you wanna do aswell.

Interior wise. R33 has more room, being a bigger car. Again, not a big fan of the series I interior (seats), although the dash and that are the same.

Go visit a few on sale and make up your mind then!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370262
Share on other sites

r33 is slower, bigger, but more practical. refined handling characteristics make it less fun to drive, its newer.  

r32 is quicker, smaller, more enjoyable handling characteristics, less of them around. Older, but if you find a good example this shouldnt matter.

You sound like you care more about how the car drives than pulling the chicks at maccas, so get an r32. Test drive as many as you can before you make a decision.

pentae, just becasue you got an r32 doesnt mean its the best:

I have a dvd which shows a race between all the model skylines with the inclusion of a evo and subaru. The R32 GT-R came last. Its a nice car but is just too much of an old car that EVERYONE can buy now. I see R32's as much as R33's now on the street. And i wonder what the year on them is? 1989 or 1990.

The R33 is more practical, faster, cheaper to make more power, an interior that doesnt look like a Holden Commodore VN (R32 interior). All together its a newer car, less things will go bang on it. So it spends more time on the road and less in a garage.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370329
Share on other sites

pentae, just becasue you got an r32 doesnt mean its the best:

I have a dvd which shows a race between all the model skylines with the inclusion of a evo and subaru. The R32 GT-R came last. Its a nice car but is just too much of an old car that EVERYONE can buy now. I see R32's as much as R33's now on the street. And i wonder what the year on them is? 1989 or 1990.  

The R33 is more practical, faster, cheaper to make more power, an interior that doesnt look like a Holden Commodore VN (R32 interior). All together its a newer car, less things will go bang on it. So it spends more time on the road and less in a garage.

LoL...I have a dvd, therefore that race represents all R32s as a whole. What are u on about man? I don't know what one off race ur talkin about, but the 32 was the king of the JTC...and ever heard of bathurst? GTR 32s are officially the quickest out of all series, followed by r34 and last r33.

Also, I still don't think there are anywhere as much 32s, as 33s on the road. BTW R33s are also old cars now.

In the end though, when you are comparing GTST's, i'd go the 33. GTRs are in different league altogether.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370347
Share on other sites

I have a dvd which shows a race between all the model skylines with the inclusion of a evo and subaru.

Think I saw that one. Think I remember a 350GT V35 in there also which beat the 32GTR? 33GTR was bout in middle. R34 won but evo and sub gave it a good workout.

Maybe getting my vidz mixed up. I remember the Jap guy in the 350 saying he would be really upset if the 32 beat him but he ended up ahead i think, by the end. The 33 then 34GTR although heavier have torque, age and technology pushing them ahead.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370585
Share on other sites

"was"

I rest my case

Sure. So "was" the r33. So you're not really making a point are you?

If you don't like R32s fair enough man, I like Skylines in general, including R33s. But you can't rant on about R32s being no good becuase they're old. In that case the only Skylines that are new are R34s....see it doesn't really make sense?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370733
Share on other sites

i think you'll find alot of people on here ar bias, as i own an r33 i will tell you they are better in most cases, and same for 32 owners :(

so it does come down to personal preferences alot, the only way you can decide this with out being told by other people is to do factual research and most importantly test drive, true that the 32 is older then the 33, however in comparison to local dealership cars of the same age they are elite.

power and handling wise can be compremised these days so easily through mods that its more a case to identify which car is a better "base" providing you buy a stocker and have plans to mod, i suggest you go an test drive various 32's and 33's including the 32 gtr, as if you are potentially in the market for a 33 gts-t then a 32 gtr isnt too much firther out of that price bracket

just my 2.416 cents

-Ruffels

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370754
Share on other sites

krzysiu: Just because I happen to own an r32 doesnt mean I cant vouch for the r33's good points. Infact I mentioned quite a few of them to have a stab at an unbiased post. My best mate had an 800hp r33 GTR in 2000 before most people knew that the r33 existed, and i was re-introduced to skylines with this car. I even said their handling is more refined..

The fact is I own an r32 because I have thoroughly driven r31s, 32 gts-ts, gtrs, 33 gts-t's, a 800hp 33 GTR, a 34 GTT and a 34 GTR. I've owned a Pulsar Gtir and an sr20det s13 that both destroyed gts-t's.

Jumping into a GTS-t to me feels like getting into a big, slow s13 / s14 / s15 with more interior room. Which it is. I dont really understand why someone would want to buy a GTS-T as a sports/performance car when you can get a 200sx/silvia equivelant that will blow its doors off mod for mod, and be more of a blast to drive. I guess it depends on how much money you want to spend to make your bigger car go faster than the smaller car. But thats just me, thats how I think. :(

So i've got an r32 GTR in my garage? Yeah I have a 16 year old car that cost me over 20 grand because the r32 is the most raw car out of the series.

Its funny how you compare the VN commodore interior to the r32, I actually compare the exterior looks of the 33 to that of a commodore. Particularly white ones. Maybe thats why guys stick the GTR body parts on them.. :D

That reminds me, Hows your GTR wing going mate?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1370941
Share on other sites

R32

They look better. :P

i've owned both, but the R33 i used to have was stock, and my current R32 is no where near stock. so i cant really compare them because of that. but this car handles fkn awesome and feels a lot lighter than the R33 and i like that.

But R32's are older, and you have to be careful when buying one to make sure there arent any major problems and the previous owner really took care of the car.

r32 that's lowered + gtr kit = ultra sexeh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1371263
Share on other sites

In pretty much every poll ive ever seen 32's are always rated the best, then 34's and 33's are always dead last. You will find some 33 drivers that converted to a 32 but very rarely can the opposite be said. I don't know who said the 32GTR was the slowest but thats bs, they are the quickest of all for a reason. Personally if i had the cash to buy a 33 i would buy a 32 and use the money for mods, eg rb25 engine swap. At the end of the day though if you like the 33's go for it, YOU will be the one driving it everyday so pick a car that puts a smile on your face evey time you look at it :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1373377
Share on other sites

ok look i own botha R32 GTS-T(1992) and a R33 GTS-T(1994)S1

and i have driven both for awhile now for over a year

generally i prefer the r33 roomier more modern and plus its quicker then the 32

the 32 feels like it lacks the torque from the 33's RB25DET

but the 32 does feel like it handles better then the 33 more of a nimbler car

mod for mod if your looking to mod your car the R33 will produce more power the the R32.

Correct me im im wrong but doenst the gts-t r33 do a 14.4 quarter mile

while a r32 gst-t does somtihing in the vacinity for 15.5 quater mile

but i drive both cars around im i feel that the R33 is a much quicker car.

It mainly comes down to preference and your budget.

R32 is generally a bit cheaper then the R33. So buy watever u want

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74649-r32-or-r33/#findComment-1373379
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...