Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As long as there all around the same number it should be fine.

Thx for the reply.

Yeh that's what my mechanic said. The ODO says ~61000, with a Tomei speedo, but even the dealer agreed that's probably unlikely the real KMs (I've been very happy with the honesty of these guys, it's really worked for me and brought me on board).

Mechanic they are all the same, 138, that that indicated probably up to 100 thou kms, but nice treatment and no abuse. The car's condition is excellent.

And MAN is it FAAASSSSTTT! :crazy: :crazy:

yeh when i bought my gtr i got the dude to get it comp tested b4 i bought?145 across all six?why would they be different?less kms maybe

Yeh quite simply engine wear will reduce compression. If there is variance between cylinders, that shows abuse or ill-health, so I am told from decent sources. Compression will just reduce over time - over KMs.

I am aware motors that have been sitting for some time will show lower compression when first started - I saw this with an SR20DET of mine. It increased by 10 after a week or two.

However, I've flogged this thing enough myself - so I don't see that being the case. I will however, as my mechanic suggested (best mate) check it in a few weeks of driving. He old man, who runs the shop, reckoned it won't change since I've already flogged it. We'll see who's right ;)

They're always arguing... lol :chairshot

Mechanic they are all the same, 138, that that indicated probably up to 100 thou kms, but nice treatment and no abuse.

I'm starting to miss a lot of words when I'm typing posts. I think that drinking on the weekend might've actually damaged my frontal lobe or something...

:bonk:

Hi Andrew, That compression is a bit low and your right in the fact well at leasts its the same over all 6, but the reading does tend to indicate that the motor is now old (obviously) but is probably whats the word 'rattlier' / not so tight anymore. A fresh gtr engine comes in at around 180. Mine is an aussie delivered one and when i bought it had 108k on the clock and comp tested in the 160 accross all six.

My suggestion try to find a tighter one, sure it may go hard.... for now.

Hi Andrew, That compression is a bit low and your right in the fact well at leasts its the same over all 6, but the reading does tend to indicate that the motor is now old (obviously) but is probably whats the word 'rattlier' / not so tight anymore. A fresh gtr engine comes in at around 180. Mine is an aussie delivered one and when i bought it had 108k on the clock and comp tested in the 160 accross all six.  

My suggestion try to find a tighter one, sure it may go hard.... for now.

But I love everything else about the car! It's my only concern... :goddam:

I could just take it, and expect to replace rings, bearings and gaskets in a year or so. I'm guessing 3-4k for that. Whaddya think?

6-10k unless you can do all the labour yourself.....

Well my best mate is a mechanic. I would get cheap labour, but not REAL cheap (they still have a business to run, and he has a partner, and he don't work outta hours, much like me).

Not speaking off full rebuild, just the rings and necessary bits like bearings gaskets and stuff...

Less than 6k you think Duncan?

I hope so !!!

Pistons and rings 1300

head reco 500

bottom end clean, hone 300

crank and rods test and check, balance all 300

gasket kit 500

water pump 200

n1 oil pump 500

rod bolts 100

head bolts 50

thats 4k to get started.

then labour for engine in and out say 10 hours

+ actual build time

If you really like the car and you feel you are getting a good price and have factored in the engine condition go for it.

How long have you been looking for a GTR? Can I ask how much this one is (don't reply if question not appropriate) There are lots of really good ones out there its just a matter of finding one. It took me about 3-4 months.

If you really like the car and you feel you are getting a good price and have factored in the engine condition go for it.

How long have you been looking for a GTR? Can I ask how much this one is (don't reply if question not appropriate) There are lots of really good ones out there its just a matter of finding one. It took me about 3-4 months.

The car was up for $27990. I'm trading two silvias, fairly hammered in terms of paint & interior, one Q, one K with mods (GT-SS, Apex Hybrid, 2450lb clutch, 3" mild steel, z32 brakes, etc). So the two silvys + 16,100. I could do better with a private sale on the silvys, but it so much hassle and with their nick and people test driving and stuff - I really can't be arsed.

I've been looking just a few weeks; I'm probably impatient to my own detriment, but I don't see myself finding much any better, without flying to Japan. (?)

Thing is I'm looking for something virginal. I don't want a modded, hammered car - it's condition is fantastic. Color is great. Brembos (big deal for me), great interior. Spotless engine back (the slave cyl has leaked at some point and stripped a little paint but it's well rusted on that little patch (surface) and hasn't seeped even with me really CLAMPING on the anchors, so I believe that's history.

Here's my spiel on the car I posted, with some (nokia) pics....

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=77434

Seriously, tell me like it is. I want feedback :)

You say the plenum hasn't lost much paint so thats always a good sign.

My honest opinion - the comp ratio would worry me. I realise you are able to trade in your current cars and the appeal of Brembo brakes is always tempting (however this can always be done later, some people say they are over rated, never experienced brembos - another thread.lol)

I would be surprised though if a perfectly standard car returned that comp ratio, gut feeling thinks it may not have been so standard with its previous owner.

Personal choice I would skip it.

End of the day anything is fixable if you really like the rest of the car which sounds pretty good.

Pistons and rings 1300

head reco 500

bottom end clean, hone 300

crank and rods test and check, balance all 300

gasket kit 500

water pump 200

n1 oil pump 500

rod bolts 100

head bolts 50

thats 4k to get started.

then labour for engine in and out say 10 hours  

+ actual build time

Scuse ignorance, but couldn't you change rings, bearings and gaskets without doing a lot of this stuff? I mean pumps, head reco, bottom end clean, balancing? I understand once the engine is down you might as well do it all, and I would, but just a Q from curiousity...

Still, when compression is gone I guess valves n stuff (head reco) has to be done - cos that could be the issue. Then, that could no doubt be tested.

I guess the answer is no, that'd be silly :)

i actually looked at the comp test i had again and said all 150 so i gather thats ok for a 15year old car

Yes, that's really quite good I would say! No rebuild at any point? What KMs?

I wish mine was 150. I've done a lot of posting to old sites (S13 related, etc) to knowledgeable people who've done lots tuning etc. The consensus is the motor will be fine, but if I boost the shit out of it I'm in trouble. Boosting isn't my primary goal, I've owned turbo jap cars long enough to understand it's all about flow - not rising boost. Sure, if I wanna race or whatever, I'll up it. But as I learnt with the Silvia, you can change turbos and intake/exhaust etc and get more power at less boost, thereby giving your engine a longer life. This is my intention with the GT-R. If and/or when I want to go high boost, I'll be prepared to tear the motor down.

There is no variance in the cylinders, so it's just age. There is also the vague possibilty that my mechanic's gauge is not spot on.

He also did not release fuel pressure, as the manual states. I would imagine though that if anything that would give a higher reading (fuel pressure added to the cyl compression). He didn't seem to think it mattered (the fuel pressure being there).

well you mentioned the manual so youve probabaly allready read this but anyway

Standard is 171psi at 300rpm

Limit value is 128psi at 300rpm

maximum variance limit between cylinders is 14psi

so 138 is still above that, but not a huge amount

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...